- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 13,550
- Reaction score
- 152,874
Exactly. You can't prevent Jodi from selling drawings that have nothing to do with the crime.
Well that just stinks. She sure has a lot of rights. Hope she gets sentenced to time alone 24/7!
Exactly. You can't prevent Jodi from selling drawings that have nothing to do with the crime.
Evidence will be presented on the circumstances of the offense and on cruelty because the jury will need to weigh that evidence against the mitigation evidence. The jurors will be told of the prior findings, of course, but the evidence will likely be presented to them through witnesses and exhibits. The only other option would be to show them high-quality video of agreed-upon selections of the prior testimony, but that would only happen IMO if both sides agree and if anyone even thinks of the option (the court video would be too crappy; they would have to use the media video).
I don't think the absence of cameras will speed things up much, except of course there won't be repeated motions and hearings asking to kick out the cameras.
I don't think she will get the DP because (1) the new jury will not be as immersed in the evidence about the crime itself as the old jury was, (2) Jodi only needs one juror who pities her because she was (allegedly) abused by Travis...or because she's small and female...or because she was "used" by Travis as many people have said...or because she seems mentally "off"...or so many other things. Just one juror.
Neesaki, we all feel this way but don't you want to see the trial? I do.
Dog gone it, my post came up twice again. I am sorry. I don't know why. Sometimes I can't post because I get a message that my post is too short, even when it is several lines long. Maybe it is my iPad. Sorry folks.
YesorNo, thank you for your post. You answered some questions my hubby and I were wondering about this morning. "Depression is the absence of hope and it's not just being sad- it's that numb feeling- like being dead already."
I'm very happy for you to have your children!
Neesaki, we all feel this way but don't you want to see the trial? I do.
Interesting that this has happened to several people lately. I am always on my ipad and the few times I double-posted I got a pop-up stating it was already posted (don't remember exact words). Never had the "too short" message, tho.
I would like to thank Y/N, too. That was an excellent post. I also went through a very bad time when my children were rather young and I came upon a saying that really stuck with me whenever times were rough: "Children are the heart strings that hold a mother to life." It was so true then, and still keeps me going through rough times.
I want very much to see the trial, but I believe "she" would put on an even stronger presence if it was live streamed. I will gladly wait for the "replay" --- just hope it shows the whole thing, not just snippets.
I think the only way the judge would allow a 15-min. delay broadcast would be if there was some one-issue hearing that was separable from the rest of the penalty phase.
I believe it was the defense consistently requesting no cameras. I believe (perhaps cynically) that the reason for the request was to create an appeal issue re: "circus" atmosphere allegedly affecting jurors, prosecution, witnesses, etc.
I don't think it will be aired live or with a 15-min. delay. And I don't think she will get the death penalty. But I will not be sorry if wshe does.
I'm trying to reply.. Tried to post a couple of times, then after i have vented, it says the message is too short. yep, one of those sad days.
FAA just restricted all air travel over Ferguson, Missouri, due to the rioting and looters and threats from the outside because of the death of that teenager by LE. What a day.
I don't think she will get death penalty either~~the only satisfaction I get is she'll have to figure out her own appeal as it won't be automatic :thinking:
How can they show delayed trial clips, either during or after the trial, if there are no cameras in the courtroom to film them?
How can they show delayed trial clips, either during or after the trial, if there are no cameras in the courtroom to film them?
She still thinks of herself in that way, thinks the DP is unlikely, if not impossible - she now has her family collecting $ for appeals, and playing up her innocent act to her followers because she thinks the current conviction was wrong. She's arrogant enough to blame that on her defense team and wants to represent herself now, probably with hopes of introducing something she can use on future appeals. She thinks somehow, some way, she's going to be free - but not if she can't appeal. And she can't appeal if she accepts a plea. Nope, she's going to court, and will probably enjoy playing victim/lawyer, believing the jury will not only like her, but sympathize with her 'plight'. Right up to the minute they turn the lock on her prison cell door, and hopefully one that is on death row so her ability to communicate with anyone is severely restricted.In going back to the question presented Ms. Arias does not see the possibility of a death verdict being very likely. This feeling is in large part based on the fact that Ms. Arias has no prior criminal history and even if the jury were to find her guilty of first degree murder the fact that said murder would be a product of a chaotic relationship would seem to diminish the chances that a death penalty would be imposed. Ms. Arias' thinking the most severe sanction that is likely to be imposed upon her should she lose at trial is a life sentence. Thus, should the State make and offer that would impose a life sentence upon her, such an offer provides Ms. Arias with no incentive to accept such a resolution. Instead, Ms. Arias is of the mindset that she has no incentive to plead guilty to anything more than second degree murder. Ms. Arias takes this position knowing that she could in fact receive a more favorable verdict at trial while at the same time cognizant of the pain Mr. Alexander's family feels....
Kaddy, there will be a camera in the courtroom, but we won't get to watch it live. It will be recorded and can be shown after the jury reaches its sentencing verdict.
The judge has ruled that some of the trial can be shown with a delay of at least 15 minutes with her permission. At the time of her ruling (was it last June?), the speculation in the media was she might allow the showing of opening and closing arguments. But of course this is strictly speculation.
Another poster expressed surprise that some media outlets, particularly HLN, weren't fighting this order tooth and nail and I'm surprised, too. The only thing I can think of is that the media has fought this type of order in other courts and lost.
Robin Williams passed away today at age 63. We'll miss you, Robin. RIP
Apparently suicide.
Dog gone it, my post came up twice again. I am sorry. I don't know why. Sometimes I can't post because I get a message that my post is too short, even when it is several lines long. Maybe it is my iPad. Sorry folks.
I am curious...Anyone here this morning think that if they go through the penalty phase again, that JA will just get LWOP? Does anyone think the jury will feel sorry for her? Does anyone here think she will really get death? Does anyone think it will go faster without cameras in the courtroom? Is anyone as upset as I am that we won't have transparency this time and can't see the trial for ourselves when we are vested in the outcome?
You are not alone as I too want cameras and hope the judge ends up giving at least a short delay for cameras instead of not at all.
But even if no cameras, I think there will be news reporters summing up each day of the case and so maybe we can still discuss based on daily writeups by news people or others who may be attending the trial.
I dont want to give Jodi a platform for her narcism but my desire to see this outweighs that by a long shot. I want to see her fall on her face and be laughed out of the courtroom each day.
I'm trying to reply.. Tried to post a couple of times, then after i have vented, it says the message is too short. yep, one of those sad days.
FAA just restricted all air travel over Ferguson, Missouri, due to the rioting and looters and threats from the outside because of the death of that teenager by LE. What a day.
I'm sorry you're having these annoying bounce backs. Last week I accepted an offer from Oracle to update my Java app. Since then I can barely navigate. I've done a system restore and I uninstalled my mail server and reinstalled it. Helped not at all. Java is connected to many illegitimate resources and I had not realised that, thinking Oracle was reputable. You have my total sympathy.
I'm puzzled about why anyone thinks she would accept a deal for LWOP, even if it were offered? The best outcome she could get is life with possibility of parole after 25 years and to hope AZ brings back parole - the 2012 statute that eliminated it doesn't apply to her, as I understand it. I would be surprised to see that sentence, especially since Judge Stevens knows the statute now reads only DP and natural life, but it is still on the table and JA is delusional. Remember, this is the woman who thought as late as 2011 that the jury could find for manslaughter, bargained for 2nd degree several times, and sees Travis' murder as a result only of his abuse - she's a victim, remember? This is from Nurmi's 2011 motion re: a deal and her thinking of DP possibility:
She still thinks of herself in that way, thinks the DP is unlikely, if not impossible - she now has her family collecting $ for appeals, and playing up her innocent act to her followers because she thinks the current conviction was wrong. She's arrogant enough to blame that on her defense team and wants to represent herself now, probably with hopes of introducing something she can use on future appeals. She thinks somehow, some way, she's going to be free - but not if she can't appeal. And she can't appeal if she accepts a plea. Nope, she's going to court, and will probably enjoy playing victim/lawyer, believing the jury will not only like her, but sympathize with her 'plight'. Right up to the minute they turn the lock on her prison cell door, and hopefully one that is on death row so her ability to communicate with anyone is severely restricted.
I'm sorry you're having these annoying bounce backs. Last week I accepted an offer from Oracle to update my Java app. Since then I can barely navigate. I've done a system restore and I uninstalled my mail server and reinstalled it. Helped not at all. Java is connected to many illegitimate resources and I had not realised that, thinking Oracle was reputable. You have my total sympathy.