- Joined
- Apr 6, 2013
- Messages
- 34,377
- Reaction score
- 69,040
This is funny, YorN, but I can't really blame the guy. It's one of those things that is a wild card factor on any jury, from what I've seen of this case. He did find her guilty of Murder 1, so he wasn't completely crazy. Maybe, in the end, he simply could not vote to sentence a young woman to death. And here again, we're up against the fact that she is a female.
I'm going to go off on a tangent; please bear with me. Jodi Arias was one of those young women who needed to find a husband, who seemed to have no sense of worth of herself as a person who should have her own education, interests, and self support. She was some kind of a throwback, IMO. This guy, too, seems to be a throwback. Women should have equal rights, and with this, they should have equal responsibilities--not to murder, for one thing. I simply cannot get past the fact that the defense had some kind of double standard at work. It was so sleazy, so pathetic.
I do think the foreman is "old-fashion" in his ideas of what women's and men's roles should be (and how men should/shouldn't talk to women).
Jodi Arias and the Dilemma of Beautiful Killers: Whats the optimal amount of lipgloss to avoid the electric chair?
"...she could avoid the electric chair if she got just one juror to take her side. Since verdicts need to be unanimous, a single holdout could hang the whole case and save her from hanging. For that reason, Ariass better strategy might have been to come to court in full vixen mode, and hope to make one of the jurors fall in love with her...."
http://allisonleotta.com/2013/04/jo...ount-of-lipgloss-to-avoid-the-electric-chair/
:sheesh: