SIDEBAR #30- Arias/Alexander forum

[ILikeToBendPages]

It's a beautiful autumn evening of the 293 day of the year, I hope the next 72 days will be as nice.




1767 - Maryland and Pennsylvania agree on the boundaries of the Mason - Dixion line.


[video=youtube;pvPSHKuu22U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=pvPSHKuu22U[/video]




1867 - The United States took possession of Alaska from Russia. And now Russia has said they want it back and will take it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=qUTDYFNjNkI


1935 - Tommy Dorsey records. "I’m Getting Sentimental Over You".It becomes of the all time big band themes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=cKQc-cbAvdQ


1943 - The first broadcast of "Perry Mason" was presented on CBS Radio. The show went to TV in 1957.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=QwL333cfCjU


1954 - Texas Instruments announces the Regency TR-1 Transistor radio.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=5KnxSE09EnQ


1961 - Natalie Wood, stars in the film adaptation of "West Side Story "

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Vij9bXUoE3A


1962 - Tommy Sheridan and the Beat brothers ask "Let Dance".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=N82PmhqEKOE


1969 - Rod Stewart joined Small Faces

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=JGEgRnvFzLY


1990 - Robert Matthew Van Winkle , better known as Vanilla Ice tops the charts with "Ice Ice Baby"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=149jGeIlx3I


2014 - Hannah Grahams body found.

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

Hi all,

Would you say that Jodi is not only a psychopath murderer, but a witch-type, succubus?

Definition of a succubus:

A succubus is a female demon or supernatural entity in folklore (traced back to medieval legend) that appears in dreams and takes the form of a woman in order to seduce men, usually through sexual activity.

Jodi has a quasi religion of beliefs. She believes in the book, The Secret, and some witchcraft thrown in. She is true to none of them.

Many of us have wondered if she was from the devil.

 

[Z&BsMommy]

TrialWatcher...Arias has done the cut throat motion many times. Here are two more instances:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psHxJ01pqoI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLxNbzveMyY

ETA: She should never be free, I agree. She loved killing Travis and she will do it all over again to the Hughes, Mimi, Deanna, Juan Martinez, Demarte, Judge Stephens...her list gets longer every week.

Sorry for chiming in so late, but this gave me chills.. It is almost as if she is reliving it. What a monster. Poor Travis..

#ComeHomeChristina

 

[daisydomino]

Jodi has a quasi religion of beliefs. She believes in the book, The Secret, and some witchcraft thrown in. She is true to none of them.

Many of us have wondered if she was from the devil.

I think she doesn't believe in anything except her idea that she's smarter than each one of us and all of us. She pretends to believe in things that she has noticed make other people willingly suspend disbelief. That's what she's counting on. She's just a liar.

 

[rose222]

Jodi has a quasi religion of beliefs. She believes in the book, The Secret, and some witchcraft thrown in. She is true to none of them.

Many of us have wondered if she was from the devil.

And she mentioned in one of her motions about some precious book of hers in which she had, in the margins, written about the similarities between Buddhism and Christianity. She's now interested in comparative religion. :scared: Perhaps she'll thrown in some quotes about the Buddhist teachings of non-violence in her allocution this time around. Such disrespect towards something so sacred. Life/breath, religion, friendship etc. all exist only for her to manipulate, use and throw away. That's Jodi Arias for you.

 

[daisydomino]

Good morning! Happy Sunday!

If you are up to it, have a look a this Michael Kiefer article for The Republic this morning:
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...s-arizona-death-penalty-prosecutors/17543593/
Why Jodi Arias faces death, and others have not
Jodi Arias faces the death penalty in her retrial; other heinous murders are pleaded down

 

[Hez]

Good morning! Happy Sunday!

If you are up to it, have a look a this Michael Kiefer article for The Republic this morning:
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...s-arizona-death-penalty-prosecutors/17543593/
Why Jodi Arias faces death, and others have not
Jodi Arias faces the death penalty in her retrial; other heinous murders are pleaded down

Yet again Kiefer's bias shows. He wrote "There was no plea offer for Arias; she went to trial and was convicted of first degree murder." That's not entirely true. He neglected to mention that the convict offered to plead guilty to second degree murder in exchange for not using her sick made-up allegations about Travis at trial. She essentially tried to blackmail his family into letting her off with a 10-15 year sentence to prevent her from tarnishing their brother's reputation with lies. I'm glad they called her bluff and exposed the convict's lies. Of course Kiefer conveniently left this out of his article. :facepalm:

 

[krkrjx]

Good morning! Happy Sunday!

If you are up to it, have a look a this Michael Kiefer article for The Republic this morning:
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...s-arizona-death-penalty-prosecutors/17543593/
Why Jodi Arias faces death, and others have not
Jodi Arias faces the death penalty in her retrial; other heinous murders are pleaded down

Arias would not have faced the death penalty if she had pleaded guilty to first degree murder. In this case the evidence screamed premeditation. There was no reason to offer this killer a deal of a lesser charge for a guilty plea--that might be done when the evidence is not clear to either guilt as charged or premeditation.

Arias could have pleaded guilty as charged and be sentenced to life in prison. She would not do that. She insisted on second degree and the prosecutor declined. Prosecutor represents the people and in this case it seems quite evident that the majority want death for this killer. How many potential jurors sat in the courtroom recently and said that out loud? Quite a few, considering even outspoken people often try to refrain in a situation like that.

Keifer is entitled to his opinion, closed-minded as it is.

ETA: Just want to add that IMO the prosecutor would have been willing to deal with Arias to plead guilty to first degree murder in exchange for death penalty taken off the table. I have never seen such an offer but I do believe it might have been offered. IMO of course.

 

[Nore]

:floorlaugh:

BBM You don't mean that. You'll be running out there if you hear a mouse sneeze, IMO.

----------

Hi Bernina, we are all waiting for our baby. I hope it comes soon. I'm sure you and mommy are both tired of waiting..cant wait to see the baby.

 

[Spycraft]

Good morning! Happy Sunday!

If you are up to it, have a look a this Michael Kiefer article for The Republic this morning:
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...s-arizona-death-penalty-prosecutors/17543593/
Why Jodi Arias faces death, and others have not
Jodi Arias faces the death penalty in her retrial; other heinous murders are pleaded down

When I read, through articles, forums etc., that a writer doesn't necessarily dislike Nurmi because he is, after all, just "doing his job" and repeatedly asked to be taken off as counsel, I cringe. Believing myself to be open minded and tolerant, I am often shocked by the intensity of my disdain and disgust of Nurmi. Yes, he has an awful client. Yes, he reportedly asked numerous times to be taken off the case, although I am suspect of his motive. Yes, he has a job to do.

But he didn't just help Arias slander and vilify Travis with vicious and vile lies, he perpetuated and exaggerated those lies with the constant repetition of each hateful accusation in questioning every witness, using each defense witness to agree to and support these hateful allegations. Every sentence, it seemed, from his mouth included a sexual reference to Travis, each one more vile and disgusting, ensuring jury members never went a day without hearing the defense perversion of Travis' character.

Just in case the public had forgotten that Arias was the real victim, that Travis was a deviant and controlling abuser, that the prosecutor was unethical and a liar, that state witnesses such as Dr. Horn were liars, this defense team of shady and unethical attorneys, client and mitigation specialist are using the media which they so loudly and publicly cry foul of to spin a web of lies accusing everyone of malfeasance: the prosecutor lied, the prosecutor withheld evidence, the prosecutor bullied and harassed witnesses, the detective's wife was involved in spreading a malicious hate campaign as well as using privileged information, the detective shared privileged information with his wife, the state as a whole had created a "circus" atmosphere making a fair trial impossible. (Remember, Nurmi didn't ask that his ridiculous 59 page motion/manifesto be sealed, allowing the media to immediately publish it with every lie and accusation printed in black and white, but he requested and was granted the motion to have the state reply only in sealed proceedings.)

Inevitably, given the defense tactics, the purported disgusting letters were once again a popular topic, getting the message out to the public that at the very least there was some proof of Travis' pedophilia and abuse of Arias, proof that once again the state was fighting against. Nurmi pulled out all the stops with his accusations, assuring the lurid details of the Arias lie were once again front and center. Then, coincidentally (ha ha) this article by Keifer, stirring up the death penalty debate and how seemingly unfair it is for the mean old state to insist on, despite the many examples he gave of other murderers getting off with much lighter sentences......not to mention the slanting of these facts to paint Martinez as the prosecutor who decided singlehandedly to doom poor Arias with a death penalty and with no offers of a lighter sentence.

So I suppose Nurmi is doing his job, if one has a loose interpretation of what that job is and how it can be done. IMO. In the last few weeks he has publicly unleashed his latest tantrum/hate campaign toward the state, made spurious allegations, and once again smeared and spat on the reputation of Travis Alexander.

 

[Niner]

to a nice Sunday afternoon here! Watching the Rams beat Seattle!!! YEA!!!!

What a weird article.


Martinez then called Nurmi "snarky", and the attorneys quibbled a bit.


Did they each call the other "snarky"? I thought Nurmi called Martinez "snarky."

Also, is the last third of that article about Sandra Webber?

yep!

is right!!

:floorlaugh:

BBM You don't mean that. You'll be running out there if you hear a mouse sneeze, IMO.

a mouse sneeze...

It's a beautiful autumn evening of the 293 day of the year, I hope the next 72 days will be as nice.

1943 - The first broadcast of "Perry Mason" was presented on CBS Radio. The show went to TV in 1957.

1962 - Tommy Sheridan and the Beat brothers ask "Let Dance".

2014 - Hannah Grahams body found.

Perry Mason :judge: :loveyou: loved Perry! They had reruns on METV, but not anymore... :tantrum:

My Huz put "Let's Dance" on my Oldies CD for my car! Love it!!

Was it Hannah's body... haven't had time to read over on her thread... They did say it was "near" where Morgan Harrington's body was found!

Yet again Kiefer's bias shows. He wrote "There was no plea offer for Arias; she went to trial and was convicted of first degree murder." That's not entirely true. He neglected to mention that the convict offered to plead guilty to second degree murder in exchange for not using her sick made-up allegations about Travis at trial. She essentially tried to blackmail his family into letting her off with a 10-15 year sentence to prevent her from tarnishing their brother's reputation with lies. I'm glad they called her bluff and exposed the convict's lies. Of course Kiefer conveniently left this out of his article. :facepalm:

Hez you should copy and paste this to the articles in comments, if they have any... haven't looked! Great post!! :wave:

Arias would not have faced the death penalty if she had pleaded guilty to first degree murder. In this case the evidence screamed premeditation. There was no reason to offer this killer a deal of a lesser charge for a guilty plea--that might be done when the evidence is not clear to either guilt as charged or premeditation.

Arias could have pleaded guilty as charged and be sentenced to life in prison. She would not do that. She insisted on second degree and the prosecutor declined. Prosecutor represents the people and in this case it seems quite evident that the majority want death for this killer. How many potential jurors sat in the courtroom recently and said that out loud? Quite a few, considering even outspoken people often try to refrain in a situation like that.

Keifer is entitled to his opinion, closed-minded as it is.

ETA: Just want to add that IMO the prosecutor would have been willing to deal with Arias to plead guilty to first degree murder in exchange for death penalty taken off the table. I have never seen such an offer but I do believe it might have been offered. IMO of course.

yes, VERY closed-minded!

Hope you all have a GREAT Sunday afternoon! Maybe

I plan on watching football ALL DAY LONG!!

GO NINERS!! :Banane05:


:seeya:

 

[Niner]

When I read, through articles, forums etc., that a writer doesn't necessarily dislike Nurmi because he is, after all, just "doing his job" and repeatedly asked to be taken off as counsel, I cringe. Believing myself to be open minded and tolerant, I am often shocked by the intensity of my disdain and disgust of Nurmi. Yes, he has an awful client. Yes, he reportedly asked numerous times to be taken off the case, although I am suspect of his motive. Yes, he has a job to do.

But he didn't just help Arias slander and vilify Travis with vicious and vile lies, he perpetuated and exaggerated those lies with the constant repetition of each hateful accusation in questioning every witness, using each defense witness to agree to and support these hateful allegations. Every sentence, it seemed, from his mouth included a sexual reference to Travis, each one more vile and disgusting, ensuring jury members never went a day without hearing the defense perversion of Travis' character.

Just in case the public had forgotten that Arias was the real victim, that Travis was a deviant and controlling abuser, that the prosecutor was unethical and a liar, that state witnesses such as Dr. Horn were liars, this defense team of shady and unethical attorneys, client and mitigation specialist are using the media which they so loudly and publicly cry foul of to spin a web of lies accusing everyone of malfeasance: the prosecutor lied, the prosecutor withheld evidence, the prosecutor bullied and harassed witnesses, the detective's wife was involved in spreading a malicious hate campaign as well as using privileged information, the detective shared privileged information with his wife, the state as a whole had created a "circus" atmosphere making a fair trial impossible. (Remember, Nurmi didn't ask that his ridiculous 59 page motion/manifesto be sealed, allowing the media to immediately publish it with every lie and accusation printed in black and white, but he requested and was granted the motion to have the state reply only in sealed proceedings.)

Inevitably, given the defense tactics, the purported disgusting letters were once again a popular topic, getting the message out to the public that at the very least there was some proof of Travis' pedophilia and abuse of Arias, proof that once again the state was fighting against. Nurmi pulled out all the stops with his accusations, assuring the lurid details of the Arias lie were once again front and center. Then, coincidentally (ha ha) this article by Keifer, stirring up the death penalty debate and how seemingly unfair it is for the mean old state to insist on, despite the many examples he gave of other murderers getting off with much lighter sentences......not to mention the slanting of these facts to paint Martinez as the prosecutor who decided singlehandedly to doom poor Arias with a death penalty and with no offers of a lighter sentence.

So I suppose Nurmi is doing his job, if one has a loose interpretation of what that job is and how it can be done. IMO. In the last few weeks he has publicly unleashed his latest tantrum/hate campaign toward the state, made spurious allegations, and once again smeared and spat on the reputation of Travis Alexander.

:goodpost: :tyou:

 

[daisydomino]

When I read, through articles, forums etc., that a writer doesn't necessarily dislike Nurmi because he is, after all, just "doing his job" and repeatedly asked to be taken off as counsel, I cringe. Believing myself to be open minded and tolerant, I am often shocked by the intensity of my disdain and disgust of Nurmi. Yes, he has an awful client. Yes, he reportedly asked numerous times to be taken off the case, although I am suspect of his motive. Yes, he has a job to do.

But he didn't just help Arias slander and vilify Travis with vicious and vile lies, he perpetuated and exaggerated those lies with the constant repetition of each hateful accusation in questioning every witness, using each defense witness to agree to and support these hateful allegations. Every sentence, it seemed, from his mouth included a sexual reference to Travis, each one more vile and disgusting, ensuring jury members never went a day without hearing the defense perversion of Travis' character.

Just in case the public had forgotten that Arias was the real victim, that Travis was a deviant and controlling abuser, that the prosecutor was unethical and a liar, that state witnesses such as Dr. Horn were liars, this defense team of shady and unethical attorneys, client and mitigation specialist are using the media which they so loudly and publicly cry foul of to spin a web of lies accusing everyone of malfeasance: the prosecutor lied, the prosecutor withheld evidence, the prosecutor bullied and harassed witnesses, the detective's wife was involved in spreading a malicious hate campaign as well as using privileged information, the detective shared privileged information with his wife, the state as a whole had created a "circus" atmosphere making a fair trial impossible. (Remember, Nurmi didn't ask that his ridiculous 59 page motion/manifesto be sealed, allowing the media to immediately publish it with every lie and accusation printed in black and white, but he requested and was granted the motion to have the state reply only in sealed proceedings.)

Inevitably, given the defense tactics, the purported disgusting letters were once again a popular topic, getting the message out to the public that at the very least there was some proof of Travis' pedophilia and abuse of Arias, proof that once again the state was fighting against. Nurmi pulled out all the stops with his accusations, assuring the lurid details of the Arias lie were once again front and center. Then, coincidentally (ha ha) this article by Keifer, stirring up the death penalty debate and how seemingly unfair it is for the mean old state to insist on, despite the many examples he gave of other murderers getting off with much lighter sentences......not to mention the slanting of these facts to paint Martinez as the prosecutor who decided singlehandedly to doom poor Arias with a death penalty and with no offers of a lighter sentence.

So I suppose Nurmi is doing his job, if one has a loose interpretation of what that job is and how it can be done. IMO. In the last few weeks he has publicly unleashed his latest tantrum/hate campaign toward the state, made spurious allegations, and once again smeared and spat on the reputation of Travis Alexander.

:goodpost:

And it's been like that since day one.
Here's the 2011 memorandum Nurmi wrote up for Arias about that 2nd degree plea:
http://grahamwinch.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/jodiariasngfile.pdf

 

[krkrjx]

Spycraft brings up a very interesting point. Kiefer does not dislike Nurmi for anything he has done in this case because "he is just doing his job." Yet he finds fault with the prosecutor every inch of the way when, really, the prosecutor is also just doing his job. I see nothing wrong with a prosecutor refusing to allow forged documents as evidence; good grief if the tables were turned the defense would holler about it.

How can anyone follow the preaching of one who believes that the defense should not be thwarted in submitting evidence even if it is forged? And that the prosecutor is somehow a persecutor if he objects to such forgeries being submitted as proof of anything?

Personally, I am glad Nurmi was an equine's behind before and during the trial. He really did not leave stones unturned--tried anything and everything including perpetuation of slander and other lies. But, his elaborating on any possibility no matter how miniscule means Arias will not have a successful appeal based on inadequate representation. Take that pipe and smoke it, Mr. Kiefer!

 

[rose222]

A good 2013 article on Keifer "Michael Kiefer: AGAINST THE FIRST AMENDMENT / AGAINST HIMSELF."

http://lindapariscrimeblog.com/?p=604

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

When I read, through articles, forums etc., that a writer doesn't necessarily dislike Nurmi because he is, after all, just "doing his job" and repeatedly asked to be taken off as counsel, I cringe. Believing myself to be open minded and tolerant, I am often shocked by the intensity of my disdain and disgust of Nurmi. Yes, he has an awful client. Yes, he reportedly asked numerous times to be taken off the case, although I am suspect of his motive. Yes, he has a job to do.

But he didn't just help Arias slander and vilify Travis with vicious and vile lies, he perpetuated and exaggerated those lies with the constant repetition of each hateful accusation in questioning every witness, using each defense witness to agree to and support these hateful allegations. Every sentence, it seemed, from his mouth included a sexual reference to Travis, each one more vile and disgusting, ensuring jury members never went a day without hearing the defense perversion of Travis' character.

Just in case the public had forgotten that Arias was the real victim, that Travis was a deviant and controlling abuser, that the prosecutor was unethical and a liar, that state witnesses such as Dr. Horn were liars, this defense team of shady and unethical attorneys, client and mitigation specialist are using the media which they so loudly and publicly cry foul of to spin a web of lies accusing everyone of malfeasance: the prosecutor lied, the prosecutor withheld evidence, the prosecutor bullied and harassed witnesses, the detective's wife was involved in spreading a malicious hate campaign as well as using privileged information, the detective shared privileged information with his wife, the state as a whole had created a "circus" atmosphere making a fair trial impossible. (Remember, Nurmi didn't ask that his ridiculous 59 page motion/manifesto be sealed, allowing the media to immediately publish it with every lie and accusation printed in black and white, but he requested and was granted the motion to have the state reply only in sealed proceedings.)

Inevitably, given the defense tactics, the purported disgusting letters were once again a popular topic, getting the message out to the public that at the very least there was some proof of Travis' pedophilia and abuse of Arias, proof that once again the state was fighting against. Nurmi pulled out all the stops with his accusations, assuring the lurid details of the Arias lie were once again front and center. Then, coincidentally (ha ha) this article by Keifer, stirring up the death penalty debate and how seemingly unfair it is for the mean old state to insist on, despite the many examples he gave of other murderers getting off with much lighter sentences......not to mention the slanting of these facts to paint Martinez as the prosecutor who decided singlehandedly to doom poor Arias with a death penalty and with no offers of a lighter sentence.

So I suppose Nurmi is doing his job, if one has a loose interpretation of what that job is and how it can be done. IMO. In the last few weeks he has publicly unleashed his latest tantrum/hate campaign toward the state, made spurious allegations, and once again smeared and spat on the reputation of Travis Alexander.

If you really want to be repulsed by Nurmi, go check out his law firm and what area of the law he practices.... He defends child molesters and rapist. This is why he wanted off the case. His new law firm was just opening and he'd lose money on defending Jodi, so he got extra pay from the citizens of Maricopa county, so it would be such a hardship on him. But he sure is patting himslef on the back about being tied to Jodi .

[URL="nurmilaw.com/about/[/URL]


Jennifer Wilmont is s public defender than trains trial layers for court. What can I say.


anyway when you get to the interviews of Jodi singing the song is from Dido. Jodi was said to of hid in Travis's closet and watch him sleep.


[video=youtube;0dKZQs1xekY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=0dKZQs1xekY[/video]

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

294 revolutions of the earth brings us to today, October 19, we'll see the sun rise and sunset for 71 more days.


1814 - Baltimore, MD, was the first documented performance of "The Defence of Fort McHenry" with music took place at the Holliday Street Theatre. The work was later published under the title "The Star-Spangled Banner."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ZaMxB8lcaug


1871 - British General Charles Lord Cornwallis surrendered to US General George Washington at Yorktown, Virginia . It was to be the last major battle of the American Revolutionary War.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=O8Xs4T1bREg


1944 - The play "I Remember Mama" opened on Broadway. Marlon Brando made his debut with his appearance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=QQ6ViWdh8qM


1945 - Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon form the Arab League to present a unified front against the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzNuoeCwOAM&feature=player_detailpage


1959 - Patty Duke made her Broadway debut in "The Miracle Worker." The play lasted for 700 performances.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lUV65sV8nu0



1973 - Ringo releases "Photograph"


[video=youtube;3MubU8qHutY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=3MubU8qHutY[/video]



1977 - Charter plane crashes in Mississippi, killing three members of popular Southern rock band Lynyrd Skynyrd, along with their assistant road manager, the pilot and co-pilot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Ek5Rp5Dd8TA


1988 - Roxette releases the album Look Sharp"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=k2C5TjS2sh4


2014 - life is still hard on planet Earth

 

[neesaki]

TrialWatcher...Arias has done the cut throat motion many times. Here are two more instances:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psHxJ01pqoI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLxNbzveMyY

ETA: She should never be free, I agree. She loved killing Travis and she will do it all over again to the Hughes, Mimi, Deanna, Juan Martinez, Demarte, Judge Stephens...her list gets longer every week.

In the first video, I just can't tell, it appears more or less ambiguous. But in the second, it appears quite deliberate. :scared: JMO Regardless, I have no doubts about her guilt. She needs to Go. Away.

 

[neesaki]

Thanks for the clips, Rose. I just watched them again. Juan Martinez and Detective Flores must be towards the top of her kill list now. The throat cutting gesture is almost a physical tick. She is evil enough to use it intentionally but it appears to be instinctive body language. She is running her 'triumphant' final slice through her head.

You have a point, a 'tick', such as in some type of Tourette's disorder. Just think how many times she must have thought about, obsessed about, practiced this. Before she actually committed this horrific crime.

 

[Renee110]

JA has a new tweet. A quote that Malcolm X said about the media having the power to make the innocent look guilty and the guilty, innocent. They control the mind by masses.

I agree that the media can do that but not in this case.

She makes me burn up. She and her defense are so righteous about wanting to sequester, and wanting/needing to know jurors twitter handles and FB info so they can make sure that no-one is reading what they shouldn't, or posting what they shouldn't, and she is doing her level best to put out there crap like this hoping they will read it and have doubts planted in their minds. She makes me so sick.