SIDEBAR #32 - Arias/Alexander forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nancy Grace @NancyGraceHLN
Counsels have argued their case. Decision to be made by this afternoon. #JodiArias


Jeffrey Evan Gold @jeffgoldesq
Court of appeals will rule on #JodiArias secret trial sham later today.Lets hope #justice prevails in AZ today.
 
One juror had family emergency I thought, unavoidable. The 2 nd juror had personal knowledge of The felon from relatives an in moo this was a set up to try and get a mis trial....

Yep, Nurmi is grasping at straws. Loosing jurors is part of the checks and balances. If there is bias or misconduct, they should be "lost".
 
Mark Henle ‏@HenleMark 2m2 minutes agoMesa, AZ
Judge Portley asks def. attorney Kirk Nurmi (left) a question in AZ Court of Appeals for #JodiArias hearing.

B1iajL7IEAAEbYG.jpg
 
I've got to remove my rear from the computer for a while........be back later!!!!!

:seeya:
 
These threats.....first, if someone was going to do harm, they could do it after when video comes out to the public would be released....the felon would have her sentence and public would have moved on. Since we have not seen threats.....just word of mouth, are some people reading into them more. If threats, PD would know who they are, charge them.

Second...what about the felons threats to JM from inside jail and others and the knife cut across throat motion....is the felon not threatening but she is special nothing happens to her....

Why different standards for the felon? where is her punishment?

I don't think the defense likes being under the microscope. JMOO
 
Thank you, Bernina! I am late, so hope to get caught up. What a sight to see you are here and posting (did I remember wrong that you weren't supposed to be here today?) :happydance:

Not feeling so well today, so I will probably be popping in and out. Fingers crossed for an answer to the media hearing ASAP!
 
Mystery witness speaks at Jodi Arias sentencing trial

http://video.foxnews.com/v/38726621...at-jodi-arias-sentencing-trial/#sp=show-clips
-------------

----------------------
Public trial

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution establishes the right of the accused to a public trial.

The right to a public trial is strictly enforced, but is not absolute. Trials may in exceptional cases be regulated. Closures are decided case-by-case by the judge evaluating a claimed danger to a substantial or legitimate public interest. But whatever the interest at stake, the likelihood of danger to that interest must meet a "‘substantial probability’ test".[1] Examples of cases presenting closure issues include organized crime cases (overall security concerns), rape cases (decency concerns), juvenile cases,[2] and through the Silent witness rule and/or Classified Information Procedures Act, cases involving sensitive or 'classified' information.[3]

Trials may be closed at the behest of the government only if it can show "an overriding interest based on findings that closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest".[4] The accused may also request a closure of the trial; in such a case, it must be demonstrated that "first, there is a substantial probability that the defendant's right to a fair trial will be prejudiced by publicity that closure would prevent, and second, reasonable alternatives to closure cannot adequately protect the defendant's fair trial rights".

But before a judge can close a courtroom, the judge must consider all potential alternatives to closure. This is a very strict standard; the Supreme Court has held that "trial courts are required to consider alternatives to closure even when they are not offered by the parties," or by anyone else.[5] In other words, a judge who does not want to be reversed on appeal must be confident that there cannot possibly be any alternative to closure that might later be conjured up by some appellate lawyer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_trial

Silent witness rule

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_witness_rule
 
2m2 minutes ago
#Jodiarias..."We would like to #Sequester everyone on #Earth except the #Jury"...

4m4 minutes ago
How dare Nurmi face Appeals judges with claims of threats when Willmott DECLINED an invesitigation into threats #JodiArias

Dave Erickson ‏@ericksonvision 3m3 minutes ago
Lunchtime @ #JodiArias court. Meantime #ICYMI...
Let's Play Mystery Date! | Arias: Stories From The 3rd Row http://www.fromthethirdrow.com/post/101654758312/lets-play-mystery-date …

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 9m9 minutes ago
David Bodney did a great job! Ok join us at http://TrialTalkLive.com at 2pm ET for more info #JodiArias

Jodi Arias Diary ‏@JodiAriasDiary 2m2 minutes ago
#JodiArias Dear diary: Back to court after a long Halloween weekend. I'm tired of going as a convicted murderer every year.
 
Jodi Arias’ Defense Attorney Gets Death Threats: ‘We Will Find You, We Will Kill You’
Posted on Apr 24, 2013 @ 15:15PM

"...In a chilling voicemail, a sinister caller warned Phoenix, Arizona-based lawyer Jennifer Willmott: “You don’t have to return my call, but I’m just telling you: If Jodi, if you get her off of the death penalty, we will find you. We know where you’re at; we will kill you.”...

A transcript of the phone call, obtained by The Arizona Republic, goes on to reveal that the caller said, “I told Alyce the same thing, and we’re tired, and we’re sick and tired of you defending this person, and we will get you.”...

“It was not even credible,” said Deputy Chief Jack MacIntyre, who added that Willmott didn’t want to pursue prosecution and the investigation was closed..."



http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2...ttorney-death-threats-jennifer-willmott-kill/
 
:tyou: Bernina
&
:tyou: YESorNO for taking over with the tweets

:loveyou:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
FYI:

There is a new Twitter acct going by "Wild About Trials", it is NOT WAT, notice the "s" and the avatar is not WAT's.

I've got them blocked on my feed.

And my contractor is late, grrrr!
 
Am getting some bids for outbuildings, ie, loafing sheds. And monthly feed is being delivered too. What a Monday!:gaah:


I have never heard of a loafing shed.... but I need one so I can loaf in private! neat idea :thinking:
 
I find it rather ironic that one of CMJA's supporters inadvertently leaked the info. It's interesting how CMJA has such grandiose plans, but fails to see them through to completion due to lack of foresight. It's a pattern with her.
I don't think it was inadvertent at all. I think it was a purposeful leak, staged to look inadvertent. It screams red flag out to me.
 
Nurmi is a "criminal defense attorney" and he wants to moan about "threats"........isn't that kind of an oxymoron?
Show me the credible threats that were investigated and prosecuted, heck, show me the LE incident reports!

Could it be these "threats" were in the form of JM saying he would hit witnesses up for perjury?

COME ON!!!! This is sooooo lame!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
814
Total visitors
902

Forum statistics

Threads
625,988
Messages
18,518,004
Members
240,920
Latest member
LynnKC84
Back
Top