AZLawyer:
Isn't it against legal ethics and/or bar rules/regulations for an attorney to deliberately lie in a court of law?
In other words, Baez has basically come out and said that he knew of this information regarding the computer search for "fool-proof suffication" and, in my opinion, he also knew that it was Casey who initiated that search.
He then went into a court of law and outright stated that Caylee died in a drowning in the family pool and that George disposed of her body.
Given the timeline of when this search was made, and knowing that George was at work at that time, it would have been impossible for the story he related at trial to have had any validity, at all.
If he knew about this search, knew the timeline, and then went to court with his preposterous story of a drowning, then it appears to me that he lied in open court.
Perpetuating a falsehood in court is against the law, is it not? It is punishable by the local bar, is it not?
Am I missing something?