Sidebar for Caylee Anthony's forum #15

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #721
RBBM ...

sorry... wwwwwhaaatt? Caylee's murder was an INCONVENIENCE??? Did I read that wrong or am I just really really so that po'd that everything is heightening my emotion?

'true story' about reading the book in law school - my aunt fanny.

Now, does everyone see why I have no problem with Ashton's book? With a movie based on Ashton's book? With any chance Burdick will ever come out with a book? It's to counteract this kind of nonsense and sickness.

I may just have to be sick. honest to god.

I took it to mean the author, James Grippando, was saying that many of his fiction books were born from bad experiences aka "inconveniences", and so was his fiction book about Baez and FCA. The "inconvienience" happened when boycotters made an uproar over Grippando's book agent, Richard Pine of InkWell Management, talking to Baez about a book deal, and Grippando's agent Richard Pine, backed out of Grippando's collaberation with Baez on a NON-fiction book about FCA and Baez. Then Grippando's fiction book "Blood Money" was born.

http://rgazala.blogspot.com/2013/01/author-spotlight-james-grippando-returns.html
excerpt:
Gazala: What is the most surprising occupational hazard to being a novelist?

Grippando: Personal safety. I used to think you had to be a megastar like Salman Rushdie or Steven King to worry about such things, but that’s naïve. I want to be accessible to my readers, but there is risk in putting yourself “out there.” The good news is that each time I’ve had a bad experience, I’ve worked it into a book. My scare with a heckler at a bookstore became a scene in Lying with Strangers. When my identity was stolen (in part because so much info about me is publicly available), I used that experience in Money to Burn. And my most recent book, Blood Money, also grew out of one of these, shall we say, “inconveniences.” In the summer of 2010 I was wondering which way to go with my next work, and my agent called.
“I want you to talk to Jose Baez,” he said.
There was a hint of excitement in Richard’s voice, and I could tell that he wanted me to be just as excited. I disappointed him. “I feel like I’m supposed to know the name,” I said, “but I don’t.”
“Yes, you do,” said Richard. “He’s Casey Anthony’s lawyer.”

[clip]
"The backlash was overwhelming. Bloggers posted the agency’s contact information, urging readers to clog phone lines and e-mail boxes with a simple message: “NO WAY JOSE.” Simon & Schuster's Facebook page was hacked based purely on rumors (untrue) that the publisher was to sign a book deal with Anthony. In Oklahoma—twelve hundred miles from the Orlando courthouse—twenty-six year old Sammay Blackwell was run off the road and almost killed by a woman who thought Ms. Blackwell was Casey Anthony. I quickly realized that the book I wanted to write wasn’t a nonfiction account of a trial that was already overexposed. The story—my novel—was in the phenomenon that turns certain law-abiding citizens into vigilantes who will accept nothing but their own sense of “justice.”
 
  • #722
I apologize logicalgirl -- I intended no rebuff. Just thought I had made confusing statements in my previous post.

I agree that Baez has certainly benefited from his association with author James Grippando! Baez got a full length MSNBC "documentary" which is 100% supportive of Baez and his book, and that was, no doubt, as a result of his association with author James Grippando, who just happened to be on the same MSNBC network promoting his own book, which is a fiction book based loosely on Baez and FCA.

Since Grippando and Baez were not able to do their NON-fiction book on FCA case, they both benefited from Grippando's fiction book and being promoted by MSNBC. Baez got "something" out of this for sure!

Thank you - I was pretty clear about what you meant - it is just my suspicious nature that makes me suggest Baez always wants to be on the take - his version of networking could be - hey - this is great - everybody can pay me.

Whatever his association with Grippando is - it doesn't seem to be helping his own book.

As of this morning on Amazon:

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #104,673 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

 
  • #723
The entries from 2013 have been removed this am...... why?
Did you notice there was a change of address notice to the court on 12/10/2012? She moved to her new home for Christmas.... Considering she's 'indigent' she must still be finding suckers to pay her way!

VERY STRANGE that those entries were removed from the Clerk's site!!!
Wonder if those new documents had FCA's new address on them?
Steve Helling of PEOPLE says on Twitter that he is going to the courthouse today and will look at it.
 
  • #724
Originally Posted by LolaMoon08 This author made a grave mistake even mentioning the fact that he spoke with Jose and Jose made a grave mistake in promoting it. No one will buy it now. Had the author simply said the case caught his fancy and he wanted to follow up with a fairy tale, he might have been successful based on his reputation. His reputation is now void, IMO.

EXACTLY AND EXACTLY WHY I ABSOLUTELY (hahaha) HAD TO POINT THAT OUT!!!!!!!
:floorlaugh::great::floorlaugh:

THANK YOU sooooo much ANJ for bringing both of those articles to our attention!!!
You are a super sleuth!!!!
The Huffington article from the book critic on Grippando's fiction book "Blood Money", and the interview of Grippando about this book on the GAZALAPALOOZA blog which spotlights authors.

It was such a delightful surprise to read that Grippando and Baez were not able to do a non-fiction book on the case, and Baez was not able to use Grippando's book agent and had to go with lesser quality book ghostwriter and publisher for Baez' own book!!


post 688
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8729354&postcount=688"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Sidebar for Caylee Anthony's forum #15[/ame]
 
  • #725
The entries from 2013 have been removed this am...... why?
Did you notice there was a change of address notice to the court on 12/10/2012? She moved to her new home for Christmas.... Considering she's 'indigent' she must still be finding suckers to pay her way!


ZsaZsa
I noticed a Letter of Change of Address filed November 9, 2012 followed 5 days later by a letter from Cheney Mason then the Notice of change of address in December...
Below the December notice it says Defense Attorney...Did Chaney change his address? or did Mason file the Change on her behalf?

12/10/2012 Notice of Change of Address
Defense Attorney
11/14/2012 Correspondence
from Atty Mason
11/09/2012 Notice of Filing
Change of Address Letter

I find it curious that there is a letter from Chaney Mason following a letter for Address change.

IIRC her address during her time in jail and trial was Jose's Law firm so perhaps her address has been changed TO Mason's Law Firm..

OR if the address is where she really is living then perhaps Mason asked Privacy, not letting her address be known citing fear. from the public etc..


In regards to the now deleted 2013 entries..
1) Posting was a Clerical error
OR
2) the entries were deleted because the Gov't is no longer dealing with the collection of the payment...

When I worked for Gov't DMV and someone was sent to Collections to recoup payment...I don't remember seeing the notices in the person's record...They would show up with the Letter, we knew nothing about them being sent to collections. We had to tell them we were out of the picture and they had to deal with the Collection Agency now..
There was quite a bit of anxiety/fear once they learned they had to deal with the Collection Agnecy and not the Gov't.

I forgot if the Collection Agency paid the Gov't the outstanding amount and then they took over recouping the funds.

Either way Someone is gong to get a lot of communication from some very firm or aggressive collection agency employees.
 
  • #726
Thanks.
My guess would be they have removed these public records because the public are looking at them.... special arrangements for Casey continue...
 
  • #727
At least we have made a record of them before they were deleted.
 
  • #728
  • #729
  • #730
Isn't it sad that I haven't followed the appeal mess at all?? I don't know if I am just over it...or just too afraid that lying, thieving blankety blank will get off once again.
 
  • #731
Well gee...watching Lance Armstrong on Oprah...he really needs to meet the Anthony family
 
  • #732
Me either- and I don't want to read all through those posts to find out what they added to their evidence..... anyone here know?

I have to disagree, as I believe that those of us still here need to be more proactive or involved than ever as now many have fallen off the radar here on WS. I am so sorry that real life has a conflicting priority as a death of a friend has taken me to live away from home to care for the 85 year old wife continually for 30 days. I ask that all be e en more vigilant as to FCA these days... and for me, is there a basement chat as I desparetaly need one n now please for off topic to deal with my sepearate stuff


TIA.
 
  • #733
Thanks.
My guess would be they have removed these public records because the public are looking at them.... special arrangements for Casey continue...

Twitter:
Info Seeker ‏@Inquizzativ
@dmmcglynn @judyolafsen maybe ask @stevehelling to sort it out for us? What does she owe? What have payments been on? What is $23,663 for
Jan 16, 2013

Steve Helling ‏@stevehelling
@Inquizzativ @dmmcglynn @judyolafsen I'm heading to the courthouse shortly, and will take a look!
Jan 17, 2013

Steve Helling ‏@stevehelling
@judyolafsen @Inquizzativ @Blaiss @dmmcglynn I pulled the file and found no activity from this year. Last filing was a change of address.

Info Seeker ‏@Inquizzativ
@stevehelling @judyolafsen @Blaiss @dmmcglynn any idea why clerk removed the collection agency entries for January 15th? whose addr changed?
Jan 18, 2013

01/15/2013 Removed from Collection Program & Sent to Collection Agency
01/15/2013 Notice to Suspend Driving Privileges Done
01/15/2013 Case Sent to Collection Agency - Penn Credit Corporation


Steve Helling ‏@stevehelling
@Inquizzativ @judyolafsen @Blaiss @dmmcglynn The court was sending her documents to Baez's office; it was changed to Mason's
Jan 18, 2013

Steve Helling ‏@stevehelling
@Inquizzativ @judyolafsen @Blaiss @dmmcglynn She wrote a notarized letter to the court clarifying where correspondence should be sent.
Jan 18, 2013

Info Seeker ‏@Inquizzativ
@stevehelling @judyolafsen @Blaiss @dmmcglynn Why clerk remove 01/15/2013 Notice to Suspend Driving Privileges & collection agency info?

Steve Helling ‏@stevehelling
@Inquizzativ @judyolafsen @Blaiss @dmmcglynn No idea. But it's gone. Not in the file.
Jan 18, 2013
 
  • #734
OMG! I just read some of the more recent comments here...

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/en...013/01/casey-anthony-will-she-win-appeal.html

Some are really very funny.

PS- I didn't know that the State added something to their arguement after the fact. Is this true? Gosh, gone a couple of days and so much missed.


Comments from OS article:

TRJ@6:12pm-
Hi! Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure,Rule 28(J) provides as follows: “If pertinent and significant authorities come to a party’s attention after the party’s brief has been filed-or after oral argument-but before a decision-a party may promptly advise the Circuit Clerk by letter, with a copy to all other parties,setting forth the citations. The letter must state the reasons for the supplemental citations, referring either to the page of the brief or to a point argued orally. The body of the letter must not exceed 350 words. Any response must be made promptly and similarly limited.
**
Not sure what point the State may be referencing after the fact,but,it must be of some importance for them to do this.
Reply Posted by: Dinosaur | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 7:40 PM

My best guess dino is something many other great posters pointed out that was not called into question at the oral arguments. Melich did ask Casey if she knew she was there of her own free will and she agreed. That’s what I hope they are pointing out instead of some other law about Miranda rights.
If not, it might point to other case law where the time lapse of handcuffed vs not handcuffed meant the difference between under arrest or not. That seemed to be a big issue in those oral arguments.
Reply Posted by: Joemama | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 7:50 PM

The case law concerning the 5th Amendment is so voluminous, it’s mind boggling. It seems to me that it’d take time, familiarity with the minute details of the case, & a really good, specialized legal researcher to find on-point case law the first time ’round ! So I’m not surprised by a filing by the AG’s office; hopefully they found the needle in the haystack they were looking for to stamp the tramp once & for all. JMHO
Reply Posted by: FWIW | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 8:11 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://199.242.69.70/pls/ds/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2011&p_casenumber=2357&psCourt=5&psSearchType=
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket
Case Number: 5D11-2357
CASEY MARIE ANTHONY vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

01/16/2013 Notice of Supplemental Authority Attorney General - Appellee
 
  • #735
Comments from OS article:

TRJ@6:12pm-
Hi! Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure,Rule 28(J) provides as follows: “If pertinent and significant authorities come to a party’s attention after the party’s brief has been filed-or after oral argument-but before a decision-a party may promptly advise the Circuit Clerk by letter, with a copy to all other parties,setting forth the citations. The letter must state the reasons for the supplemental citations, referring either to the page of the brief or to a point argued orally. The body of the letter must not exceed 350 words. Any response must be made promptly and similarly limited.
**
Not sure what point the State may be referencing after the fact,but,it must be of some importance for them to do this.
Reply Posted by: Dinosaur | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 7:40 PM

My best guess dino is something many other great posters pointed out that was not called into question at the oral arguments. Melich did ask Casey if she knew she was there of her own free will and she agreed. That’s what I hope they are pointing out instead of some other law about Miranda rights.
If not, it might point to other case law where the time lapse of handcuffed vs not handcuffed meant the difference between under arrest or not. That seemed to be a big issue in those oral arguments.
Reply Posted by: Joemama | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 7:50 PM

The case law concerning the 5th Amendment is so voluminous, it’s mind boggling. It seems to me that it’d take time, familiarity with the minute details of the case, & a really good, specialized legal researcher to find on-point case law the first time ’round ! So I’m not surprised by a filing by the AG’s office; hopefully they found the needle in the haystack they were looking for to stamp the tramp once & for all. JMHO
Reply Posted by: FWIW | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 8:11 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://199.242.69.70/pls/ds/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2011&p_casenumber=2357&psCourt=5&psSearchType=
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket
Case Number: 5D11-2357
CASEY MARIE ANTHONY vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

01/16/2013 Notice of Supplemental Authority Attorney General - Appellee

BRBM

"stamp the tramp"
Best statement of the year!
I love it!
 
  • #736
I have to disagree, as I believe that those of us still here need to be more proactive or involved than ever as now many have fallen off the radar here on WS. I am so sorry that real life has a conflicting priority as a death of a friend has taken me to live away from home to care for the 85 year old wife continually for 30 days. I ask that all be e en more vigilant as to FCA these days... and for me, is there a basement chat as I desparetaly need one n now please for off topic to deal with my sepearate stuff


TIA.

They get hundreds of reader comments on Hal Boedeker's blog, many of them combative, a lot are just stupid, and of course the perennial troll stuff. The comments are not moderated. That is what I don't want to wade through. You have to read a lot of crap before you can find any factual information...
 
  • #737
From Jan 15th to Jan 17th, there is a $ 21.00 difference. Guess somebody made a payment?

Defendant ANTHONY, CASEY MARIE
Total Financial Assessment 23,663.34
Total Payments and Credits 19,509.43
Balance Due as of 01/15/2013 4,153.91

Defendant ANTHONY, CASEY MARIE
Total Financial Assessment 23,642.34
Total Payments and Credits 19,509.43
Balance Due as of 01/17/2013 4,132.91

Here is the $ 21.00 difference mentioned in the comments on the OS article -- (3) $7.00 payments were removed from the Clerk's site, along with all the collection agency entries and driving privileges entry.

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/en...l-she-win-appeal.html/comment-page-6#comments

Dino -
Reference the post last night about Casey’s account being turned over for collection… More has been added to it today as well as a bit more posted for yesterday’s date. Do you have any idea what might be going on with this? This is everything from yesterday and today – so far…
.
01/16/2013 Override Case Sent to Collection Agency – Alliance One
01/15/2013 Removed from Collection Program & Sent to Collection Agency
01/15/2013 Notice to Suspend Driving Privileges Done
01/15/2013 Case Sent to Collection Agency – Penn Credit Corporation
01/15/2013 Case Pending with Penn Credit Corporation
4153.91

Reply Posted by: The Real Judy | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 2:15 PM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dino -
All those entries I posted this afternoon are gone now from the trial case, the only one with a balance owing. The balance remains the same at $4,132.91. Guess it must have been posted to the wrong account. There were also three $7.00 debits to that account that have been removed. (Maybe the Clerk’s office reads Hal’s blog too! lol).
.
Found this on the DCA appeal this afternoon too…
01/16/2013 Notice of Supplemental Authority Attorney General – Appellee
Wouldn’t this be thought of as too little too late?
Reply Posted by: The Real Judy | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 6:12 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
O/T-State of FLorida v Anthony,Casey Marie (Criminal Case)
1/15/2013-Removed from Collection Program and sent to Collection Agency
1/15/2013-Notice to Suspend Driving Priveleges Done
1/15/2013-Case sent to Collection Agency-Penn Credit Corp

**
Jose Baez Facebook-”I really don’t know what to say about the Aphrodite show. Bizzare is the first thing that comes to mind. The things you have to go through to promote a book is ridiculous. As for those Judges,I have no comment other than I am glad we now call one of them Stan. Can you believe he was in charge of whether a person lives or dies? I cannot think of a better poster child for the anti-death penanlty movement”.
Reply Posted by: Dinosaur | Tuesday, January 15, 2013 at 7:38 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Cameron@8:08pm-Hi!! Think somewhere in the area of $4,000.00.
Reply Posted by: Dinosaur | Tuesday, January 15, 2013 at 8:04 PM

Dino 7:38- Thanks! Do you know the $$ amount that is owed and turned over to collection?
Baez, keep sticking your foot in your mouth—sooner or later your mouth and pompous attitude is going to do you in.
Reply Posted by: Cameron | Tuesday, January 15, 2013 at 8:08 PM
----------------------------------------------------------
 
  • #738
Comments from OS article:

TRJ@6:12pm-
Hi! Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure,Rule 28(J) provides as follows: “If pertinent and significant authorities come to a party’s attention after the party’s brief has been filed-or after oral argument-but before a decision-a party may promptly advise the Circuit Clerk by letter, with a copy to all other parties,setting forth the citations. The letter must state the reasons for the supplemental citations, referring either to the page of the brief or to a point argued orally. The body of the letter must not exceed 350 words. Any response must be made promptly and similarly limited.
**
Not sure what point the State may be referencing after the fact,but,it must be of some importance for them to do this.
Reply Posted by: Dinosaur | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 7:40 PM

My best guess dino is something many other great posters pointed out that was not called into question at the oral arguments. Melich did ask Casey if she knew she was there of her own free will and she agreed. That’s what I hope they are pointing out instead of some other law about Miranda rights.
If not, it might point to other case law where the time lapse of handcuffed vs not handcuffed meant the difference between under arrest or not. That seemed to be a big issue in those oral arguments.
Reply Posted by: Joemama | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 7:50 PM

The case law concerning the 5th Amendment is so voluminous, it’s mind boggling. It seems to me that it’d take time, familiarity with the minute details of the case, & a really good, specialized legal researcher to find on-point case law the first time ’round ! So I’m not surprised by a filing by the AG’s office; hopefully they found the needle in the haystack they were looking for to stamp the tramp once & for all. JMHO
Reply Posted by: FWIW | Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 8:11 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://199.242.69.70/pls/ds/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2011&p_casenumber=2357&psCourt=5&psSearchType=
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket
Case Number: 5D11-2357
CASEY MARIE ANTHONY vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

01/16/2013 Notice of Supplemental Authority Attorney General - Appellee
Thanks, TT! I wasn't sure I could bring it over.
oxoxoxox
 
  • #739
I went to see the court document through the link above and there is already another motion added on 1-17-13.
Not sure what it means.

01/17/2013 Motion To Strike Appellant 1/16 NOTICE OF SUPP AUTH
 
  • #740
Watching Lance on Oprah...what do he and FCA have in common besides a mulitude of lies (and sociopathy)? The propensity for using the word "absolutey" when denying lies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
153
Guests online
8,358
Total visitors
8,511

Forum statistics

Threads
633,677
Messages
18,646,293
Members
243,652
Latest member
Satoshi-Magnus
Back
Top