Simple question...

[Holdontoyourhat]

It really bothers you,I wonder why?Is it because it's so damn obvious that PR wrote the note?You're a coward.

Yeah you're right and the US Secret Service is wrong. Shuuuure.
Are one of these e's from PR exemplar? I recognize the style from the RN, I don't dispute that.

Save the verbal abuse for your family, K?

 

[BBB167893]

Thats BS. Most who look at it are led to believe PR wrote one and the other is from the RN.

That's not our fault.

I believe in a previous post you stated this letter comes from a disputed PR exemplar. Which one? Whats the big deal?

Where's the beef?

Have it your own way. The samples in question were compiled by document examiners who later identified PR as the writer in court. The one madeleine posted, along with many MANY others, were briefly incorporated into a book (which I have a copy of).

It really bothers you,I wonder why?Is it because it's so damn obvious that PR wrote the note?

:clap: A hit dog barks, madeleine.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Oh, now I get it.

What does 'briefly incorporated' mean? That it was a misprint?

I am very happy to have exposed this poll for what it is.

 

[BBB167893]

Oh, now I get it.

I wish you'd explain it to me sometime!

What does 'briefly incorporated' mean? That it was a misprint?

No, it was no misprint. It was used without the examiner's permission. A while back I posted a radio interview with said examiner where this was explored. This is just a guess, but I imagine you didn't listen to that interview. Real shame, too.

I am very happy to have exposed this poll for what it is.

And just WHAT might that be?

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

No, it was no misprint.

You know where this PR exemplar is, but you're not sharing? Is that it?

 

[BBB167893]

You know where this PR exemplar is, but you're not sharing? Is that it?

If memory serves, this one came from the "London Letter."

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

http://blabbieville.tripod.com/patsychart-rn2full2.gif
Is this the tabloid version from blabbieville?
http://blabbieville.tripod.com/

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

To attempt to answer question for other posters, the first 'e' might come from the word 'see' in 'if you want her to see 1997'.

The 2nd 'e' might come from the word 'execute' in 'until we execute the deed'. Presuming this tabloid fodder is legit.

Some of the e's are very similar. So are a lot of o's and i's and u's. Trouble is, the RN has more than the letter 'e' in it. To agree with RDI is to decide that PR chose to write her a's and u's in two completely different styles, one for the RN and the other for her left hand sample.

The writing of the RN is of significantly higher quality than PR's left hand exemplar. Did she forget how to write left handed? Did she get messier on purpose, deliberately change the styles of letters, and deliberately misspell advise?

 

[madeleine]

Oh, now I get it.

What does 'briefly incorporated' mean? That it was a misprint?

I am very happy to have exposed this poll for what it is.

And I am very happy this poll shows other very interesting things as well.One of them is the RST IS afraid of the RN and what it points to.And now with M.Fuhrman discussing his book and this case everywhere.....I kinda understand why the ham sandwich doesn't feel so safe at the moment.

 

[BBB167893]

http://blabbieville.tripod.com/patsychart-rn2full2.gif
Is this the tabloid version from blabbieville?
http://blabbieville.tripod.com/

It's possible. What's your point?

One thing is sure: those samplings were used in charts compiled by document examiners. That's where it's at.

To attempt to answer question for other posters, the first 'e' might come from the word 'see' in 'if you want her to see 1997'.

The 2nd 'e' might come from the word 'execute' in 'until we execute the deed'. Presuming this tabloid fodder is legit.

It is, far as I know.

Some of the e's are very similar. So are a lot of o's and i's and u's. Trouble is, the RN has more than the letter 'e' in it. To agree with RDI is to decide that PR chose to write her a's and u's in two completely different styles, one for the RN and the other for her left hand sample.

Funny you should say that, HOTYH. Because what madeleine posted was just the tip of the iceberg. It's too bad copies of that book I mentioned are so hard to come by, because I'd strongly suggest that you take a look. You'd have to scrape your jaw up off the floor, I can promise you that.

The writing of the RN is of significantly higher quality than PR's left hand exemplar. Did she forget how to write left handed? Did she get messier on purpose,

Well, it might not even be that, HOTYH. It could be any number of factors.

deliberately change the styles of letters, and deliberately misspell advise?

Couldn't tell you. All I CAN tell you is what I see. Like I've said a thousand times, I can't not see what my eyes see.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

And I am very happy this poll shows other very interesting things as well.One of them is the RST IS afraid of the RN and what it points to.And now with M.Fuhrman discussing his book and this case everywhere.....I kinda understand why the ham sandwich doesn't feel so safe at the moment.

You're right.

I see similarity between the e's. And I found them myself (I think). It probably would've been a lot easier if you'd provided the source for those of us who asked.

Still we have to consider the source (tabloid fodder) and they're the same tabloids that find aliens on Mars, right? I hope you pardon my skepticism with your source.

However the similarity is evident and deserves an explanation. But that explanation has to include why the u's and a's are of a completely different style, why PR misspelled advise, and why the quality of the RN writing is better than the quality of PR's left hand exemplars. The reason the explanation has to be more complex than your 'simple question' is because PR wasn't required to write one 'e', she had to write the entire RN. Thats the real, grown up question that your simple question on the 'e' doesn't answer.

 

[Beatrice]

I believe the killer of Jon Benet was the young man that commited suicide and next to him were weapons...One being a stun gun.

 

[DeeDee249]

I believe the killer of Jon Benet was the young man that commited suicide and next to him were weapons...One being a stun gun.

There is no DNA match to that person, nor was there any forensic evidence from him left at the crime scene.

 

[cynic]

Her analysis concluded that it was "highly probable" that Patsy Ramsey wrote the ransom note. She said there are over 243 points of similarity between a sample of Patsy Ramsey's writings and the ransom notes. "There are so many unique similarities between both writings."

[ame="http://www.forumsforjustice.org/forums/showthread.php?t=8837"]Exclusive Cina Wong Exhibit Charts - Forums For Justice[/ame]

 

[DeeDee249]

And that pretty much says it all...

 

[BBB167893]

And that pretty much says it all...

I'll say it does.

 

[Ravyn]

I agree with DeeDee this says all...And Thank you thank you very much as Elvis would say...But thanks muches for this ,cynic

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Wellll, I know better than to ask where these letters came from.

 

[BBB167893]

Wellll, I know better than to ask where these letters came from.

Why is that so important, anyway?

 

[Sophie]

Her analysis concluded that it was "highly probable" that Patsy Ramsey wrote the ransom note. She said there are over 243 points of similarity between a sample of Patsy Ramsey's writings and the ransom notes. "There are so many unique similarities between both writings."

Exclusive Cina Wong Exhibit Charts - Forums For Justice

Grief, when you look at the samples together like that, it's amazing...