I've read the posts from Day One, and I don't believe this was an abduction. Evidence suggests the girls were walking, not running. The bodies were found close together. There appears no evidence of an attack either, which probably means no DNA on the girls. The case is baffling, to say the least.
The 1st article (Fox) says the ME stated the girls were shot in the FACE and CHEST (vs Head and Body) - it says to me that they were walking (people saw them walking, they made no "SOS" call home) and were confronted by their killer - face to face.
I have to agree with Trino - Pedophiles don't kill kids they TRY to abduct - there is no reason - even if the person is KNOWN to the children why would he kill them - he hadn't DONE anything or touched them (their word against his) - there was no reason to kill the girls - especially in such a hideous (non-sexual) manner...pedophiles are usually trying to AVOID detection, not openly invite onlookers or witnesses. Multiple gunshots (extreme overkill) is certainly not the MO of a pedophile. If the killer is the POI--- well the POI was standing or sitting outside his vehicle - a vehicle OPENLY and OBVIOUSLY parked askew in the road - not skulking around in the bushes hiding himself from public view.
This killing says to me:
ONE Killer
-The Killer was an adult - at least 20 years old
-The Killer was serious about killing both girls - multiple shots, 2 firearms, no doubt the girls were dead when he left
-The Killer was not nervous - or inexperienced - this killing was ugly - young girls, multiple gunshots, up close, in their face, and it wasn't "silent" or "clean" - head/face shots?? Those are bloody and ugly and nasty...they sicken even experienced LE officers
-The Killer felt "justified" - almost a feeling of vengeance, vigilante justice, or settling a score here. The killer left "piles" of bullet casings lying in the road where he stood and shot these girls. It seems so personal, so targeted, so blatantly "screw you" somehow. There was anger, but it was controlled anger - he didn't just spray bullets everywhere - every shot was targeted to kill...not maim, not warn, not hurt...KILL. And he didn't leave until he was sure the girls were dead...even though it might have taken longer and risked detection or getting caught.
-The Killer felt it was more important that the girls were dead, than it was to not be observed or caught or clean up any evidence. I think the casings just weren't a concern - this killer came with one or two "throw away guns" (premeditated). The killer had to know how busy that road was - and he was seen by someone because the POI was seen by several people - and he just didn't care. It also tells me that he didn't worry about being recognized - like he wasn't from the area and was not associated with either family in any way.
My instincts tell me that the killer targeted Taylor and Skyla - but in my mind the target might not specifically have been them - as in personally Taylor and Skyla. It could have been that the Killer was
- mad at a similar girl or girls
- or he was targeting one of the girls over a problem with someone (not immediate family) associated with one family
- or maybe he is delusional or mentally ill and one of the girls reminded him of someone else - a daughter or a sister
- or maybe he was delusional or mentally ill and thought the girls were "bad or "evil"
I just get that feeling that the Killer was shooting and shooting - like once he started he couldn't stop until he had emptied two guns. Almost like he had a "fit" and when it was over, he was calm and "normal" again and just got in his vehicle and drove away. Now if it is true that there were "execution" shots under the chins of the girls I would lean more toward a killer who knew at least ONE of the girls or her family and the family was the general target.
Otherwise, I am not sure that in the Killers mind, he killed Taylor and Skyla - he may believe he killed something "evil" or someone who abused him or was responsible for some death or loss in his life. Maybe the Killer (in some delusional, even drug addled state) blames one of the girls (or in general maybe girls from their school or area?) for (choose one) his divorce, his wife leaving him, losing custody of his kid(s), his child's death, his childs illness, losing his home, losing his job etc etc etc. I seems to me, the Killer almost tried to "erase" the girls as individuals and make them (in his mind) representative of some bigger evil he was compelled to eradicate and killing them with such "force" gave the Killer relief from something inside him.
I believe there must be SOME link between the Killer and one of the girls or her family, OR a link between the Killer and something the girls were generally a part of or represented to the Killer. I don't think both the location and the victims were "random" - either he was after a family OR he was after a "look" or area or an organization or something the girls represented to him personally.
My Opinion