PrimeSuspect
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 10,594
- Reaction score
- 19,745
Not long now before we know what the judge intends. I do hope she doesn't throw the case out. There are many questions that cause concern and I really want to hear what SD has to say. I think you all know that I find believing newspaper reports alone very difficult. I don't want to see a guilty man freed but equally I don't want to see a man convicted on anything but factual evidence.
I have been rereading the SA court proceedings so far and am troubled by certain facts. One which I have mentioned before is that I think it very odd indeed that the money was never mentioned until fairly late on but to counter that I ask myself if he wanted out of the relationship (purportedly said to the German master) why did he not take advantage of one of the three occasions that Anni broke off the engagement. All he had to do was walk away at that point but as far as I can see it was he who wanted the relationship to continue. That, to me, is not indicative of somebody who wants the relationship over and done with by arranging a murder.
I know I have mentioned before, divorce by Hindus who have been born/educated in Europe, and have become affluent, is not uncommon when they are unhappy with their marriage. We see plenty enough in the UK. If you remember Anni had on a number of occasions mentioned divorce. There is not the stigma attached to it as once there was, unless one still lives in India where it is viewed differently, as it is between uneducated Hindus.
I see him, and he admits it, as a control freak and perfectionist but also we hear that Anni has quite a temper (rather like her father) and was very argumentative. There was no dowry and SD is financially very secure - so money doesn't enter into the equation AFAICS.
I agree somewhat, but I have this niggling feeling which I admit is influenced by the Hindu Indian community, that SD was pressured to pursue Anni for marriage.
When SD's family first met up with Anni's family in his parent's home, his sister-in-law came down the stairs with a bowl of flowers (a tradition meaning a marriage proposal) which surprised Anni. Imo, that seems forceful, putting her on the spot. There just seemed to be too much pressure and influence by these families. SD did go to temple, he did publicly honour his Hindu traditions which were in odds with his lifestyle, a risk he'd taken for many years.
In the transcript, Preyen Dewani, imo, appears to be 'normal' even though he made the racist comments. SD is racist too, (an inverted racist which shouldn't be ignored). Preyen asks the right questions like an ordinary person but he supposedly tried to get hold of the CCTV footage of SD meeting Tongo. Did he do this for his brother or for his parents (who must be pretty broken up)?
So to cut to the chase, imo, it's about freedom, at any cost. If Anni's murder was never solved, SD would go to temple as a grieving widower, continue to have gay relationships secretly, and never be pressured again to marry. Maybe, it's that simple. :dunno:
If we look at the alternative, it's a wonder SD's survived this long, he's traveled to Egypt, Uganda, Kenya, USA, France, India etc, and he hasn't been mugged? He explains to his brother in the recording about having the same driver everyday in Cape Town, I thought his brother was genuinely confused. Imo, this is why he doesn't admit that Tongo accompanied him to the money exchange, only a fool would allow a stranger to witness wads of cash in their wallet. SD too trusting and naive? That flies in the face of a control freak. :tantrum:
JMO