- Joined
- Oct 27, 2016
- Messages
- 2,243
- Reaction score
- 9,663
I blame Bear Grylls for that, but you are probably right.When you're wearing a full overnight pack, it would not at all occur to you that it would float. Trust me on this....![]()
I blame Bear Grylls for that, but you are probably right.When you're wearing a full overnight pack, it would not at all occur to you that it would float. Trust me on this....![]()
My mind keeps dragging me back to that comment she made about taking "a dip into France." (Paraphrasing).
Wouldn't be surprised if she was found much lower on the mountain on that side, perhaps just a short distance off the trail. IMO
Hi @annpats. I agree with you. I don't want to belabor this point, but I do think its important for us sleuthers to have some facts about suicide-by-drowning in hand.
"According to the CDC, more than 44,000 people commit suicide each year in the U.S., with firearms and suffocation as the leading causes. Just over 1 percent of suicides are attributed to drowning, and in 2015, 509 people killed themselves this way, CDC numbers show."
There may be more scientific journals to quote from, but in my haste (dinner time!) I was able to at least find this factoid, albeit old numbers.
Source: Suicide by drowning uncommon but does happen, investigators say
Yes, @sarahboirin, we are in agreement.With respect, people commit suicide using the means they have available to them. Firearms are more readily available in the US and are more often used. If that was Esther's intention, and we don't know this, she would have used the means available to her, so drowning has to be considered IMO
Snipped for focus"On the basis of what I've read, she doesn't sound like someone with depression, so suicide just doesn't add up in my mind. I could be wildly wrong.
Snipped for focus
Welcome @19thcenturynovel to Websleuths! We were all new at one point.
Everyone's perspective is meaningful, even if we don't all agree. If we all agreed then this wouldn't be sleuthing, right?
That said, since you are new to this case and have formed an opinion about whether ED was suicidal, I encourage you to carefully review our 8 months of discussion over 5 threads. There have been many of us who have dissected a slew of data points and concluded ED could have been suicidal and that she could have been suffering from a major depressive episode in October / November 2020. Of course we can never diagnosis someone and we may never know if she was, but there is a lot to consider.
If you haven't done so already, an easy way to focus on past WS discussions regarding a topic in the ED case, such as "suicide", is to search each of the 5 threads for the word suicide and then read each of the posts that come up from that search. I just ran a search for each thread (see below for an image of the utility I used).
Thank you, RedHaus. I guess I've got some homework to do and I'm sad to hear of that possiblity.
The following is a summary of ED posts that mention the word "suicide":
- Thread #1: 15
- Thread #2: 2
- Thread #3*: 46
- Thread #4: 59
- Thread #5: 44 (so far)
TOTAL: 166Those 166 posts include a rich discussion of the facts as we know them. And I believe it represents a fairly balanced discussion with all sorts of opinions on the matter. Once you review our past discussions and perhaps review the primary data on your own (e.g. ED's and ED/DC's FB posts going back to September / October, 2020), let us know what you think. And I want to be clear, that IMO, this is just one of several possible outcomes for poor ED. I remain open to many different scenarios.
* It was in Thread #3 when we broke the ice and started openly discussing the possibility ED committed suicide... it took a leap of faith that WS would let us. So if you had to prioritize due to time constraints, I'd suggest the 46 posts in Thread #3 may be the most productive to read.
View attachment 305372
That piece of info pricked up my ears, as well. He was surprised he could get a signal... Was it because Esther said she couldn't? Maybe she just wanted a break from having to respond. If I want to put distance between myself and a loved one (for a myriad of reasons) I'd rather be more spontaneous about digital communication, and could imagine fibbing that I couldn't reply due to circumstances beyond my control. IMOI still dont think she suicided and I keep coming back to Dan's surprise that he could get a signal up there when esther had told him otherwise.
She appeared reluctant to return as she kept delaying it. Dont care what she said to Dan about missing him. Her actions did not match her words.
"Dip into France" seems like a rather ghoulish joke to make if she was contemplating such a course of action (drowning in the lake). People with suicidal intentions don't always reveal their depressed state of mind and in fact, can appear happy prior to the event because they have already made the decision. But why would she commit suicide? She was a well educated, attractive woman who could have built another future for herself. If she felt stifled by the relationship, she had a supportive family back home where she could have sought temporary refuge. She wasn't a person out of options. If she had succumbed to actual depression then that can play cruel tricks with the mind. On the basis of what I've read, she doesn't sound like someone with depression, so suicide just doesn't add up in my mind. I could be wildly wrong.
Welcome to WS, @19thcenturynovel,
Our Redhaus has written so clearly of earlier discussions about the possibility Esther suffered from depression, and perhaps wanted to leave this realm, yet a particular sensitivity of mine demands that I also respond to your words.
My intention is not to censure you, but rather suggest another viewpoint. I do so believing it may be of value in some unknown, present or future experience of someone who may read this.
Please consider the fact that well educated, attractive women (and men, and children) do choose to end their lives, notwithstanding a wealth of options available to them.
We cannot ever be certain whether or not another being is irretrievably lost in their own dark time.
I took a break from this thread and has hoped that Esther would be found when I returned. I have great sympathy for Dan but I also feel frustration with his public statements. I’m reminded of a lyric from a sing…”What’s too painful to remember, we simply choose to forget.”
He seems obsessed with his own narrative…which might, under ordinary circumstances, be harmless. But in this case, his insistence on HIS interpretati0n of their relationship, her route, her plans, her words and her actions…as if her autonomy and her emotions were his possessions…is most unhelpful IMO.
For experienced hikers/climbers out there, how likely is it, in your opinion, that should ED have had an accident, none of her belongings would have been found, even some ways off trail? I would imagine that the areas surrounding the expected trail would have been searched. No yellow tent? Nothing?
My question is: Does this likely mean that they are searching in the wrong area -that she went another way than to the Refuge de Venasque, etc.- or is it still fairly likely that her remains/belongings are tucked away in brush, etc.
I just find that lack of any trace of her or any of her belongings -not a shoe, pole, etc., amazing. But maybe that's my inexperience talking.
See I believe most hikers who are not found are day hikers, not overnight or adverse weather hikers. I don’t believe she had poles, so wouldn’t expect them to be found, but she has shown in previous photographs a waterproof wrap over the backpack which would tear or come loose, likewise she wasn’t wearing thick clothing- so that would surely tear leave remains. The only reason it wouldn’t be seen is within a shortfall behind rocks.Pretty sure it's been covered up-thread that quite a number of hikers have disappeared without any trace in the Pyrenees over the years, some found many years later. I am a moderately experienced hiker so, without wanting to steal the thunder of the more experienced resident hikers who will be able to give more detail, I would just venture to suggest it's a strong possibility that she, or any belongings, might not be found for a long time.
Sadly, hikers disappear all the time. When the reason is found, it’s nearly always something small. A hiker stepped off the Appalachian trail for a bathroom break, could not find the trail, got disoriented, and was recovered 14 days later 7 miles away. Just over a week ago, an experienced ultra-marathon runner ran out onto an easy set of trails in Pleasanton California and they are still searching as I write, a frustrated SAR captain remarked “We should have found him by now”.For experienced hikers/climbers out there, how likely is it, in your opinion, that should ED have had an accident, none of her belongings would have been found, even some ways off trail? I would imagine that the areas surrounding the expected trail would have been searched. No yellow tent? Nothing?
My question is: Does this likely mean that they are searching in the wrong area -that she went another way than to the Refuge de Venasque, etc.- or is it still fairly likely that her remains/belongings are tucked away in brush, etc.
I just find that lack of any trace of her or any of her belongings -not a shoe, pole, etc., amazing. But maybe that's my inexperience talking.
See I believe most hikers who are not found are day hikers, not overnight or adverse weather hikers. I don’t believe she had poles, so wouldn’t expect them to be found, but she has shown in previous photographs a waterproof wrap over the backpack which would tear or come loose, likewise she wasn’t wearing thick clothing- so that would surely tear leave remains. The only reason it wouldn’t be seen is within a shortfall behind rocks.