Agreed...if that was true, it wasn't normal.SleuthingSleuth said:I myself feel less concerned about the bedwetting per se, and more about the defecation problems I've heard Jonbenet was having.
If that was so...that really wasn't normal.
I have heard of this before, also, however I haven't been able to find any real confirmation on this. I know that Patsy was being questioned along those lines in one of the interviews...and Patsy herself replied something to the effect of it wasn't an issue of her actually soiling her pants, it was more of a wiping issue, i.e., young children don't wipe as well and thoroughly as they should. So there would be evidence of that (skid marks) in her panties at times. That is completely different than actually defacating in ones pants.
Now, other people have posted that she did, in fact, have a problem of soiling her pants, and the poster said that statement came from someone that said JonBenet did soil her pants. I forget who the person was who made the statement, maybe some therapist or medical doctor, but they weren't someone who was integral in the investigation, or even involved in the investigation at all. It wasn't from anyone who would have first hand knowledge of this or anything else in the case. So, I surmise that it is just more unfounded inuendo--there is no shortage of that in this case.
The housekeeper reportedly said that she saw JonBenets panties soaking in the sink on occasions--but she didn't say it was because JonBenet had a habit of defacating in her pants. It could very well be that they were soaking due to stains from ineffective wiping.
Now, I'm sure if I am wrong, somebody will correct me. As I said, I haven't seen any report validating the soiling issue from someone who would actually know---only from 3rd parties who aren't involved, and the ever famous he said that she said that he said, etc.
Until proven otherwise, I have to believe that the occasional ineffective wiping turned into full blown defacation and soiling episodes by some who, for whatever reason, wanted their 15 minutes of fame to be quasi-associated with this case or had an entirely different agenda altogether.
Just my opinion & it can be changed with something tangible & substantial coming from the mouth of someone who would have reason to know...so if anyone has that, I would love to see a link...
