Stacy Ann Peterson, Bolingbrook IL #9

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #321
  • #322
You guys, IMO, Cassandra needs to stay off the Stacy site. You know her posts will probably used against her now.
I totally agree and have been thinking that for awhile now. She needs to not
be posting at all unless it has to do with search announcements or the like.
 
  • #323
Because he didn't realize that Cassandra would be such a powerful source in thrusting this investigation forward. He thought that he could say she ran off and assumed that Cassandra might think that was possible because of the marital problems, the counseling, Stacy wanting a divorce. He would answer Cassandra's call thinking it added to his aliabi.
He never counted on Cassandra's quick uptake on what was really happening that night. He never thought the police would persue this once they heard his side or take this any further..afterall he is an upstanding police officer..inforcer of the law.

oh DD,
I think you hit the nail on the head. ;)
Imo, DP was so sure of himself, since he was a police officer of course, he felt that his story would be unflappable and he thought his alibi would be tight. He didn't count on Cassandra!
 
  • #324
Either way is bad. Holy cow, Drew and his attorneys have offended all women, men for giving them a bad name, people who take sleeping pills and antidepressants, people who go to church. Wow.

I forgot that Brodsky slammed the clergyman tonight too. He said the clergyman should keep everything in confidence so that tells us all about his character if he's telling anyone what Stacy told him!!! :rolleyes:
 
  • #325
From the NG transcript tonight:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/29/ng.01.html
(re the phone call from "Stacy" that Tom said he didn't answer)
OPPENHEIM: Well, the length of the phone call may be in dispute. The essence of the "Tribune" story made it sound like that Drew Peterson may have been trying to stage a phone call and make it seem that his wife, who is presumably alive, is giving him a phone call on the day she`s last seen.

However, I spoke to Joel Brodsky, who is the attorney for Drew Peterson, and he told me that that phone call lasted for four minutes, different from what was suggested in this story, that it lasted for a while, as opposed to not being picked up at all. I said, How do you know that the phone call was four minutes? And Brodsky said, I have reliable sources. And he said, If the media can use reliable sources, so can I.
 
  • #326
More:
Why, Dr. Marc Siegel, who is a New York internist and author of the book "False Alarm," would a big man like Drew need anybody to help him move a body?

DR. MARC SIEGEL, INTERNIST: Well, you know, Jane, one possible is that rigor mortis might have set in. If it`s within the first two or three hours of death, it`s actually a lot easier to carry. Now, the relative says the body was warm. We expect that because within the first 12 to 24 hours, you have algor (ph) mortis, a warm body. But within three hours, the body starts to get stiff. Almost impossible for one person to carry a stiff, dead body. That`s what makes me think that maybe it was within the first three hours.
 
  • #327
More from NG:
Let`s go back out to CNN correspondent Keith Oppenheim. What is the latest on the search, given all this?

OPPENHEIM: Well, they`re looking in a canal which is in Will County, about 15 miles away from where Drew and Stacy Peterson lived. Another tidbit I wanted to point out to you that I got today which was that it was confirmed to us that Drew Peterson called in sick on October 28, on the day that Stacy was last seen. And I asked the Bolingbrook Police Department spokesperson whether he thought that all the media pressure outside the Peterson home was a good thing, and he said, yes, that he did. And I said, did he think that Drew Peterson is a suspect. He said, absolutely.
 
  • #328
And I asked the Bolingbrook Police Department spokesperson whether he thought that all the media pressure outside the Peterson home was a good thing, and he said, yes, that he did. And I said, did he think that Drew Peterson is a suspect. He said, absolutely.


Well, well, well, me thinks the iceman cometh. lol
 
  • #329
I felt good when I read that too, philamena!

I also think it's ingenous (can't spell it!) that someone gave him a camcorder, frankly. He may just do something with it and screw up big time.
 
  • #330
I watched the repeat broadcast of Greta and listened carefully to what Joel Brodsky said..........

In regards to Cassandra and Stacy he put it in the form of a question. Why did Cassandra file a missing persons report at 4:00am? Why was Cassandra out running around at 4:00am? He said perhaps she (Cassandra) knew more about Stacy's habits than she's saying and she was waiting for the bars to close.

So Bordsky WAS slamming Stacy inferring that she goes out to bars until they close. I think Brodsky is doing all he can to make things worse and to make people angry. :furious:
 
  • #331
Yeah, Brodsky came off as a big time jerk tonight. He'd be better off not saying anything on behalf of his client! But that's ok. Talk all you want, Mr. Brodsky!
 
  • #332
You know what I think about Brodsky? I think that when (when, not if) Brodsky fails at being an attorney, he will become a politician. He is already practicing on slamming the "opposition"
 
  • #333
You know what I think about Brodsky? I think that when (when, not if) Brodsky fails at being an attorney, he will become a politician. He is already practicing on slamming the "opposition"

myster......i hope you don't mind, but can you tell me if i missed anything on Greta?....i don't expect you to totally catch me up, but was there anything new this evening...????
 
  • #334
myster......i hope you don't mind, but can you tell me if i missed anything on Greta?....i don't expect you to totally catch me up, but was there anything new this evening...????

Yes close_enough, Brodsky made some comments that could very well rival Drew P's comments. Go back one page on this thread. I don't have cable either, so I have been reading what the others have written and waiting on the transcript.
 
  • #335
I was just reading over at the family website, and there was a post that the Army Corp of Engineers is going to come in to help with the search!!!

Evidently the body of water they want to search (a canal) is a junkyard of debris that needs to be cleared, including old cars. So the Army Corp of Engineers is coming in to clear the canal. :)
 
  • #336
I felt good when I read that too, philamena!

I also think it's ingenous (can't spell it!) that someone gave him a camcorder, frankly. He may just do something with it and screw up big time.

Same here!
 
  • #337
A kind poster at Greta put the below link up to watch shows including Greta on your computer. I haven't had a chance to check it out yet though:

http://www.tvunetworks.com/
 
  • #338
From the NG transcript tonight:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/29/ng.01.html
(re the phone call from "Stacy" that Tom said he didn't answer)
OPPENHEIM: Well, the length of the phone call may be in dispute. The essence of the "Tribune" story made it sound like that Drew Peterson may have been trying to stage a phone call and make it seem that his wife, who is presumably alive, is giving him a phone call on the day she`s last seen.

However, I spoke to Joel Brodsky, who is the attorney for Drew Peterson, and he told me that that phone call lasted for four minutes, different from what was suggested in this story, that it lasted for a while, as opposed to not being picked up at all. I said, How do you know that the phone call was four minutes? And Brodsky said, I have reliable sources. And he said, If the media can use reliable sources, so can I.
Can't you leave a 4-minute voicemail?
 
  • #339
Can't you leave a 4-minute voicemail?

I wonder though, if Tom did answer the phone and talk to Drew. Drew involving Tom would make more sense if Drew needed a live person to answer on the other end. Otherwise, Drew could have just set his phone on silent and left it in his house while he went to Shorewood to call from Stacy's phone.
 
  • #340
Ok, let me ask. If you were Drew, where would YOU dump a body?

I'd dump a body by the closed down Division Street bridge as opposed to the 9th street bridge ANY day. Since it's a dead-end road that no one travels on and the area is HEAVILY wooded, the privacy there would afford him the luxury of taking his time disposing the body and he wouldn't have to worry about a passer-by seeing him there...

The 9th street bridge area is a residential area on the Lockport side, so depending on who was up around 11 p.m., someone MAY have seen him over there. On the Romeoville side, it's more industrial...

I think Drew didn't dump her into water, I think he buried the container, IMHO, and the perfect place to dig a hole would be near the defunct Division Street bridge because of the privacy and lack of traffic in the area.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
2,460
Total visitors
2,555

Forum statistics

Threads
633,049
Messages
18,635,596
Members
243,391
Latest member
Mtnmomma86
Back
Top