State releases Subpoena List, includes LA,CA and GA

[kew17]

No matter what, I do not think Cindy will ever be the one to answer any question that will put the final nail in her coffin. She loves her daughter, has lost her grand daughter & IMO will go to hell and back to "save" her. Cindy will take to her grave what she really knows.

ITA! But she won't have to. KC and the evidence will do that all by themselves. I think the additional witnesses will only be the cherries on top!

Does anyone know where I can find a link to the "actual" SA's list? I've been searching apparently, in all the wrong places. TIA!

 

[RR0004]

I think Cindy will do just fine. The prosecution will be gentle with her because she is the victim's grandmother and the defendant's mother. They don't want to lose the jury's sympathy by brow-beating grandma. I don't know where people are getting the idea that the SA would subpoena a witness and then beat them up on the stand. :doh:

I think it's a safe guess that BC is working with her on limiting her responses to the question asked - tell the truth and say no more than necessary to answer the question.

A daunting task to say the least...lol.

 

[RR0004]

I think many are forgetting that the A's have legal counsel, BC. He will coach them on exactly what to say and to say exactly what is in their depositions. In a way, I am glad the media has played a role in the early months of Caylee's disappearance because of all the coverage of CA/GA/LA in their version of talking heads, it will be extremely difficult for even BC to spin another version of the former versions :doh:. None of the A's can really stray far from what they have said on interviews or during the initial LE investigation.

Which is why BC was looking for immunity, limited as it may be.

Remember one cannot go around spouting that the sky is pink to every news outlet and to LE. Then at a legal proceeding turn around and say, I didn't say it was pink I said it had some pink in it, you weren't listening to me and you misunderstood what I was saying. I never said it was blue either.

It'll be interesting to see/hear GA's version of the last time he saw Casey and Caylee.

 

[RR0004]

I responded to the general atmosphere on this thread, which sounded very much like posters expect the state to shred Cindy. I don't think that will happen at all. I think the questions that are asked of Cindy will be very limited and that she will answer truthfully and to the best of her ability, as she has all along.

Oh, please tell me we're not going to hear more pizza stories!

 

[azwriter]

Cindy on the stand being questioned by the prosecution? Big Trouble.

 

[jandkmom]

I think Cindy will do just fine. The prosecution will be gentle with her because she is the victim's grandmother and the defendant's mother. They don't want to lose the jury's sympathy by brow-beating grandma. I don't know where people are getting the idea that the SA would subpoena a witness and then beat them up on the stand. :doh:

I think it's a safe guess that BC is working with her on limiting her responses to the question asked - tell the truth and say no more than necessary to answer the question.

I don't think that the prosecution will take it easy on her. They are there to speak for Caylee and if CA, GA and LA don't stand up and tell the truth, then I hope the SA goes extremely hard, grandparent or not.