raisincharlie
Racing Doesn't Lie
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2004
- Messages
- 16,856
- Reaction score
- 142
You know there is something missing in all this testimony. A description of Brad's clothing from the party on the 11th.
Another state witness with nothing important to add. Come on prosecution...time to bring on the evidence.
Sorry..maybe OT..however THIS IS A FIRST for me...I have never ever left a live streaming trial to do something that could have waited before!! LOL..I have now swept and mopped my kitchen floor, front foyer, and bathroom floors!! Man oh man..You have to understand..that the witness and examinations are so boring to give me the initiative to do such a thing :floorlaugh:
why are they so hung up on traces of blood ?
I don't believe Nancy's COD was determined by the 16th. Testing for blood is pretty much standard operating procedure, given the COD was not known, looking for indications of a struggle via blood should be conducted.
All the defense is doing is repeating everything already done in the prosecution side of the examination. All this lack of blood evidence means pretty much nothing.
BC inspired you?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.