State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-16-2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
Hi folks, just joined and just started following case.

Quick question.. What was determined to be the time of death for MY?

:wagon:


If I am not mistaken it is between midnight and 6am.
 
  • #462
I'm very knowledgeable. I'm commenting on this trial and what has been presented thus far. I never said drinking is a cause or excuse for abusers. Where in my post did you see that? I have not seen or heard testimony that Jason was a wife beater. Mental abuse, perhaps and MY didn't deserve this guy based on all we've heard about his affairs but so far I have not seen any domestic violence reports, testimony from doctors and/or her family or friends that MY was physically abused.

She may have been but how can one make that assumption based on nothing presented at this trial?

I don't think there is anyone here who can defend Jason's treatment of Michelle, on any level.
 
  • #463
The size 10 shoe does not discount the size 12 shoe in the same size and brand that JY owned. There are only so many coincidences that can occur. I don't have an explanation for the 10, but it does not erase the fact that JY owned a pair of shoes with the same print as the print in the house.

Plus, Jason may have wanted it to appear as if the intruders were trying to set Jason up, thus, Jason's size 12 at scene. (Reverse psychology-type thing)
 
  • #464
This witness is good.
 
  • #465
I agree with you. If it were Jason wearing those size 12 shoes, he not only would have disposed of the shoes, he also would have disposed of the bloody shoe print.

JMO

He disposed of the shoes. He just never figured that the investigation would uncover his purchase of the same brand/model of the shoeprint found at the scene. Hence the "donated to Goodwill" line and the coincidental purchase within days after the murder that he purchased a similar pair of shoes as the "missing" (meaning disposed) Hushpuppies.
 
  • #466
I'm very knowledgeable. I'm commenting on this trial and what has been presented thus far. I never said drinking is a cause or excuse for abusers. Where in my post did you see that? I have not seen or heard testimony that Jason was a wife beater. Mental abuse, perhaps and MY didn't deserve this guy based on all we've heard about his affairs but so far I have not seen any domestic violence reports, testimony from doctors and/or her family or friends that MY was physically abused.

She may have been but how can one make that assumption based on nothing presented at this trial?

BBM I didn't, nor did I say you said that. I'm just clarifying the point in case anyone thinks the only reason he assaulted Cargol was due to having been drinking.

And my knowledge regarding physical abuse of MY by JY is limited to my conclusions thus far about his murdering her on November 2, 2006. I haven't seen evidence that he did (or did not) physically abuse her prior.
 
  • #467
WOW, this man is knowledgeable and loves to talk. I wonder how many in the jury are following him.
 
  • #468
Break time:
 
  • #469
I'm so glad you were verified so now we know that what you say on here is to be trusted, from a legal point. :D

LOL,
fran

Always fallible, sometimes serious!
 
  • #470
Making a fool of oneself does not equate to going on a murderous rampage. I've tried to release eggplants back into the wild in the grocery store at 2 AM (don't ask....:floorlaugh:) and I will admit to making a complete fool of myself on more than one occasion....

I don't think Jason was a mean drunk - he was a stupid drunk. At least in public.

I would think alcohol would make him less able to pull this off, and work in the defense's favor if he'd had a few. He was def a life of the party guy (again - if by "life of the party" you mean peeing on the floor in front of people - which apparently is WAY more common than I would have ever guessed.......)

Oh what a sheltered life I lead.....

I agree with you.
 
  • #471
Are you watching live coverage on tv or online? Once truTV goes off where are you seeing it?
 
  • #472
  • #473
  • #474
He disposed of the shoes. He just never figured that the investigation would uncover his purchase of the same brand/model of the shoeprint found at the scene. Hence the "donated to Goodwill" line and the coincidental purchase within days after the murder that he purchased a similar pair of shoes as the "missing" (meaning disposed) Hushpuppies.

I have yet to see evidence that Young was wearing the shoes that made either bloody shoeprint.

JMO
 
  • #475
I wasn't suggesting anybody will excuse his behavior. I think the jury will disregard the incident because it happened long before his marriage, was with another woman and also while he was drunk. In contrast, the therapist's conversation with Michelle was shortly before the murder. She specifically said there was no physical violence in the marriage and the murder was incredibly violent.

JMO


Well, that COULD be possible that they would disregard because of the time lapse, but then you have that little email from him, just before MY was brutally murdered. I think that will bring it right back into the present tense of the time of the murder.

To be quite frank, IMHO, I think there was definitely something going on in JY's head during this time. MY pregnant, new job pressures, one quicky in his own home, one old fllame contacted, one visit to one of MY's sorority sisters in Florida, all within a frenzied time frame, just weeks before MY is murdered!

Good grief! You put it all that way, I think I found my hook!

JMHO
of course!
fran
 
  • #476
Making a fool of oneself does not equate to going on a murderous rampage. I've tried to release eggplants back into the wild in the grocery store at 2 AM (don't ask....:floorlaugh:) and I will admit to making a complete fool of myself on more than one occasion....

<snip>

Those things are worthless. I bought some and they never hatched.
 
  • #477
Thanks for the welcomes. Reason I asked was this..

Wouldn't the clothing MY was wearing (not normal bedtime clothes) make it more likely that the murder occurred closer to midnight or before she finally went to bed?

What did her friends/family say about her outfit and the likelihood she slept this way? I know my wife is very consistent in what she wears to bed, at least the type of clothes anyway.

FWIW, I'm on the fence with regard to guilt or innocence .
 
  • #478
I agree with you. If it were Jason wearing those size 12 shoes, he not only would have disposed of the shoes, he also would have disposed of the bloody shoe print.

JMO

How exactly does one dispose of a bloody shoe print? Cut away that section of carpet? I'm not trying to be snarky, I honestly don't follow you.
 
  • #479
Thanks for the welcomes. Reason I asked was this..

Wouldn't the clothing MY was wearing (not normal bedtime clothes) make it more likely that the murder occurred closer to midnight or before she finally went to bed?

What did her friends/family say about her outfit and the likelihood she slept this way? I know my wife is very consistent in what she wears to bed, at least the type of clothes anyway.

FWIW, I'm on the fence with regard to guilt or innocence .

It's tough to say, b/c apparently the HVAC was out side I think she had mentioned that it got pretty chilly for her at night. Plus she was 5 months pregnant, so that might have affected her habits.
 
  • #480
How exactly does one dispose of a bloody shoe print? Cut away that section of carpet? I'm not trying to be snarky, I honestly don't follow you.

Not to be nasty, but if the killer knew they were there and wanted to get rid of them, the pillow case could be taken of course and the carpet prints at least obscured by adding more of the substance that made them in the first place with some other object to mask the print.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
3,318
Total visitors
3,440

Forum statistics

Threads
632,575
Messages
18,628,633
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top