I'm loathe to say this, but this cross is so well done.
Wow! There are a bunch of Debbie Downers in here! I am going to, for the moment, have faith, and give the jury who is hearing this case for the first time the benefit of the doubt that they will weigh all the EVIDENCE that is being presented. Not the umms, not the dragging out the questions, the evidence. Television has really skewed the way people see the world. People are waiting for the AHA moment because that's what happens in "Law and Order," everything so cut, dry and dramatic!! Even on these stupid medical drama shows, people get false hope because they see some pretend surgeons successfully resect a brain tumor that is fatal 99.9% of the time. But people think that's how it works in real life. It doesn't. At the end of the day these jurors will weigh the evidence. And they will have to decide whether to discount the myriad of LIES this defendant has told, the coincidences that either prove he is a murderer or that he is the unluckiest man in the history of men, and decide his fate because that is our system of law. I am hoping they are diligent about their task and have no choice but to assume they are. Much will depend on the foreperson they elect because the last dude was a staunch NG, and he argued people to vote his way (wasn't it initially 6-6 then they deliberated more and it ended at 8-4?); also the Anthony foreman (I use the word man very loosely there), was a staunch NG that was able to persuade the others.
no confidence in that, im afraid.
Boz convicted BC....HC had a terrible closing.
we know what To expect from BH.
I feel for the Fisher family. They deserved much more.
I hate to keep comparing the BC case, and I'm sure Spivey is a great detective, but this testimony compared to Det. Daniels in that case is so different in terms of effectiveness, it's not even fair.
I watched the BC trial with almost all of you and I agree, he can't hold a candle to Daniels. O/T, but what was the hunky ones name?????????? He was too cute.
I watched the BC trial with almost all of you and I agree, he can't hold a candle to Daniels. O/T, but what was the hunky ones name?????????? He was too cute.
Wow! There are a bunch of Debbie Downers in here! I am going to, for the moment, have faith, and give the jury who is hearing this case for the first time the benefit of the doubt that they will weigh all the EVIDENCE that is being presented. Not the umms, not the dragging out the questions, the evidence. Television has really skewed the way people see the world. People are waiting for the AHA moment because that's what happens in "Law and Order," everything so cut, dry and dramatic!! Even on these stupid medical drama shows, people get false hope because they see some pretend surgeons successfully resect a brain tumor that is fatal 99.9% of the time. But people think that's how it works in real life. It doesn't. At the end of the day these jurors will weigh the evidence. And they will have to decide whether to discount the myriad of LIES this defendant has told, the coincidences that either prove he is a murderer or that he is the unluckiest man in the history of men, and decide his fate because that is our system of law. I am hoping they are diligent about their task and have no choice but to assume they are. Much will depend on the foreperson they elect because the last dude was a staunch NG, and he argued people to vote his way (wasn't it initially 6-6 then they deliberated more and it ended at 8-4?); also the Anthony foreman (I use the word man very loosely there), was a staunch NG that was able to persuade the others.
I watched the BC trial with almost all of you and I agree, he can't hold a candle to Daniels. O/T, but what was the hunky ones name?????????? He was too cute.
PY is such an enabler. I bet their finances are interestingly intertwined.