State vs. Jason Lynn Young 2-22-2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #681
I hate to keep comparing the BC case, and I'm sure Spivey is a great detective, but this testimony compared to Det. Daniels in that case is so different in terms of effectiveness, it's not even fair.
 
  • #682
Wow! There are a bunch of Debbie Downers in here! I am going to, for the moment, have faith, and give the jury who is hearing this case for the first time the benefit of the doubt that they will weigh all the EVIDENCE that is being presented. Not the umms, not the dragging out the questions, the evidence. Television has really skewed the way people see the world. People are waiting for the AHA moment because that's what happens in "Law and Order," everything so cut, dry and dramatic!! Even on these stupid medical drama shows, people get false hope because they see some pretend surgeons successfully resect a brain tumor that is fatal 99.9% of the time. But people think that's how it works in real life. It doesn't. At the end of the day these jurors will weigh the evidence. And they will have to decide whether to discount the myriad of LIES this defendant has told, the coincidences that either prove he is a murderer or that he is the unluckiest man in the history of men, and decide his fate because that is our system of law. I am hoping they are diligent about their task and have no choice but to assume they are. Much will depend on the foreperson they elect because the last dude was a staunch NG, and he argued people to vote his way (wasn't it initially 6-6 then they deliberated more and it ended at 8-4?); also the Anthony foreman (I use the word man very loosely there), was a staunch NG that was able to persuade the others.
 
  • #683
also we have yet to hear this "new evidence" that was alluded to right after lunch, correct?
 
  • #684
Oh man, clean up, aisle 2, clean up, aisle 2. I'm discouraged.......
 
  • #685
This is what I was afraid of with showing the previous testimony. He got to testify again without additional cross...and there were very few inconsistencies pointed out by Spivey. In my opinion, that was a horrible mistake. After watching the BC trial and this trial twice, I have no faith at all in the wake country district attorney office.
 
  • #686
I'm loathe to say this, but this cross is so well done.

It is because they are prepared and studied the case.

They did not even come on board until Jason was arrested,

Becky Holt was not only involved in the case since the very beginning,
it was said that she was the reason the arrest was held up for years.

Cummings has been involved on a lesser basis, until this year.

The other Pros lead was David Saaks, he was good !!
 
  • #687
Wow! There are a bunch of Debbie Downers in here! I am going to, for the moment, have faith, and give the jury who is hearing this case for the first time the benefit of the doubt that they will weigh all the EVIDENCE that is being presented. Not the umms, not the dragging out the questions, the evidence. Television has really skewed the way people see the world. People are waiting for the AHA moment because that's what happens in "Law and Order," everything so cut, dry and dramatic!! Even on these stupid medical drama shows, people get false hope because they see some pretend surgeons successfully resect a brain tumor that is fatal 99.9% of the time. But people think that's how it works in real life. It doesn't. At the end of the day these jurors will weigh the evidence. And they will have to decide whether to discount the myriad of LIES this defendant has told, the coincidences that either prove he is a murderer or that he is the unluckiest man in the history of men, and decide his fate because that is our system of law. I am hoping they are diligent about their task and have no choice but to assume they are. Much will depend on the foreperson they elect because the last dude was a staunch NG, and he argued people to vote his way (wasn't it initially 6-6 then they deliberated more and it ended at 8-4?); also the Anthony foreman (I use the word man very loosely there), was a staunch NG that was able to persuade the others.

amen mama-cita! :thanks: wasn't enough
 
  • #688
no confidence in that, im afraid.
Boz convicted BC....HC had a terrible closing.
we know what To expect from BH.
I feel for the Fisher family. They deserved much more.

I so remember HC's closing in BC case before his finger on the neck drama he was at the podium flipping through notes nothing in his thinking organized in no way did he paint the pic. or put anything together, like Boz did. I am very worried for this team's closing.
 
  • #689
I hate to keep comparing the BC case, and I'm sure Spivey is a great detective, but this testimony compared to Det. Daniels in that case is so different in terms of effectiveness, it's not even fair.

I watched the BC trial with almost all of you and I agree, he can't hold a candle to Daniels. O/T, but what was the hunky ones name?????????? He was too cute.
 
  • #690
i agree w/ Turnadot - i wanna throw something
 
  • #691
I watched the BC trial with almost all of you and I agree, he can't hold a candle to Daniels. O/T, but what was the hunky ones name?????????? He was too cute.

Det. Jim Young
 
  • #692
Do we know for sure Spivey is the last state's witness?

I am curious about the last search warrant that was issued last Nov.....looking into their financial issues.

What happened to that?

There has to be more.
 
  • #693
I will never predict a jury!!!! lol Boy did i learn my lesson, but im really concerned here! Maybe i will be shocked!!!! :seeya:
 
  • #694
Mama-cita, I hope you are correct!!!
 
  • #695
PY is such an enabler. I bet their finances are interestingly intertwined.
 
  • #696
I watched the BC trial with almost all of you and I agree, he can't hold a candle to Daniels. O/T, but what was the hunky ones name?????????? He was too cute.

Jim Young
 
  • #697
Wow! There are a bunch of Debbie Downers in here! I am going to, for the moment, have faith, and give the jury who is hearing this case for the first time the benefit of the doubt that they will weigh all the EVIDENCE that is being presented. Not the umms, not the dragging out the questions, the evidence. Television has really skewed the way people see the world. People are waiting for the AHA moment because that's what happens in "Law and Order," everything so cut, dry and dramatic!! Even on these stupid medical drama shows, people get false hope because they see some pretend surgeons successfully resect a brain tumor that is fatal 99.9% of the time. But people think that's how it works in real life. It doesn't. At the end of the day these jurors will weigh the evidence. And they will have to decide whether to discount the myriad of LIES this defendant has told, the coincidences that either prove he is a murderer or that he is the unluckiest man in the history of men, and decide his fate because that is our system of law. I am hoping they are diligent about their task and have no choice but to assume they are. Much will depend on the foreperson they elect because the last dude was a staunch NG, and he argued people to vote his way (wasn't it initially 6-6 then they deliberated more and it ended at 8-4?); also the Anthony foreman (I use the word man very loosely there), was a staunch NG that was able to persuade the others.

I truly appreciate your encouragement and wisdom.
I think those of us who watched the first trial were hoping for a better presentation by the prosecution and we didn't get it. Actually, it was worse than the first trial.
I am feeling so very sorry for M and L F right now, as I just can't imagine how they are feeling and what they are thinking. I hope their hope is still alive.
 
  • #698
Here comes the medicine and dropper.

Unidentifed finger print on the medicine cap/dropper just like we talked about last nite!!

( I swear they read here, lol)
 
  • #699
I watched the BC trial with almost all of you and I agree, he can't hold a candle to Daniels. O/T, but what was the hunky ones name?????????? He was too cute.

Detective McDreamy :)
 
  • #700
PY is such an enabler. I bet their finances are interestingly intertwined.

I really think michelle had no idea!!!! No new heat pump!!! :innocent:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
71
Guests online
1,925
Total visitors
1,996

Forum statistics

Threads
632,532
Messages
18,628,012
Members
243,185
Latest member
TheMultiLucy☮️
Back
Top