gracielee
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 4,095
- Reaction score
- 8
Somewhat sleazy, but it doesn't mean his client confessed to him. He saw the evidence and that's how he "knew". He could broker a deal while still trying to point fingers elsewhere, without having his client tell him the truth. He would broker a deal and then submit it to his client: "The state is offering x if you lead them to the body of Danielle. I won't lie to you, this is an intense case and your chances of acquittal are slim. So I want you to think about the offer and then let me know."
But if westerfield then asked for different terms in exchange for the body, then that would be akin to a confession, in my mind. I'll have to ask my law partner how he'd deal with that.
Again, IIRC, and this case was a long time ago now, there was discussion afterwards, after the trial, about bringing Westerfields attorney up on charges due to this conduct. It was such a long time ago, but I was left with the impression the deal had gone further than 'this is what they are offering' stage. That actual negotiations were in progress for the deal. It was cut very close, that deal was about to be made when her body was discovered. At least that's the way I remember it. Do you remember more of the details? I can still picture the face of that







