It's funny to hear questions come from the jury.
Just curious but does any one on here think JY is innocent or is at least not convinced hes guilty? Just curious.
I like it, it gives a look into what concerns them and what they are 'thinking' about in some cases.
Was blood found on the deck boards and the hose? If so, were finger prints found on the hose?
Based on what I knew prior to trial, I believed that Jason was probably guilty. However, during this trial, I am listening for things that refute that assumption. For example, we know that Michelle had a clump of hair in her hand, but we don't yet know where it came from. If it came from a complete unknown, I will definitely adjust my thinking. We also need an explanation for the 2 sets of footprints. I don't think the two cigarette butts or the hair in a photo are meaningful in the trial context.
is it weird that he didnt have any marks on his body if it was a struggle? Wouldn't she of left some kind of mark.
It's funny to hear questions come from the jury.
Based on what I knew prior to trial, I believed that Jason was probably guilty. However, during this trial, I am listening for things that refute that assumption. For example, we know that Michelle had a clump of hair in her hand, but we don't yet know where it came from. If it came from a complete unknown, I will definitely adjust my thinking. We also need an explanation for the 2 sets of footprints. I don't think the two cigarette butts or the hair in a photo are meaningful in the trial context.
Otto, I was out when this question was asked. What was the juror's question, please? TIA.
Based on what I knew prior to trial, I believed that Jason was probably guilty. However, during this trial, I am listening for things that refute that assumption. For example, we know that Michelle had a clump of hair in her hand, but we don't yet know where it came from. If it came from a complete unknown, I will definitely adjust my thinking. We also need an explanation for the 2 sets of footprints. I don't think the two cigarette butts or the hair in a photo are meaningful in the trial context.
From evidence presented, it appears Michelle was in bed asleep when she was attacked from behind. By the time she realized what was happening, she didn't stand a chance. That was his intent.
Surprise attack! of a five month pregnant, sleeping woman.
JMHO
fran
BBM - Before the trial, I read (N&O or WRAL, IIRC) that the injuries on JY's foot (toe bruise, red marks on the sides of his feet which are visible in the pic) were indications of wearing shoes that are too short and too narrow -- some professional made the remarks.
It rang a bell since I sold shoes in my mother's little boutique during H.S., and I saw this once or twice. Some women, especially heavy and larger women, did not buy the correct size. This was back when the first thing we did was offer to measure the feet with gradations for shoe size and width. The foot might measure 9 1/2 B, but the customer would ask for an 8A. We warned about this as to pain, spinal problems and undue wear on the shoe, but they would often insist and cram their foot in it (true story). And we would ring it up. These were nice, expensive shoes, and I remember feeling sorrier for the shoes than for the wearer. :ashamed: FWIW.
OK Here is the DNA evidence expert