JiminWilton
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 152
- Reaction score
- 0
What exactly is the evidence that shows that JY put that rock in the door?
We seem to differ... what has he said that got you off the fence?
Think we'll hear about the size 10 bloody footprints? Will he explain the gasoline consumption argument?
State says no evidence of robbery... what sophistry. Robbery requires one to intimidate and be present before the victim. The missing rings and jewelry box drawers are evidence of burglary.
Labradors do not attack, but they do slobber and love all over you.
What exactly is the evidence that shows that JY put that rock in the door?
He couldn't be excluded when they did the DNA analysis.
I don't think that's significant. How many people couldn't be excluded? Isn't there something like a huge number of the population that can't be excluded from each DNA profile?
He couldn't be excluded when they did the DNA analysis.
One thing to add otto... hotel doors are kind of heavy.
I think the dog argument is an interesting one, and what testimony have we had on that? I mean, I have had a dog that would go CRAZY if one of us came home. He had to let the other know, loud, barking, jumping, howling. But would run and hide if it was someone he didn't know. I've also got a dog that's just the opposite, loud and obnoxious to strangers, and barely lifted his head if he knew it was one of us. Do we know how Mr. G acted?
Cigar lie just went down in flames.
Not excluding does not mean his DNA is there, just means they couldn't exclude him. Kinda like negating each other. But it does allow for use in arguments.
Finding my DNA on any object does not prove anything except that I touched it. It does not prove that I used it to prop open a door or threw it at a dog (barking or otherwise) or anything else. It proves I touched it. That's all.
Further, for LE to have found the exact rock, e pluribus unum, that JY allegedly used to prop open the door and which was either kicked or thrown outside by the night clerk is beyond belief. Might be, but wasn't LabCorp the badguy in the Duke Lacrosse case?