Can you find the granny doll shown? I tried for quite a while and could not.
See the second photo in this post of otto's:
http://websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7614668&postcount=127
Can you find the granny doll shown? I tried for quite a while and could not.
See the second photo in this post of otto's:
http://websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7614668&postcount=127
I don't see a glove.
Silly me. I thought you were referring to the dolls otto had posted with the bangles on its wrist! Yes, those are clearly fingers. I think there is a ring on the third finger, which makes me think he is closing the door by reaching back with his left hand, but that would be an awkward pose to close a door I think.
I think there is a lot of confusion about the part of the 911 where most of us hear "daddy did it" . Some posted they heard "daddy...", which also occured in the 2 minute range of the tape. I would suggest disregarding everything CY says until you get to the 5:01 time of the recording (turn up speakers).
If you still don't hear it, that's ok.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/1119462/
I think there is a lot of confusion about the part of the 911 where most of us hear "daddy did it" . Some posted they heard "daddy...", which also occured in the 2 minute range of the tape. I would suggest disregarding everything CY says until you get to the 5:01 time of the recording (turn up speakers).
If you still don't hear it, that's ok.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/1119462/
JTF mentioned they might not capture any pings if he didn't move and didn't use it, or of course if it was turned off. I think if the DA did not ask about this during the cell phone expert testimony, and neither did the defense, it must be the case there is nothing there to be known.
IMO, if one could possibly think that using that Elton John grandma figure instead of a doctor is an indication by CY that the attacker was a female, then it should be impossible to ignore that she clearly said the word "Daddy" (followed by argument over what she said next) after being asked what happened to mommy.
IMO, the defense can get away with saying grandma doll, but if they go too far with the day care worker talking about other dolls alluding to the grandma doll as being some kind of identifier of the attacker (rather than just CY's having been at the scene) they open the door for the DA to rebut with everything they've got, possibly including recalling MF to discuss more particularly what she heard from CY during the call and playing it again, maybe even playing parts that were deleted.
If I understand the DA has some limits on using CY's statements (and actions) as identifying the attacker (not sure if that's why 911 call has been in some ways limited), and the defense will have to decide if it is worth opening that door from what they have to gain by arguing that the grandma Elton was chosen so as not to represent her dad, who could only have been represented by doctor otherwise.
They will call the doll a female figure, a grandma, etc., and for good reason for their purposes, but getting into comparing other dolls equals identity evidence. The judge might not let them do it either, but I think he'd give them greater leeway than the DA on this, but once the door is open the DA can walk through too.
Interesting point. Could it then open the door to CY's chattering about daddy while in the fire truck with MF?
The fluke was the multiple calls from JLY and even a call from his mother for her to go retrieve the printout. That's just deductive logic. I don't think she would be telling a 911 operator "I came over here to get an eBay printout.". It was more like OMG, I don't normally come here but thank God I did. She was unaware JLY had orchestrated the whole thing...she, unknowingly, was part of his sick script.
I understand that. My point is she was able to testify ABOUT CY talking about daddy but NOT what she actually said.The info about CY mentioning 'daddy' while in the fire truck has already been testified to by MF during re-direct. The defense opened the door to that.
What hasn't been discussed are the utterances made by CY during the 911 call, which many of us can hear twice on the original recording.
Regarding cell phone pinging.. This varies from provider. In 2006 though, it is most likely that the only records obtainable by LE are transmissions that were initiated by an incoming or outgoing call or text.
Based on testimony, I'm pretty confident that LE went off incoming/outgoing calls and texts to "assume" the phone must have been turned off.
Towers do ping cell phones to assist with call/text routing, but that information was usually not stored past 24 hours. I found this call retention chart but it does not show pinging.
http://www.aclu.org/files/pdfs/freespeech/retention_periods_of_major_cellular_service_providers.pdf
A mix of the two drugs in the dropper as well as her (CY's) DNA (which implies her mouth was on said dropper), and a print on a bottle that have come from anywhere. Heck when he was shacking up with Carol Ann she could have had a headache and taken Tylenol. The fact that the dropper itself had NO prints means the person who administered the med wore gloves. I doubt if the person wearing gloves to give it would have been stupid enough to put their prints on the bottle. They were being careful...
I understand that. My point is she was able to testify ABOUT CY talking about daddy but NOT what she actually said.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.