I LOOOOOVE this part:
#7
"The only response the defendant has made toward fulfilling her reciprocal obligation was a Defense Witness List filed November 20, 2008 and an Amended Defense Witness List filed January 22, 2009 due to an improper form of the original."
And then says neither Dr. Kobilinsky or Dr. Lee has been designated an expert witness according to case law.
Ooops!
Mentions the August 21st statement by Todd Macaluso in court that they had evidence that the body was placed there when Casey was in jail.
Great! I, for one, would LOOOOVE to see said evidence.
LOVE this motion! I'm starting to feel better. Was beginning to get bored.
Now, all we need is that fat doc dump (that doesn't seem to be happening). :-(
Says the only thing giving has been the witness lists and revised witness lists. Mentions that it has been over 15 days since the statement.
Seems each side is suppose ti give evidence withen 15 days of having it. I didnt' know that.
Alittle bit off topic but I think Muzikman may apreciate it. While reading all the post a song came to mind that I could see Defense singing as they enter court so gracefully. It is the Peter Gabriel song empahsis on the last two verses. "Sledgehammer" "We'll go dancing in" "I will show for you and you show for me " is a bit of it~ Back to business. ~<3~I think that was an extremely bold move by Mr. TM to state for the record that the defense had proof that the body was placed there while KC was incarcerated. But he said it, now prove it
I LOOOOOVE this part:
#7
"The only response the defendant has made toward fulfilling her reciprocal obligation was a Defense Witness List filed November 20, 2008 and an Amended Defense Witness List filed January 22, 2009 due to an improper form of the original."
And then says neither Dr. Kobilinsky or Dr. Lee has been designated an expert witness according to case law.
Ooops!
I know it shouldn't but reading about the prosecution's request made me chuckle. Mr Baez has been filing motions left and right. It is nice to see that someone else can too. Wonder if Mr Baez will file a counter motion?
:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
Finally! Yes! :crazy: I had a feeling when the defense was screaming out Casey's innocence that this was going to come up. And to add to it, now that they pretty much put a gag in DC's mouth in the ZFG civil case will they now say that Cindy, George, Lee, or DC were the one to move the remains? I have always felt that the last straw for the defense was going to be to throw Cindy under the bus because she is the only other person who they could claim had a motive to kill Caylee and portray to be the so called "Nanny". Remember, the only person who claims they saw Casey and Caylee together before Caylee went missing was George. And we all know how their stories change to their convenience. Casey did claim the last time she saw Caylee was June 9th and it was not found out until later that it was June 15 father's day. Just my theory, I eagerly await what they have up their sleeve.
My first thought on hearing about this motion..............the defense will respond saying, "We're busy trying to make up a story about that right now! As soon as we can come up with something that sounds plausable, we'll provide the prosecution with a copy."
Don't they know there is a shortage of screen writers in Hollywood and it is taking some time to get this one into a final draft? Todd and Larry are on it.
Time for the defense to PUT UP or SHUT UP.![]()
I LOOOOOVE this part:
#7
"The only response the defendant has made toward fulfilling her reciprocal obligation was a Defense Witness List filed November 20, 2008 and an Amended Defense Witness List filed January 22, 2009 due to an improper form of the original."
And then says neither Dr. Kobilinsky or Dr. Lee has been designated an expert witness according to case law.
Ooops!
:read: [Reading motion.] :spit:
Well now! :woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
We shall see if someone has lied to the Court!
:laugh: :liar:
It is one thing to make such representations to the media.
It is altogether another matter to deliberately represent something as pivotal as this to the Court! :nono::nono::nono:
Somebody could be in real troublepossibly contempt? :behindbar
Let's see it, Defense Team ... or are you :chicken: :hen::hen:
Well written motion, Linda. :Crown:
Nice job. :wave:
or the defense can just play the recording of how any information they give at this time will hinder the murder trial as in the zfg case, the check fraud case, etc.