State Wants Evidence From Casey's Defense Team

I think that was an extremely bold move by Mr. TM to state for the record that the defense had proof that the body was placed there while KC was incarcerated. But he said it, now prove it
 
I LOOOOOVE this part:

#7
"The only response the defendant has made toward fulfilling her reciprocal obligation was a Defense Witness List filed November 20, 2008 and an Amended Defense Witness List filed January 22, 2009 due to an improper form of the original."

And then says neither Dr. Kobilinsky or Dr. Lee has been designated an expert witness according to case law.

Ooops!

I laughed out loud when I read both of those parts! Now that she has her little "Dream Team" set up, removing the ineffective assistance of counsel threat I love more and more what a bumbling ding dong JB is!
 
Linda Drane Burdick is my hero-next to Kathi Belich!!:clap:
Fullscreencapture528200941321PMbmp.jpg
 
Mentions the August 21st statement by Todd Macaluso in court that they had evidence that the body was placed there when Casey was in jail.

Great! I, for one, would LOOOOVE to see said evidence. :)

LOVE this motion! I'm starting to feel better. Was beginning to get bored. :)

Now, all we need is that fat doc dump (that doesn't seem to be happening). :-(
 
Great! I, for one, would LOOOOVE to see said evidence. :)

LOVE this motion! I'm starting to feel better. Was beginning to get bored. :)

Now, all we need is that fat doc dump (that doesn't seem to be happening). :-(

Should happen over the next several weeks. :woohoo:
 
Says the only thing giving has been the witness lists and revised witness lists. Mentions that it has been over 15 days since the statement.

Seems each side is suppose ti give evidence withen 15 days of having it. I didnt' know that.

I think that was an extremely bold move by Mr. TM to state for the record that the defense had proof that the body was placed there while KC was incarcerated. But he said it, now prove it
Alittle bit off topic but I think Muzikman may apreciate it. While reading all the post a song came to mind that I could see Defense singing as they enter court so gracefully. It is the Peter Gabriel song empahsis on the last two verses. "Sledgehammer" "We'll go dancing in" "I will show for you and you show for me " is a bit of it~ Back to business. ~<3~
 
I LOOOOOVE this part:

#7
"The only response the defendant has made toward fulfilling her reciprocal obligation was a Defense Witness List filed November 20, 2008 and an Amended Defense Witness List filed January 22, 2009 due to an improper form of the original."

And then says neither Dr. Kobilinsky or Dr. Lee has been designated an expert witness according to case law.

Ooops!

They can't do it, anyway. Kobi is busy doing talk shows, where he contradicts himself on the evidence in different cases. Dr. Lee is taking English classes.
 
I know it shouldn't but reading about the prosecution's request made me chuckle. Mr Baez has been filing motions left and right. It is nice to see that someone else can too. Wonder if Mr Baez will file a counter motion?

He will. Something baseless that will make SS sigh and roll his honorable eyes. ;-)
 
:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:

Finally! Yes! :crazy: I had a feeling when the defense was screaming out Casey's innocence that this was going to come up. And to add to it, now that they pretty much put a gag in DC's mouth in the ZFG civil case will they now say that Cindy, George, Lee, or DC were the one to move the remains? I have always felt that the last straw for the defense was going to be to throw Cindy under the bus because she is the only other person who they could claim had a motive to kill Caylee and portray to be the so called "Nanny". Remember, the only person who claims they saw Casey and Caylee together before Caylee went missing was George. And we all know how their stories change to their convenience. Casey did claim the last time she saw Caylee was June 9th and it was not found out until later that it was June 15 father's day. Just my theory, I eagerly await what they have up their sleeve.

Bette Davis, in "All About Eve"-- "Hold onto your seats, folks. It's gonna be a bumpy night!"
 
My first thought on hearing about this motion..............the defense will respond saying, "We're busy trying to make up a story about that right now! As soon as we can come up with something that sounds plausable, we'll provide the prosecution with a copy."

Don't they know there is a shortage of screen writers in Hollywood and it is taking some time to get this one into a final draft? Todd and Larry are on it.
 
or the defense can just play the recording of how any information they give at this time will hinder the murder trial as in the zfg case, the check fraud case, etc.
 
:read: [Reading motion.] :spit:
Well now! :woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
We shall see if someone has lied to the Court!


:laugh: :liar:

It is one thing to make such representations to the media. :mad:

It is altogether another matter to deliberately represent something as pivotal as this to the Court! :nono::nono::nono:

Somebody could be in real trouble :rolleyes: possibly contempt? :behindbar

Let's see it, Defense Team ... or are you :chicken: :hen::hen:

Well written motion, Linda. :Crown:
Nice job. :wave:
 
Don't they know there is a shortage of screen writers in Hollywood and it is taking some time to get this one into a final draft? Todd and Larry are on it.

They're gonna need George Lucas and his special effects team too!!:crazy:
 

Thank You Spangle

If have this overwhelming feeling of elation at the moment.
Nice move State Attorney's :clap:

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...k-casey-anthony-evidence-091009,0,57591.story
snipped
"According to a state motion filed Thursday, defense attorney Todd Macaluso told the court on Aug. 21: "There's substantial evidence, that we've discovered . . . that the body or the remains of Caylee Anthony were placed there after Casey Anthony was locked up in the Orange County Correctional facility."

The state is asking a judge compel the defense to provide names, addresses and all supporting documentation relative to their claim
Prosecutors argue Anthony's defense team has reciprocal discovery obligations. The only response Anthony has made toward fulfilling her obligation was defense witness lists.

"The only conclusion this Court can draw from the fact that no additional reciprocal discovery exhibit has been filed is (1) the exculpatory evidence does not exist, or (2) the defendant is intentionally violating the rules of discovery," the motion said."


I particularly enjoyed reading the above. :)
 
I LOOOOOVE this part:

#7
"The only response the defendant has made toward fulfilling her reciprocal obligation was a Defense Witness List filed November 20, 2008 and an Amended Defense Witness List filed January 22, 2009 due to an improper form of the original."

And then says neither Dr. Kobilinsky or Dr. Lee has been designated an expert witness according to case law.

Ooops!

for the part in bold red :floorlaugh:
 
:read: [Reading motion.] :spit:
Well now! :woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
We shall see if someone has lied to the Court!


:laugh: :liar:

It is one thing to make such representations to the media. :mad:

It is altogether another matter to deliberately represent something as pivotal as this to the Court! :nono::nono::nono:

Somebody could be in real trouble :rolleyes: possibly contempt? :behindbar

Let's see it, Defense Team ... or are you :chicken: :hen::hen:

Well written motion, Linda. :Crown:
Nice job. :wave:

Really? By making the bold statement about "Substantial Evidence" Macaluso? - or the team? could face sanctions? :doh:
 
or the defense can just play the recording of how any information they give at this time will hinder the murder trial as in the zfg case, the check fraud case, etc.

I know! It's as someone posted the other day - there are so many other cases that have come and gone in much less time with much less evidence...why is this case seemingly so different? I'm waiting for the defense to refuse to provide discovery because it might convict Casey lol. I don't understand it at all. I love Judge Strickland, but what's with the delays and the bending over backwards for teaching schedules and unprofessionalism?
 
Well, it's about darn time! I am soooo glad that the SA finally decided to put JB and Co. to the task of proving what they say! JB has been spouting from the beginning that they were going to tell this story that would make us all understand but he could only tell it in court at trial, which I STILL don't understand! Bring it, JB! Let's see this magical proof of innocence!
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
247
Guests online
513
Total visitors
760

Forum statistics

Threads
625,770
Messages
18,509,611
Members
240,842
Latest member
womanofsteel69
Back
Top