- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,552
- Reaction score
- 71,618
Wow, the hacking case just got a lot more interesting! They're saying that Harry is suing for Diana's phone being hacked in the 90's among other things and if its able to be proven that evidence was destroyed the historic nature of the claims will be allowed.
WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry Set to Claim Princess Diana was Hacked by The Sun AND The Mirror - which then 'Covered Up' — Byline Investigates
Prince Harry: tabloids hid hacking crimes for 20 years
"Legal experts have suggested the duke would have a problem bringing the claim. Under the Limitation Act, there is a six-year window from when a claimant becomes aware of the privacy breach to bring a claim."
"However, it is clear that the duke’s claim extends at least a decade beyond that 2007 case. As with the other group claims, the duke alleges evidence was destroyed and concealed and so any limitation defence would fail under Section 32 of the Act if it were shown to have concealed wrongdoing."
"“This is far more serious than just phone-hacking because these allegations involve perverting the course of justice, perjury and fraud against senior executives and senior editors,” a source familiar with the claim explained. This would shift the focus away from the actions of individual journalists to the higher echelons of the newspaper organisations."
"In 2015, the Crown Prosecution Service said there was “no evidence” NGN had deleted emails to pervert the course of justice. Both News UK and Reach UK, owner of the Mirror, declined to comment."
I cannot see this claim being successful if it is going back to the late 1990s they are wasting money on legal fees.