momrids6
JUSTICE FOR JENNIFER
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2012
- Messages
- 8,110
- Reaction score
- 11,356
Unethical and kind of reeks of entitlement really. Can’t have everything. And security should not be paid for by the taxpayers either, imo.
There are a lot more pictures and video on the DM. It looks like paps hiding behind a car!
Meghan beams carrying Archie and walking her dogs as Harry boards a flight to Vancouver | Daily Mail Online
I love watching Royal weddings. I think Bea will make a beautiful bride. Both her mother and sister chose beautiful dresses for their weddings, and I think Bea will choose something elegant and beautiful.
Good catch! Well how on earth would they know the exact tree to be in? Her guards are not concerned. One was on his phone, that I could see on Inside Edition.There are a lot more pictures and video on the DM. It looks like paps hiding behind a car!
Meghan beams carrying Archie and walking her dogs as Harry boards a flight to Vancouver | Daily Mail Online
There are a lot more pictures and video on the DM. It looks like paps hiding behind a car!
Meghan beams carrying Archie and walking her dogs as Harry boards a flight to Vancouver | Daily Mail Online
Unethical and kind of reeks of entitlement really. Can’t have everything. And security should not be paid for by the taxpayers either, imo.
He looks like he is sliding sideways with his face smushed into her chest... I have never used one of these carriers, is it even done up properly?
They were not as grainy on Inside Edition. Idk why.....The photos look like ones I take through a window...maybe the photographer was in a car and took the photos from behind the window? Though I'm not sure why they wouldn't wind the window down? But in my opinion the quality of the photos definitely suggests it's been taken through a window....and if they were hiding behind a car, they might have taken them through both windows of the car (on each side) because they're very grainy with what I consider a window effect.
Okay, not a tree, but that was a bit tongue in cheek to say that they have been known to hide in all sorts of places to get 'the' shot. It's what a photographer does, whether they're taking papparazzi shots or wildlife shots.
Good catch! Well how on earth would they know the exact tree to be in? Her guards are not concerned. One was on his phone, that I could see on Inside Edition.
after watching it again, I’m still clueless. I guess hiding behind a car makes more sense. MM did not walk to the trail, imo. I believe it is a couple mi from her rental house. So maybe a car followed her security team as they drove?
Hopefully a professional photographer will do an expose' on how they think this whole thing went down. I'm super curious.
When they registered the name originally they were still fully *in* the Royal family, and according to their statement of intentions they were hoping to find a kind of part-time Royals compromise.
He looks like he is sliding sideways with his face smushed into her chest... I have never used one of these carriers, is it even done up properly?
I understand. But that is now no longer the case. To be fully financially independent means the should not benefit at all from it. They’re already making $ on the whole story. They’re not young: they should be very grateful Charles is giving them money as well. Acting pays well
Oooooo if you really want to feel old, ran into this via a link posted up thread
The Best Paparazzi Moments from the '90s
There is at least one pic of Princess Di, so it’s on topic
those were the days....
ETA. My late 20s yr old daughter LOVES the American Eagle mom jean style. Lmao. Who ever thought those would need to make a comeback