Linda7NJ said:
WHEW! I am relieved ! So what's the deal with the photographs? Were employees made aware ahead of time that the FEDS would be coming?
Well, the fact that it passed inspection apparently doesn't mean much, according to a person on amm-j. Here's her comment:
"Basically, if the animals are not caked in filth, have minimal
substandard food and water on the day they are inspected, meet the
minimal habitat requirements set up by USDA and there is reasonable
evidence of previous/recent vet treatment for any visibly sick
animals, then a licensed zoo would pass inspection. Two days would be
enough time to hose the animals and cages down and slop some food out
for the critters. It would NOT prove any other mistreatment of the
animals."
She points out that while small circuses and old zoos pass inspection, oftentimes public opinion is that their animals are not humanely housed and cared for. She has a point - I recall the time one of my sisters reported a traveling petting zoo and the authorities wouldn't do anything about it, even though she'd reported the animals were out in high-ninety-degree (F.) temps with no shade and no water all day. And for years our local city zoo had positively deplorable conditions for most of its animals, but they always passed inspection. Dark, small, and dirty housing apparently wasn't enough to get them into trouble with the Feds.
So, federal requirements are fairly minimal, and as long as those minimums were met, Neverland's zoo passed inspection. A month ago.