I apologize that you were greatly offended by my asking if you were typing on a device that did not allow you to complete your sentences or use punctuation, I did say that I meant no offense by it. And in answer to your WT -beep question, I was asking because I have never personally seen an educator who does not insist on themselves (and other people) using sentence structure, correct language or grammar consistently, they always have the most proper use of the language as possible, from what I have seen. Which made me wonder if perhaps you were posting from some mobile site like twitter, where you can only use 140 characters at a time and must therefore conserve on your punctuation, and that perhaps the host was adding the "..." in between your incomplete sentences for continuity. Again, my apologies, I have since tried to concentrate on the content of your ideas while disregarding your unique style.
Please post the link where it is suggested that there are laws requiring farms in southern Ontario to have incinerators. To clarify, my proposition that the incinerator may have been bought to possibly comply with safe disposal of wildlife laws was based not on livestock and birds falling from the sky, as my words have been twisted to, but as the article I posted with it stated, many birds and even wild animals such as deer are in collisions with aircraft worldwide on a consistent basis. Just as there are raccoons and skunks by the roadside that have been hit by cars and trucks moving at great speeds on the roads, there are also animals and especially fowl that get hit by airplanes. I believe the article also stated that when planes hit birds, often the planes are going fast enough for the fowl to penetrate the plane. I believe that wildlife collisions were sited as a common reason for airplane repair (as in the R in MRO), because unlike hitting a skunk where your car wouldn't really sustain any damage, planes hitting anything at these speeds sustain damage, often major and sometimes fatal (think of the plane that landed in the Hudson River recently, and how captain Sully is considered a hero for saving all the people abroad after they hit a some birds). The article states that airports nears fields, marshes, or water (such as the water where a body was found on the weekend) attract more wildlife. My supposition based on that information was to wonder if perhaps in running an MRO, a means of disposing of animal and fowl remains hygienically is a necessary part of maintaining health and safety standards.
illowfight2:
