OriginalJerseyGirl
CERTIFIED FLYERS FANATIC!
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2005
- Messages
- 7,203
- Reaction score
- 23
I read this to mean that the landlord had let them live for free for the two months prior to this interview. That would have been either February & March or March & April, depending on whether or not he was including April as one of the "last two months". ETA: The word "last" wouldn't make sense in the sentence otherwise. It would have made sense to say that he gave them free rent for the FIRST two months after they lost their jobs if they meant that it was immediately following the job loss. So I think it means that he gave them free rent for the two months prior to this interview BECAUSE they lost their jobs. I think "after" was just a poor word choice in the article. They should have either said "the past two months" or used the word because rather than after.lauriej said:http://www.wral.com/news/4431154/detail.html
WRAL has learned Abaroa and her husband, Raven, had been going through money problems recently. Their landlord let them live rent-free for the last two months after they lost their jobs. The landlord said they had found new jobs and were getting back on their feet.
..........
............it looks like it..........2 months free rent for 2 months after leaving eurosport....the church kicked in for a month before or after that.....
Could I have made this any more confusing? LOL.
