The oversized Bloomingdale’s panties.

[Agatha_C]

otg,

So Patsy's lies are being used to suggest RDI posters might be hallucinating, or smoking non-tobacco products?

Regardless of what Patsy purchased nothing was found to match her description.

Had it been found then 13 pairs of identically sized Bloomingdales might have been discovered or 7 pairs of size-6's and 6-pairs of size-12 Bloomingdales.

Neither combination was found despite a house search, so either Patsy lied or the intruder stole the underwear?

But no it was not the intruder who stole the underwear because Patsy knew she had been caught out lying so decided to magic up some size-12's and claim Hey we just found these, you guys must have missed them, first time around

The issue as Patsy diagnosed it is: non-existence of underwear, not their size.

Now where are my non-tobacco products?


.

LOL.... I dont knnow about non tabacco products, but give Niquil a try.... :woohoo:

 

[Agatha_C]

Yes..it "MUST" be a lie...NOT!!!

The Gigantic (Girls Size 12-14) "Bloomies" Underwear Found On JonBenet - Page 17 - Forums For Justice

Post #197...picture of 12/14 label inside of "Bloomies" panties...and of tag with size 12/14...and the purchase price. Thank you so much KoldKase!!!!!

So YES..size 12/14 Bloomingdale's panties (aka Bloomies) do exist. I have heard that they are hard to get now, though. Okay...how much more proof do you need. Patsy admitted to buying 12/14 "Bloomie" panties for Jenny.....she later said that she decided NOT to give them to Jenny, so she put them in JB's drawer, for her to use if she wanted. JB's body was found wearing a pair of 12/14 "Bloomies"....The Ramsey's turned over the remaining pack of size 12/14 Bloomies...about two years later. And now..I show you a picture of size 12/14 in the label and tag of a pair of "Bloomies". Yes Virginia...size 12/14 "Bloomies" DO exist.

And thats how its done... You freaking rule!!!!!!!! :great:

 

[Ames]

Yeah, wonderfully informative and really had me ROFLMAO sooooo hilarious.



Hmm, that's what I was doing, as I was so sick of hearing this unsubstantiated claim about the size 12/14 panties, supposedly so big they were falling off her, that not one person who saw her wearing them noticed or remarked on.



Not one scrap of proof did you provide. It was even established (and not refuted by you or anyone else) that size 12/14 doesn't exist in Bloomingdales panties.


Doesn't that make you wonder about the accuracy of the BPD's statement alone? That poor child didn't own a single pair of panties in her own size? You seem happy to accept PRs word about purchasing panties for her niece, but at the same time she bought at least one packet of 7 pairs for JBR, but you haven't noticed that they weren't found by BPD either. Did they look with their eyes closed?




Really, where have you substantiated that she was found in size 12/14 panties that were falling off her? I presented the Bloomingdales size chart that clearly shows no size 12/14 exists and that size 12 is designed for a 9-10 year old. The opposing view is only that the underwear sizes differ (without providing any proof) and that Bloomingdales have changed their sizes (again without providing proof). The fact that the interviewer said they were designed for a child weighing 85lbs shows the panties were in fact the size 12 on the chart that I provided. By RDI believing they have Victory! in the panty size war, just goes to show they do not believe any evidence when it is presented, if it disagrees with their own theory.



Misinformation by RDI is what their case is based on. This has been going on for years and will no doubt continue.



Yes, I am bored as well, but if you want to gloat you have cleared this up to everyone's satsifaction, you are only satisfying yourself and other RDI. As far as I am concerned there were no size 12/14 panties, because you have not demonstrated that Bloomingdales day of the week panties came in that size.

If you want to cease discussing the panty size issue, then you will have to stop claiming a win for your side, when all you did was wear me down with the boredom and triteness of your arguments.

Patsy admitted to buying size 12/14 "Bloomies" for a relative, Jenny...OH MY GOSH...are YOU calling PATSY a liar??? Certainly you aren't.....

 

[Ames]

This brand is St Eve. Bloomingdales do/did sell other brands of panties as well. What has this to do with the Bloomies panties??

Bloomies are panties bought from Bloomingdales...not a brand name. The Word Bloomies are on the OUTSide of the package, and on the back of the panties...the Wednesday size 12/14 "Bloomies" are the exact same ones that are in this pack, that Jayelles herself bought....she bought 4/6 and 12/14...

[ame="http://www.forumsforjustice.org/forums/showthread.php?t=7107"]The Gigantic (Girls Size 12-14) "Bloomies" Underwear Found On JonBenet - Forums For Justice[/ame]

Post #1...picture of Wednesday size 12/14 Bloomies...inside of package, it's the first one on the left that you can see. Pink, purple, blue flowers...

I am done discussing this with you...you are trying to muddy the waters...and sidetrack us from evidence that show that the Ramseys murdered their daughter. We all know what you are up to, and I am done...no more Panty sources for you.

 

[MurriFlower]

murry the chart you keep referring to is for clothes not panties.bloomingdale's is not selling any girl panties on their website right now so there is no chart for that.there is no girl size 16 and there never has been.

Ok, well here's a current Macys girls underwear size chart.

Notice the similarity to the Bloomingdales?

 

[Ames]

Ok, well here's a current Macys girls underwear size chart.

Notice the similarity to the Bloomingdales?

According to this chart...even though it's from Macy's....JB was 6...she would have worn a size 7....(small)...not a size 12/14....(Large).

 

[MurriFlower]

According to this chart...even though it's from Macy's....JB was 6...she would have worn a size 7....(small)...not a size 12/14....(Large).

What we are talking about is size 12 designed for a 9-10 year old. The same as the Bloomingdales size chart.

 

[claudicici]

That is also a clothes not an underwear chart.

 

[Ames]

What we are talking about is size 12 designed for a 9-10 year old. The same as the Bloomingdales size chart.

Oh okay...I was looking at the chart, and I do not see where it says Underwear Chart...can you provide the link to it please??

 

[Ames]

That is also a clothes not an underwear chart.

Uh huh...that's what I thought!!

 

[claudicici]

here's a current underwear chart :
http://www.kidbean.com/sizecharts.html#kidbeanunderwear
KidBean
(underwear)
Size Height Weight
2T/3T 34-37 in. 26-30 lbs.
4T/5T 40-42 in. 34-39 lbs.
6T/6X 44-47 in. 44-50 lbs.
8 50 in. 55 lbs.
These are made to accommodate the higher shrinkage inherent to minimally-processed organic cotton and sized generously to allow your child to wear them at least thru the end of the size range. For example, if your child is of average HEIGHT, he will fit in the 2T/3T size until he is almost 4 years old.

 

[otg]

Hey guys I'm really out of the loop on the JB case and try as I might I can't figure out what the big pantie thing means.Anyone care to draw me a picture? 8~)

billiejo,

If you start [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124291"]here[/ame], you'll get the picture -- literally -- all of them, thanks to cynic. And then if you read the next ten pages, you'll have caught up. But please don't ask anyone here for a synopsis. (And when you get here, you'll understand why I say that.)
.

 

[Agatha_C]

billiejo,

If you start here, you'll get the picture -- literally -- all of them, thanks to cynic. And then if you read the next ten pages, you'll have caught up. But please don't ask anyone here for a synopsis. (And when you get here, you'll understand why I say that.)
.

Oh brother, you can say that again.... :thud:

 

[MurriFlower]

That is also a clothes not an underwear chart.

http://www1.macys.com/catalog/product/index.ognc?ID=445216&PseudoCat=se-xx-xx-xx.esn_results

click on size chart

 

[MurriFlower]

Oh okay...I was looking at the chart, and I do not see where it says Underwear Chart...can you provide the link to it please??

http://www1.macys.com/catalog/product/index.ognc?ID=445216&PseudoCat=se-xx-xx-xx.esn_results

click on size chart

 

[MurriFlower]

http://www1.macys.com/catalog/product/index.ognc?ID=445216&PseudoCat=se-xx-xx-xx.esn_results

click on size chart

here's some more

http://www.crazy8.com/shop/dept_ite...older_id=2534374302775217&bmUID=1292856013402

http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/juicy-c...ory&siteId=J84DHJLQkR4-cCDLsK0xJpQYdVB7f1vkFA

again, click on the size chart. You will notice all these are for underwear.

 

[UKGuy]

Patsy says a lot of things in her interviews, most of it is NOT TRUE ! !

celticthyme,

You like many others on this thread seem to have become lost in the rhetoric of size.

It is the non-existence of the size-12 Bloomingdales anywhere in the house, despite Patsy saying she purchased them, that she placed them into JonBenet's underwear drawer. Hence the reason why JonBenet was discovered at a crime-scene wearing size-12 Bloomingdale underwear and not her normal size-6. e.g. JonBenet dressed herself in the size-12's

So if you reckon what Patsy is saying here is not true then why does she feel the need to lie?

If she is telling the truth, where are the Bloomingdale size-12's and/or size-6s?


.

 

[UKGuy]

The Ramseys were said to have been mostly packed for their trip to see the grown kids and then a Disney cruise. Some bags were already on the plane. All panties mentioned as taken for evidence are said to have come from the panty drawer, 15 of them. There must have been quite a few panties already packed for the trip. Were the bags ever checked? I'm not a troll and don't care what anyone says. I know that fifteen years ago some panties could be found in single sizes and know that JonBenet could have been in a single size 8 especially if the size 6 panties were ever washed in warm water and dried they will shrink some. Size 8/10 probably would be too big for her just like the 12/14, but size 8 would be okay. There are even today some girls brands of panties that can be bought in single sizes. Maybe not Bloomingdale's but they're out there and were back then, too.

txsvicki,

Everything you say is fine and dandy. There may or may not be underwear matching your description in bags located in a plane, which have not been checked?

This does not alter Patsy's position. No underwear matching the description of that purchased by Patsy at Bloomingdales for her niece Jenny and/or JonBenet were found anywhere in the house.

This size is not the issue, the size only flags up the issue, its the non-existence thats the issue.


.

 

[UKGuy]

Hey guys I'm really out of the loop on the JB case and try as I might I can't figure out what the big pantie thing means.Anyone care to draw me a picture? 8~)

billiejo,

Its simple, but those that have no evidence for their own claims e.g. IDI seek to talk nonsense about a rival claim e.g. RDI. They seem to sleep better at night behaving this way.

Patsy stated to BPD interviewers that she purchased underwear from Bloomingdales on a trip to New York . No underwear matching the description of that purchased by Patsy at Bloomingdales for her niece, 12-year old, Jenny and/or JonBenet were found anywhere in the house.

This size is not the issue, the size only flags up the issue, its the non-existence of the underwear thats the issue.


.

 

[SunnieRN]

First of all this is not, never has been, or ever will be a contest. There is no victory, no matter what, no matter who killed JonBenet. This is about a little girl. A girl who went to bed, with her family there and was brutally murdered on Christmas night. A girl that was in a place that was supposed to be safe, that was surrounded by people who loved her.

This is also about who killed her. The motivation and reason behind the murder. It is also about staging and what was meant to be accomplished.

The most important thing is and will always be JonBenet. This isn't a game, there can be no victory. This was a murder.

We are all here to establish facts. Facts that support our beliefs. That's the way it works. That means FACTS need to be presented! Opinions are like butt cheeks, everyone has them.

The two posts here are fantastic examples of facts, ladies you rock.

Otg and Agatha, I love humor, it is awesome, but I must say UKGuy is right there with you. I am loving his troll post, as it has been ages since I thought about or dealt with trolls. Thanks everyone! You all rock it!

claudicici,

Yes with IDI talking patent nonsense what else can you do but laugh. :great:

p.s. You should just leave IDI to rant since they are posting nonsense aimed at getting a response. Once upon a time it was called trolling and the persons responsible trolls, the standard response was dont feed the trolls!

Instead have a laugh :great: :great: :great: :great: :great:
.

Bloomies are panties bought from Bloomingdales...not a brand name. The Word Bloomies are on the OUTSide of the package, and on the back of the panties...the Wednesday size 12/14 "Bloomies" are the exact same ones that are in this pack, that Jayelles herself bought....she bought 4/6 and 12/14...

The Gigantic (Girls Size 12-14) "Bloomies" Underwear Found On JonBenet - Forums For Justice

Post #1...picture of Wednesday size 12/14 Bloomies...inside of package, it's the first one on the left that you can see. Pink, purple, blue flowers...

I am done discussing this with you...you are trying to muddy the waters...and sidetrack us from evidence that show that the Ramseys murdered their daughter. We all know what you are up to, and I am done...no more Panty sources for you.