The oversized Bloomingdale’s panties.

[Toltec]

Yesiree, will clean out my 5yo's panty drawer and buy her MUDFLAPS underwear!

Agatha, you might as well patent these new MUDFLAP undies!

 

[Agatha_C]

Sorry it's kinda sloppy and not very artistic (best I could do from work in a hurry).

Preeeeeeeeeeesenting...

Agatha_C's Mud Flap Baby:

.

Thats exactly how I pictured it....LOL....

 

[Agatha_C]

Yesiree, will clean out my 5yo's panty drawer and buy her MUDFLAPS underwear!

Agatha, you might as well patent these new MUDFLAP undies!

Y'all are killing me... I can barely breath and you're making me laugh, it isnt pretty to see or hear...

Agatha>>>>> :curtsey:

 

[otg]

I should point out the following:

• No children were harmed in the production of the preceding image.
• Resemblance to any person, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
• Any suggestion of an intentional double entendre is just plain wrong and will be vehemently denied by the producer.

:angel:
​

.

 

[my_tee_mouse]

Y'all are killing me... I can barely breath and you're making me laugh, it isnt pretty to see or hear...

Agatha>>>>> :curtsey:

I know the feeling. I'm gonna need some of them thar mudflap underwear to replace my own in a minute.:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::crazy:

 

[otg]

I know the feeling. I'm gonna need some of them thar mudflap underwear to replace my own in a minute.:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::crazy:

Okay, who put the silly pill in our water today? We can't seem to shake it. What's wrong with us.
.

 

[claudicici]

We needed relief from that ridiculous size discussion.It was indeed becoming comical.

 

[SunnieRN]

A lot of you have made a lot of great posts here. I thank you for that. Agathas' mud flaps, with otgs' visual were hilarious!

There comes a time, when you believe in something, that you decide to take a stand. My stand was in not allowing a muddying of the waters, yet again. There was a lot of proof given to support that the size 12/14 undies existed, that JonBenet wore size 6 undies and that 4 and 6's were found in her drawer.

Fifteen pairs of undies were found. None of the undies that Patsy stated she put in the drawer were there. There were no size 8 and no size 12/14. These 6 pair of size 12/14's were instead turned in, over 2 years later, by the R's, through their law team.

All of this is substantiated and was here, for everyone to view. By allowing statements, to go unchallenged, that have been proven to be incorrect, is muddying the waters and making it harder to keep the facts straight.

We are discussing and arguing ideas that have been discussed and argued for many years. Should we allow misinformation to continue to be accepted? Or should the points that can be proven as fact, become just that, fact?

Maybe I bored everyone, or even made the conversation comical, but, I also established the difference between a fact and an opinion, I hope. To me, this was very important.

 

[UKGuy]

A lot of you have made a lot of great posts here. I thank you for that. Agathas' mud flaps, with otgs' visual were hilarious!

There comes a time, when you believe in something, that you decide to take a stand. My stand was in not allowing a muddying of the waters, yet again. There was a lot of proof given to support that the size 12/14 undies existed, that JonBenet wore size 6 undies and that 4 and 6's were found in her drawer.

Fifteen pairs of undies were found. None of the undies that Patsy stated she put in the drawer were there. There were no size 8 and no size 12/14. These 6 pair of size 12/14's were instead turned in, over 2 years later, by the R's, through their law team.

All of this is substantiated and was here, for everyone to view. By allowing statements, to go unchallenged, that have been proven to be incorrect, is muddying the waters and making it harder to keep the facts straight.

We are discussing and arguing ideas that have been discussed and argued for many years. Should we allow misinformation to continue to be accepted? Or should the points that can be proven as fact, become just that, fact?

Maybe I bored everyone, or even made the conversation comical, but, I also established the difference between a fact and an opinion, I hope. To me, this was very important.

SunnieRN,

ITA. Allow the IDI their fanciful speculations. But its not their role to revise or construct RDI theories.

The constant questioning by the IDI and the demand for evidence, whilst supplying no further IDI evidence, is contrary to helpful discussion. Since by definition any IDI will hold opposing views.

I am moving towards ignoring IDI who promote self evident nonsense on the grounds they might be in the pay of the Ramsey's or their associates?



.

 

[KariKae]

I don't know if we have brought this up yet or not....

If JBR was really soiling herself (i.e. pooping her pants), Patsy probably threw a lot of panties away. PR doesn't seem like the type to scrub them clean. She would most like throw them away and buy new.

So, the undies in her drawer were most likely the correct size.

 

[UKGuy]

I don't know if we have brought this up yet or not....

If JBR was really soiling herself (i.e. pooping her pants), Patsy probably threw a lot of panties away. PR doesn't seem like the type to scrub them clean. She would most like throw them away and buy new.

So, the undies in her drawer were most likely the correct size.

KariKae,

They were the correct size, Patsy says so in her interview!


.

 

[MurriFlower]

I don't know if we have brought this up yet or not....

If JBR was really soiling herself (i.e. pooping her pants), Patsy probably threw a lot of panties away. PR doesn't seem like the type to scrub them clean. She would most like throw them away and buy new.

So, the undies in her drawer were most likely the correct size.

my bold

No, I think if we are to believe the BPD and RDI, JBR did not own a single pair of panties in the correct size. Does that sound likely?

Quote cynic: Despite the fact that only size 4-6 panties were found in JBR’s panty drawer, PR claimed that JBR normally would wear size 8-10.

 

[claudicici]

omg murry,so the bpd LIED to Patsy about the size panties they collected for evidence?
....and you still maintain that Patsy did not lie about Jon Benet wearing size 8 discounting all of us here that live in this country telling you over and over again that an average 6 year old wears size 6 panties ,JonBenet was not an oversized little girl.
That's what I meant with the discussion was getting comical ,not at all anything you said Sunnie....

 

[claudicici]

my bold

No, I think if we are to believe the BPD and RDI, JBR did not own a single pair of panties in the correct size. Does that sound likely?

Quote cynic: Despite the fact that only size 4-6 panties were found in JBR’s panty drawer, PR claimed that JBR normally would wear size 8-10.

you also need to rephrase that Murry,if we were to believe PATSY JonBenet did not own a single pair of panties in the correct size.

 

[SunnieRN]

I can not imagine that if Patsy KNEW JonBenet needed size 8 underwear, that she wouldn't have bought it. It's not as if undies are expensive in comparison to pageant dresses, or regular clothing. Facts are, that JonBenet was a petite little thing. You can see that her clothing was always well fitting. Why in heavens name would Patsy make her wear undies that were too small? That makes absolutely no sense. This seems to me to be a distancing statement, along with the statement that she put the panties intended for Jenny in JonBenets drawer.

IMHO, distancing = lying in this case.

 

[UKGuy]

omg murry,so the bpd LIED to Patsy about the size panties they collected for evidence?
....and you still maintain that Patsy did not lie about Jon Benet wearing size 8 discounting all of us here that live in this country telling you over and over again that an average 6 year old wears size 6 panties ,JonBenet was not an oversized little girl.
That's what I meant with the discussion was getting comical ,not at all anything you said Sunnie....

claudicici,

Yes with IDI talking patent nonsense what else can you do but laugh. :great:

p.s. You should just leave IDI to rant since they are posting nonsense aimed at getting a response. Once upon a time it was called trolling and the persons responsible trolls, the standard response was dont feed the trolls!

Instead have a laugh :great: :great: :great: :great: :great:
.

 

[MurriFlower]

A lot of you have made a lot of great posts here. I thank you for that. Agathas' mud flaps, with otgs' visual were hilarious!

Yeah, wonderfully informative and really had me ROFLMAO sooooo hilarious.

There comes a time, when you believe in something, that you decide to take a stand. My stand was in not allowing a muddying of the waters, yet again.

Hmm, that's what I was doing, as I was so sick of hearing this unsubstantiated claim about the size 12/14 panties, supposedly so big they were falling off her, that not one person who saw her wearing them noticed or remarked on.

There was a lot of proof given to support that the size 12/14 undies existed, that JonBenet wore size 6 undies and that 4 and 6's were found in her drawer.

Not one scrap of proof did you provide. It was even established (and not refuted by you or anyone else) that size 12/14 doesn't exist in Bloomingdales panties.

Fifteen pairs of undies were found. None of the undies that Patsy stated she put in the drawer were there. There were no size 8 and no size 12/14. These 6 pair of size 12/14's were instead turned in, over 2 years later, by the R's, through their law team.

Doesn't that make you wonder about the accuracy of the BPD's statement alone? That poor child didn't own a single pair of panties in her own size? You seem happy to accept PRs word about purchasing panties for her niece, but at the same time she bought at least one packet of 7 pairs for JBR, but you haven't noticed that they weren't found by BPD either. Did they look with their eyes closed?

All of this is substantiated and was here, for everyone to view. By allowing statements, to go unchallenged, that have been proven to be incorrect, is muddying the waters and making it harder to keep the facts straight.

Really, where have you substantiated that she was found in size 12/14 panties that were falling off her? I presented the Bloomingdales size chart that clearly shows no size 12/14 exists and that size 12 is designed for a 9-10 year old. The opposing view is only that the underwear sizes differ (without providing any proof) and that Bloomingdales have changed their sizes (again without providing proof). The fact that the interviewer said they were designed for a child weighing 85lbs shows the panties were in fact the size 12 on the chart that I provided. By RDI believing they have Victory! in the panty size war, just goes to show they do not believe any evidence when it is presented, if it disagrees with their own theory.

We are discussing and arguing ideas that have been discussed and argued for many years. Should we allow misinformation to continue to be accepted? Or should the points that can be proven as fact, become just that, fact?

Misinformation by RDI is what their case is based on. This has been going on for years and will no doubt continue.

Maybe I bored everyone, or even made the conversation comical, but, I also established the difference between a fact and an opinion, I hope. To me, this was very important.

Yes, I am bored as well, but if you want to gloat you have cleared this up to everyone's satsifaction, you are only satisfying yourself and other RDI. As far as I am concerned there were no size 12/14 panties, because you have not demonstrated that Bloomingdales day of the week panties came in that size.

If you want to cease discussing the panty size issue, then you will have to stop claiming a win for your side, when all you did was wear me down with the boredom and triteness of your arguments.

 

[MurriFlower]

you also need to rephrase that Murry,if we were to believe PATSY JonBenet did not own a single pair of panties in the correct size.

claudi, PR stated she bought Bloomies for JBR at the same time. Where were they?

 

[SunnieRN]

MF, your post does not deserve a response that is in any way civil. You just called every one who posted a link here a liar. You obviously did not research the links or give us an inner wear or size chart from when Bloomingdales sold bloomies.

UK Guy, I am beginning to believe you have the right idea.

 

[MurriFlower]

MF, your post does not deserve a response that is in any way civil. You just called every one who posted a link here a liar. You obviously did not research the links or give us an inner wear or size chart from when Bloomingdales sold bloomies.

UK Guy, I am beginning to believe you have the right idea.

Oh good, can we stop talking about it now, or do you want to claim a victory again??