The Rest of the Story...

Doesn't CPS interfere with parents all the time in that state and all the others? What is the judge going to do to change that?

CPS has a lot of power and very little oversight from what I can see. Not to say that most of the children removed by CPS every day in this country should not be taken from abusive parents...but isn't that interference with parents?

Hi SewingDeb,

Youre right, the judge cant control what happens all over the state. But as a District Court Judge she can control what goes on in Bexar County. Unfortunately for CPS, in all their wisdom, this is where they sent the child. That gave this Judge jurisdiction. I guess the restraining order means that they are released from the vaguely put together "family Plan" and the "visits" by CPS? Does anyone know if that is what the restraining order means?
 
http://www.truthwillprevail.org/index.php?parentid=1&index=64


Letters to the Governor
By Donald Richter



On June 6, 2008, under freedom of information laws, we obtained from the governor’s office a collection of over 3,000 pages of documents, mostly e-mail correspondence, pertaining to the raid on the YFZ community in April. We shared this collection with the Salt Lake Tribune, and on June 10, reporter Brooke Adams published an article making a preliminary analysis of some of the material. We are still in the process of studying this collection but feel to share with our readers several excerpts from letters written to the governor after the raid.
The majority of these letters were e-mails to the governor’s office, although many were conventional typewritten letters, and some were handwritten. Almost all of them include complete names and addresses. To date we have reviewed about 600 of these letters. The total number available is uncertain at this time since many letters are interspersed with other communications. There would appear to be at least 1,000 letters in all, possibly more.
The earlier version of the Tribune article reported 449 letters opposed to the removal of the children and 32 in favor. This ratio is fairly consistent for those letters we have examined. These numbers have been removed from the updated version of the article, possibly because further examination of the collection showed a total number of letters greater than 481.
We are grateful for the many fair-minded and thoughtful citizens throughout the nation who feel strongly about this issue and had the courage to convey their concerns to the governor. Most of the writers disavowed any affiliation with the FLDS or even sympathy for our religious beliefs. What these people saw, however, was a group of American citizens singled out for persecution and being denied their constitutional rights.
The volume of letters reached its peak immediately after the forced separation of the children from their mothers at the Coliseum in San Angelo on April 24. At this time the general tone of the communications rose from concern to outrage. No amount of public support can undo the damage that has been done to children and parents the past two months; however, it is comforting to know that in the battle to preserve constitutional rights, we are not alone.

Excerpts from the Letters

Richwood, Texas
As a nurse, I have attempted to contact “child protective services” when I have witnessed blatant neglect and abuse. I was told that the case workers’ loads were too heavy to deal with anything except a “potential for immediate life threatening situations.” Somehow though, this same system can immediately mount adequate resources to swiftly remove over four hundred children without even a substantial suggestion of risk. This smacks of personal agenda supported and sanctioned by state government. Media outlets ridicule the FLDS people for their modest dress and conservative habits. We hear about the evil of taking underage brides from the same sources that glamorize gangster rap, profanity, and 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 as freedom of expression and the pregnancies of single teen stars as exemplary leadership. Where is the outrage that every day our junior high schools are full of single, pregnant teens?
-snip-


The above article mentions Brooke Adams.
If any of you want to read a very clear and fair minded account of such an emotional issue as this has become then you want to read Brooke Adams. She is amazing at keeping her head when all about her are losing theirs.
Here is her link

http://blogs.sltrib.com/plurallife/
 
Alvin, Texas
I’m a physician at a small Emergency Room. Tonight I saw one of the children from the FLDS compound who was recently bused to a nearby community. I want to express to you my extreme concern about this baby and all of the very young children in this current situation. The child I saw was under two years old, has been separated from her mother and all familiar adults, taken away from familiar surroundings, and been the subject of intense scrutiny which the child can’t understand. Now the child is ill. I have never seen such a listless, subdued, sad toddler in my life. She doesn’t eat well and her caretaker thinks she may have been breastfed at home as she is so much trouble with bottles. She is losing weight. She doesn’t play with things. She is almost non-responsive to the strange adults around her. This is a child in profound mourning for the loss of her mother, who is sick and by all appearances is going to get sicker.
Why on earth can this mother not be here to comfort this baby? I am not exaggerating in the least when I say this child looks like she wants to die….
Please do something to reunite at least these small infants with their mothers. This is so wrong.

http://www.truthwillprevail.org/index.php?parentid=1&index=64
 
They know just the opposite in fact. These children were awakened and interrogated in the middle of the night. The adults around them were distressed and anxious. They were removed from their home and had to bathe in a bucket and eat crappy food. Then they were separated from their mothers while they tried to appeal to the policemen who were there for help...to the point that it made the policemen break down in tears.

Of course this situtation is heartbreaking for all concerned. It is never easy to separate children from their parents. That does not mean that CPS should not intervene when abuse is suspected. In the long run, it is best for the children to be removed from situations where they are neglected and abused. Given enough time, they would see that people were only trying to make things better for them.

As for the crappy food part, most of them don't eat well. I am sure they were provided with more food than they are used to. As sad as it is, they don't get enough to eat and have poor nutrition. What do you think their daily lives are really like? Can you image, for example, having 40 siblings and 16 mothers? Do you think their houses have 50 or 40 or 30 or even 20 bedrooms to accomodate them? Only the wealthier members can afford more than one home and they still cannot afford to feed them properly.



Actually, while in foster care they were tested and found to be at or above grade level as per the public school curriculum requirements. From what limited information is available.


http://www.sltrib.com/News/ci_9415203

Some chidlren are lacking in science and social skills. There are no health classes. Some teenagers have no idea how babies are made. They are taught that dinosaurs never existed and man has never really been is space. Does that sound like a quality education to you?


It would be interesting to see how many of the FLDS women have degrees or professions aside from just "jobs" and then compare that to women in mainstream society who have degrees and professions instead of just "jobs".

If you listen to the women who have been raised in the FLDS they will tell you that most women are not allowed to have an education. And those that do often are not allowed to pursue careers.

not sure what you mean here.

I mean that eduation gives people choices so it is frowned upon in the FLDS. Some people are given permission to got college, but not many. An educated person can leave the FLDS and develop a life of their own which is threatening to the church.

Peace,

Montana
 
In the early days when I would read comments from readers at the various news sites covering this case, I felt I was in the minority in thinking the children should be returned. Turns out that emails 14:1 felt the same way. I guess while inaccurate, that is what I was "supposed" to think. Seems the governers office wanted it that way....

The problem with this statement is that we have no idea who the people were that were giving these responses. It could be that pro FLDS were e-mailing to sway public opinion. This is not a scientific example of what people really think. There is no accountability.


Public sentiment, as reflected in contacts with the governor of Texas, ran 449:32 in favor of sending the kids home- that's 14:1, and that was within the first three days. So the state set up a propaganda arm:


State officials kept tabs on media reports from across the country and circulated talking points to ensure public comments stayed consistent and on target.
Kathy Walt, Perry's deputy chief of staff, said in an April 18 e-mail that if media were "overlooking" testimony about alleged abuse, the staff should give reporters court documents and "talk the issues over with them."


The key words here are "if the media were overlookig testimony of alleged abuse", how is this wrong? They are trying to keep everyone focused on the facts by providing court documents.

also in print here, proof that the government planned to lie to the mothers, the ones that CPS said were complicating identification by "lying"to CPS :rolleyes:....


The women were to be told only that they were moving to the coliseum, the e-mails show.

And what is it that you feel they should have been told in addition to this? I don't get it.

http://www.sltrib.com/Polygamy/ci_9537072


Peace,

Montana
 
Hi SewingDeb,

Youre right, the judge cant control what happens all over the state. But as a District Court Judge she can control what goes on in Bexar County. Unfortunately for CPS, in all their wisdom, this is where they sent the child. That gave this Judge jurisdiction. I guess the restraining order means that they are released from the vaguely put together "family Plan" and the "visits" by CPS? Does anyone know if that is what the restraining order means?

That's the way I took it but I don't really know. Doesn't strike me right for some reason. There are conditions for the return of the children as in any case CPS handles. Is the judge tying CPS' hands in that county?
 
Hey SewingDeb!

I really dont know the answer since I am not very "legal" savvy.

I was thinking that it just would apply to that one family and not other cases that CPS might be handling in that particular county. That makes me wonder if there are other FLDS children in that county if they could get the same order from the same Judge based on using this first case as a precedent?

I have no idea - just half baked thoughts :crazy:
 
May be just that family, Glow (and any other FLDS families with children in foster care in Bexar County) but it seems like a broad sweeping statement from the judge.
 
As for the crappy food part, most of them don't eat well. I am sure they were provided with more food than they are used to. As sad as it is, they don't get enough to eat and have poor nutrition.

Morning Montana!

I was curious to see why you felt the way you do in the sentence above. Did you read this somewhere?

What do you think their daily lives are really like? Can you image, for example, having 40 siblings and 16 mothers? Do you think their houses have 50 or 40 or 30 or even 20 bedrooms to accomodate them? Only the wealthier members can afford more than one home and they still cannot afford to feed them properly.

Well I think their daily lives are a lot different then mine, but I dont think they are "less" then mine - just different. Im 50 so I was a teen and young adult back in the hippy era and communes were the "thing". My best friend of the last 25 years was living in one before I knew her. When she and I met in our mid 20s she was just a hippy living in a little house doing all her vegan stuff! Anyway, she has many interesting stories to tell of back in the day...

The whole concept of communal living is not a new one. Some Indian tribes lived that way in the past and some still do today. If you go visit a reservation you will find that they still assign a great deal of the childraising responsibility to relatives, especially the grandparents.

You and I are part of the mainstream culture of America. The FLDS, the Native Americans and others are not mainstream. Because of that, their ways appear "odd" or different to us. We have to be very careful that we dont superimpose our ways on to the picture as being "better". Different, yes. Better, no.




Some chidlren are lacking in science and social skills. There are no health classes. Some teenagers have no idea how babies are made. They are taught that dinosaurs never existed and man has never really been is space. Does that sound like a quality education to you?

How do you know what they they have been taught or not taught? Did you read that somewhere?

I do know that we have nothing to brag about as far as schooling goes in America. Here is just one quote, happened to be the first one I googled -

"The United States is falling when it comes to international education rankings, as recent studies show that other nations in the developed world have more effective education systems.

In a 2003 study conducted by UNICEF that took the averages from five different international education studies, the researchers ranked the United States No. 18 out of 24 nations in terms of the relative effectiveness of its educational system.

Another prominent 2003 study, the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, shows a steady decline in the performance of American students from grades 4 to 12 in comparison to their peers in other countries.

The TIMSS results reveal a lot about the weaknesses of the U.S. education system, said David Marsh, a professor at the University of Southern California Rossier School of Education.
“In fourth grade, American kids do above average internationally. By eighth grade, they slip a bit, and by 12th-grade, they’ve slipped a lot,” Marsh said. “We’re the only country that slides down that much from fourth to 12th grade.”

http://kapio.kcc.hawaii.edu/upload/fullnews.php?id=52

In light of that I cant rush to condemn them. I would need to know more facts.
 
May be just that family, Glow (and any other FLDS families with children in foster care in Bexar County) but it seems like a broad sweeping statement from the judge.

I agree...I think the words "broad" and "sweeping are part of what has been wrong here from the beginning. On everyone's part!

I think if the mind set had been of words like "small" and "limited" CPS, Judge Walther, and so on would have had more success.
 
I agree...I think the words "broad" and "sweeping are part of what has been wrong here from the beginning. On everyone's part!

I think if the mind set had been of words like "small" and "limited" CPS, Judge Walther, and so on would have had more success.

I do agree with you there.
 
CPS has compiled the residential information for the Eldorado children, and it includes 178 children in 33 households in the San Antonio area, and 143 children in 30 households at the YFZ Ranch in Eldorado. The remaining children are living in different areas of Texas, and out of consideration for the families’ privacy other detailed residential information will not be released.
The Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) has received partial DNA results from the maternity and paternity testing ordered by Judge Walther. The results are being reviewed and analyzed to determine if the DNA results can help investigators in the multiple investigations determine if abuse occurred.
The CPS abuse/neglect investigations involving the children at the YFZ Ranch continue, and the agency is reviewing information previously gathered. If CPS determines it is necessary in the case of any particular child, interviews will be conducted of children, parents, and any other individuals who may help determine if abuse or neglect occurred. That is standard procedure in an investigation. CPS will rely on the parents’ cooperation in this effort, and will be referring to the judge’s June 2 order for guidance.

http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/About/News/2008/eldorado/2008-06-12_update.asp
 
There has been a LOT of ranting and raving over this very sensitive case.


Thought I would present one from each side.

The Ranter

I keep getting asked why I stick my very big nose in this issue, and the answer remains the same:
I have a 21 year old Son in the 1st. Cavalry in Texas who just might die protecting the Constitution of the United States. To sit here and see the goons in tanks and battle gear moving against 465 children doesn’t sit well with me, I think they have Constitutional Rights too as well as the protection of Due Process which Texas seems to have overlooked in this case.
After 30 million bucks, let’s see some broken bones. Let’s see some sexually abused boys, Let’s see the 31 girls that CPS saw either pregnant or with a baby that they used as an excuse to kidnap (Supreme Court) all the children. Let’s see Sarah and the man who was beating her from a few hundred miles away. Let’s see ANYTHING that CPS used as an excuse to Pesecute these people that holds water today.

http://www.flds.ws/2008/06/11/state...se-now-claims-flds-is-the-mafia/#comment-1357

The Raver
Child Protective Services was right to remove those children from the YFZ Ranch near Eldorado in April. They were right to sweep them all into state custody, right to separate them from their parents and right to demand full DNA testing.
Yes, I also agree with the Third Court of Appeals ruling that they should now be returned to their parents and carefully monitored in a home environment. And I'm glad the Texas Supreme Court not only upheld that ruling but allowed for a list of restrictions for the next year, along with full powers granted to the CPS to intervene again if necessary.
But none of that would have been possible had CPS not swooped down on the YFZ ranch with such ear-splitting sound and fury in the first place. It is precisely because of their actions in April that these children are now probably safe.

http://www.gosanangelo.com/news/2008/jun/12/cps-deserves-praise-for-raid-on-yfz-ranch/

Who makes the better case?
 
Cost of the raid to exceed $14 million.

http://www.star-telegram.com/804/story/699646.html

As a Texas resident & tax payer I have mixed reactions. If the raid had actually accomplished something positive for the children it would have been well worth the cost. As it is, it seems to me that the biggest accomplishments are a huge bill for the tax payers, a lot of stressed out people on both sides of the issue & the kids are right back in the same situation but with the additional trauma caused by the raid. Surely, CPS could have considered all possibilities before rushing in like a bunch of cowboys.
 
Again, CPS and LE got it 100% wrong.



Friday, June 13, 2008

That one girl? She does not have a child
Texas attorney Natalie Malonis created quite a stir a couple weeks ago when she stood in an open courtroom in San Angelo and said she was worried that Judge Barbara Walther might send her client home.

Natalie said she had reason to believe the 16-year-old girl, a daughter of Annette and Warren Jeffs, might have had a child who was being claimed by another mother.

Now the rest of the story: Not true. I spoke to Natalie today and she said it is now clear the girl has never been pregnant, never had a child. She said the initial suspicion had come from law enforcement, but was erroneous.

http://blogs.sltrib.com/plurallife/
 
I think (for me) it is easy to forget the day to day reality of this and how it would feel if I was in this same situation.

One Mothers Story...

May 29, 2008, 4:00 p.m. I went to get my driver's license renewed and was right in the middle of answering questions on the computer exam. Somehow I missed the sign to turn off my cell phone in the Texas Department of Transportation facility. I think it must have been too big to notice or something. How glad I am I got that phone call in spite of the eagle eye and the warning voice I received from an employee as the ring sounded its joyful reveille. I answered with a "hello" , and then I heard the exuberant voice of my teenage son, who triumphantly announced, "The Supreme Court has ruled. Mother, we're free! "
Okay, so be it, whatever it takes to get my children back. I feel concerned, but peaceful. I have long since forgiven these people for their outrages against us, but that cannot change the level of confidence I am able to offer them in the future. I am not thrilled at the thoughts of further investigation of a non-existent allegation. I am grateful to be getting the children back, but I would rather be left alone unbothered to gather my innocent ones and begin the long and tender healing process, the rehabilitation of mind and body and soul.
June 2, 2008, 10:00 a.m. Suddenly, we receive word that all of the mothers can go get their children without waiting for a specific appointment. Our attorneys e-mail us the proper forms, and we are gratefully and anxiously ready to go NOW, even if we have to walk. But we have a deadline, 5:00 p.m. Oh, sure, we can pick up the children over the next several days, but who wants to wait until tomorrow? Which mother is willing to have her child be last? We receive word that our children at the shelters have been told that their mothers can now pick them up, and if the mothers don't show up, they just can't make it. Little does anyone know what a tender and heartrending situation that presents. How can we expect young, vulnerable minds to understand the reason for any delay? Our children are scattered all over the state of Texas, so how does a mother choose which child to rescue first? Oh, the pressure! Indescribable.
Both of my teenage sons have already insisted that I get their two little sisters first, so I have already traveled to San Antonio, the city nearest their location, to wait the moment of reunification. I have decided to begin with my youngest child, six years old, then travel one hour, retrieve my eight-year-old, and then go for the two boys, five hundred miles away. But, there is a very big challenge facing me. There are simply not enough vehicles to go around. I have always belonged to a caring and sharing environment where honest people look out for each other, lending vehicles and such back and forth to fit the needs. It is our way of life. It is efficient to share, and fulfilling to think of others.
I weigh these things over carefully in my mind as I watch my friends leaving to retrieve their children. No matter how deep the pain, I cannot bring myself to jump in front of someone else. How can I possibly feel good about rescuing my child and alleviating their pain at the expense of another mother's child? I believe that is how every mother feels, but somebody has to be first, and somebody has to be last. Finally, I am the only mother left in the house. All the vehicles have been filled and gone, the minutes are ticking by, and I am weeping. It is just too big for me. There is no way I can endure that kind of suffering, the pain of the awareness that my little ones would feel the hurt of betrayal from their very own mother, the hurt of being forced into an unexplainable and compromising circumstance beyond my control, yet knowing that I will have to take responsibility for my choice in the matter, and by so doing, I must take upon myself that gnawing pain of knowing that my children are suffering and I can do little about it. There is nothing to do but to place my burden at the feet of my loving Heavenly Father. He will bear that for me, and now I know that He will take care of everything. How do I describe a heart-broken smile? But since the Lord helps those who help themselves, I am not going to give up easily, so I continue earnestly looking for solutions.
1:45 p.m. Think, pray, cry, smile. My phone rings. None other than my darling six-year-old daughter is calling from a shelter that allows one phone call per child per day. Her voice is broken and frantic, "Mother, where are you? When are you coming to get me? I am one of the last ones left here. " How do I process that? I feel so desperately small and inadequate to care for this precious child. It feels like someone has taken a sledge hammer and smashed my heart into a thousand pieces, yet I feel the courage and reassurance of Someone much greater than I, so I tell her to hang on and smile, that I am coming very soon. My next thoughts are getting more radical. No matter what, I have to get my children today. My first instinct is to take off walking and thumb a ride. Surely, someone will stop for a lady in a pastel dress lugging a briefcase filled with birth certificates, medical records, school records, pictures, proof of parental custody. My next idea, a little more rational than the first, is to run door to door in the neighborhood and plead with each person I meet to either lend me a vehicle, or take me to find my children.
2:00 p.m. Hey! What about a taxi? How much will it cost? I look in my purse and find fifty dollars. Next, I find the Yellow Pages. T, t, t, ta, tax—there it is, taxi. I call three numbers before I get a real person with a real voice. I am a little hyper by now. "How much will you charge to take me from San Antonio to Converse? " I can hear the fingers whisking over a keyboard to obtain the information. "Fifty dollars, Ma'am. " Hmm, spend all my money just to get to my first stop? Then what? I wonder about taking a gamble. If I can just get over there, by the time I fill out the paper work and pick up my littlest girl, surely something else will work out.
My phone rings, a friend of mine. "Maggie, you have got to get over here to Gonzales. Your eight-year-old daughter is really worried about you not making it. She is so afraid to be left alone here overnight. If you don't hurry, she is going to be the last one here. " I hang up the phone, and I also hang my head in exquisitely painful concern. "How do things like this happen? " I ask myself. "What does a Mother do with a crisis like this? " There is no way I can call my daughter and console her. She is only allowed one phone call per week, and today is not the day. It feels like the weight of all time is hanging on the present moment, and those moments are ticking away, and I have miles to travel and children to rescue before 5:00.
3:15 p.m. We arrive at the shelter in Converse, and after anxiously waiting a little while and then wading through the paperwork, my sweet, little girl, tearful but smiling, is handed over to her mother. We load up, and she parks herself on top of me with her giant-size bear cub hugs, and we depart the facility with great rejoicing.She remarks in a matter-of-fact tone of voice, "Mother, you must've got my message to the Judge so I can go home with you today. I sure wish she would call me because I want to tell her a sermon. " The next thing she wants to do is call her older brothers and check up on them. She has been denied any kind of communication with them for two months because they were accused of being "perpetrators" , and now, she is very anxious for a reunion.
3:35 p.m. Since we have not been allowed any cell phone numbers to our children's CPS caseworkers, before I leave Converse, I ask my first daughter's caseworker to call her co-worker at my next stop to tell her I am coming and that I must pick up my daughter today. She sends back a message that she will be there only until 5:00. My friend sets his GPS for Gonzales and steps on the gas because it is roughly an hour's journey, and the paperwork process takes about half an hour.
This experience of losing our way for a while on this most crucial time-sensitive mission for the sake of a child brings a tender memory to weigh upon my heart, and I find myself in deep contemplation of the depth of trauma upon my sensitive and vulnerable eight-year-old daughter. May 5, 2008, would have been the day of my first visit with this sweet and precious little girl after she was taken by the State. There is a unique detail about her in that she was the first child on the first bus taken April 4, 2008. I was absent during the Raid, traveling out of state. My daughter was numbered among the first group of girls taken without their mothers, and even after the rest of the buses arrived at the temporary shelters with both children and mothers, the first group of girls was still not allowed to be with any mothers. I had heard through reports of friends that my little girl had been greatly suffering over the traumatic events, and I was tenderly cognizant of her intense need to at least visit with her mother. Finally, after thirty-two days, I had an appointment to meet with her.
The caseworker reacted in a coldly professional manner, saying her day was booked until 5:00, and made a comment indicating her suspicion of my sincerity, saying that it appeared odd to her that I would be late for my visit. I replied that I was well acquainted with the mother whose one-hour visit followed mine, saying that I was sure the mother would be glad to share her hour with me for the sake of the child. The caseworker did not seem to understand that kind of mentality and appeared confused at the probability of such an arrangement. I assured the caseworker that I was confident the other mother would feel fine about sharing because we loved each other and would do what was best for all of the children. I told her I would call the mother and make sure it was all right and then call her back, but when I tried to reach the caseworker again, she was conveniently unavailable.
I submitted my identification to the officer, and then I waited fifteen minutes in severe anxiety, realizing that my remaining half hour was wasting away. I could only imagine my little daughter inside of the formidable fortress, anxious and distressed, expecting the long-awaited visit from her mother. I could visualize her in tears questioning my delay, worried over my safety, heartsick with loneliness, traumatized by memories of bad guys with guns. Finally, an officer approached our vehicle and flatly told me, "Mrs. Jessop, they have sent word that since you are late for your visit, you will not be allowed to see your daughter today, and we would like you to leave now. " There was no explanation about the fact that I had been waiting for fifteen minutes.
I hung up the phone heart-broken. I felt the frustration flare up inside of me, but then my emotions defaulted to a defense mechanism I often employ, and I broke out in a laugh, incredulous at the injustice in my life. I rather suspect I confused the poor officer who watched me intently, obviously expecting some kind of a nuclear reaction and preparing his self-defense at the onset. Striving to maintain a resemblance of dignity, I remarked, ‘Well, it won't do any good to get angry, will it? " He enthusiastically agreed. I searched his face for any expression of kindly understanding, and observing a small glimmer, I clung to a spark of hope, just one last solution to an impossible situation. I held up a picture of myself that I had planned to give to my little girl, and I asked the officer, "Well, if you won't let me visit my daughter, at least will you take this picture of her mother to her? " The officer immediately stiffened, and replied coldly, "No ma'am, I can't do anything like that. No ma'am. "As we drove away from the facility, a chilling numbness wrapped itself around my heart, the harsh reality of unpreventable injustice, and I felt helplessly appalled at the inhumanity of gross misunderstanding. I knew that the state employees didn't really have anything against me personally, but it was painfully obvious that we were victims of an intrusive and manipulative invasion of a government entity out of control, a nameless, faceless monster, bloated with horrendous pride and vindictive prejudice, fed by the hateful sap flowing en masse from the venomous fangs of anti-FLDS crusaders. The evil demon, motivated by anger, jealousy, lying, hate, money, power, and corruption, had wound its vicious tentacles in and out, around and among hundreds of unaware, yet corruptible human beings, servants of the vast domain of the State of Texas. What a shame that people in responsible positions would be foolish and gullible enough to allow themselves to be "educated" by contemptible snakes and their lying propaganda against us, and then without conscience, form biased and inaccurate opinions without taking responsibility for their own actions, apparently incapable of searching for truth, allowing themselves to be controlled by the Master Puppeteer. We know the CPS is not the instigator of this despicable crime. They simply and detestably fall into the identity of the wicked tool, a destructive sledgehammer, slathered with the murky grease of religious and political corruption, intended to mar and destroy an unpopular religion, wielded by none other than Satan himself.Really? Crying? Whatever for? I felt the anger boil up hotly, and I grappled intently for a few moments with the powerful and conflicting emotions of anger versus forgiveness. Then I said, "Hello, Sweetie! They won't let me see you today, but everything is all right. We must not change how we act because of how they act. Let's make the best of this and be happy anyway. I don't get to see you, but I am thankful I get to talk to you. "
Then I could hear her sobbing, and I wanted to join her, but I knew that wouldn't help her at all. There was no way we could carry on a conversation, so the only thing left to do was sing. So, with purchased courage from the unlimited Source, granted through the channel of gratitude, the heart-broken mother serenaded her heart-broken daughter.
After the song was finished, I asked my little girl if she would like to sing. She replied in a thin voice, broken by emotion, "I want to sing for you, Mother, but I just can't," and then the sobbing increased. About then, the shelter employee who was monitoring the phone call announced our time was up. I think both the mother and child cried themselves to sleep that night. The next day I got a surprise phone call. Someone must have been very kind to arrange it for us, and there was my little girl again, only this time, her voice was strong and clear and full of hope and courage. "Mother," she announced happily, "I have a song for you! " I was overjoyed to see her resiliency from the traumatic experience the day before. Then she sang for me high and clear in angelic tones, "God Be with You Till We Meet Again. " Oh, I had a great deal to be grateful for than night.
There is not room enough in the small car to consider getting the two boys five hundred miles away. I find I have to land and regroup and find another way to complete my task of gathering my children. My good friend who has been so wonderfully instrumental in preserving my sanity this day makes sure I find my way to a stopover location, and then without any ceremony, he quietly and graciously hands to me three hundred dollars. Words cannot express my gratitude for our good men. What a blessing it is to belong to a favored bunch, to have that common bond of understanding so characteristic among our people, that certain something that is only obtained by giving without expecting anything in return, creating a level of trust and confidence that is not generally understood by others.
It has taken everything I have in me to leave them, though as to their safety, I have no doubt. There is nothing I can say to quiet their fear of being dragged away from Mother again. The only way I can find peace and reassurance is to recall the comforting words, "This, too, shall pass away. " This is the longest ride of my life
Just as I expect, the first thing the boys want to do is call their sisters and brothers to determine their safety and comfort. We travel all during the night, reaching our rendezvous point June 4, weary but grateful. How does a mother describe her relief to see her children finally together after an excruciating ordeal?
Texas, and her almighty papa, the governor himself, has invited me to find another state in which to reside, yet I am bound by red tape to remain here under the scrutiny of Rick Perry's Doberman pinscher, the CPS. If I only could, I would walk to safety beyond the borders of Texas; but I smile at that thought because my shoes are gone, lost somewhere over the last thousand miles, as I transferred vehicles seven times. But I am alive, and I have my children, and I am unspeakably grateful for that.
http://www.truthwillprevail.org/
 
A little background information on the following letter. Brooke Adams is a reporter. She wrote the following letter as an open letter on her blog. The "Betty" being referred to is Carolyn's daughter. Carolyn fled the FLDS with her children. As soon as Betty was old enough to legally do so, she went BACK to live as an FLDS woman.




Dear Carolyn Jessop,

How are you? It's been a busy couple of months, hasn't it? I was in Texas for about six weeks. I think you were there about that long, too.

I noticed your book is back on The New York Times bestseller list.

Tell me something I don't know!

Every day I get emails and phone calls from people wanting to know if I have your phone number, email address, home address, etc. I have even participated in one book club discussions about you and your book.

Wow. That is something I never expected to do as a journalist.

I have listened to and read entire life histories of people who related to your book. Again, wow.

And I read today in Variety that your book will be made into a movie. Funny, they mixed up that bit about your testimony sending Warren Jeffs to prison. You did not testify, although you were waiting in the wings, so to speak. I think the writer had Elissa Wall in mind. Her book has been optioned for a movie, too. We know who will play you (Kathryn Heigel, but who will play Elissa??? Reese Witherspoon?)

Don't worry. I don't share your personal information with all these callers and emailers, but I tell them what I can.

I feel like your PR person!!!

They all want to know the latest: Did you get married again? How are your childen? And, especially, how is Betty and are you in touch with her?

I tell them what I know, based on the last time I spoke with you: You are great. Not married yet. Kids are into karate and doing fine. You talk to Betty regularly.

Although, that was before the YFZ Ranch raid.

Is there an update?

As I wrote in one article, you were front and center in the early weeks of the largest child custody action in U.S. history, helping to educate Texas Child Protective Services about the FLDS. I ran into you while you were doing an interview with the Oprah show. Remember that?

Here is something I haven’t told anyone: I met Betty, too.

She was sitting on a bench outside Courtroom A, waiting as we all were for Judge Barbara Walther to take the bench and tell us what she was going to do about the Texas Supreme Court ruling.

I sat down on the bench, took one look at her and knew who she was. Betty looked just like she did in that photo in your book, the one where she was snowboarding.

I greeted a woman who was with her by name and said to Betty: “I know who you are but I am not going to say your name aloud.”

There were a bunch of other reporters standing around and they had no clue.

Betty said, ''Thank you.''

She is lovely.

Betty sat through the hearing for only a short time. I did not see her leave but when I finally looked for her, she was gone.

I sure would like to interview her and hear all about why she went back to the FLDS after four years outside the religion.

Maybe some day.

Meanwhile, I will keep telling your fans what I know: You are doing very well. So is Betty. And as far as I know, she is still not married.

Sincerely,

Brooke Adams
 
How do you know what they they have been taught or not taught? Did you read that somewhere? _ Glow

Yes of course. I have read several books, magazine articles and have followed the news. I was just too lazy to post all of my sources.
 
An interesting viewpoint


quote-
I am a Baptist, so my interest in this case doesn’t come from a shared religious perspective. It emanates from an understanding that the only proper ends of government is to protect the liberty of it’s citizens.

Watching the national news reports would lead on to believe that the government has a right to come into any persons home to ensure that they are complying with every law under the sun - from prohibitions against sex with children to the amount of water displaced when we flush our toilets.

I have no firsthand knowledge of the case, but have been appalled since first hearing of this tyranny visited upon a whole town (or the equivalent) because of dubious, non-specific claims made against a few individuals.

Are we to be free people, or shall we throw in the towel, allowing the government to perpetrate any evil so that they might “protect children”?

The populace has lost it’s understanding of what liberty means, and the responsibility it entails. Many cheer as the apologists of tyranny (exhibit #1 - Nancy Grace, high priestess (Temple Harlot) of the collectivists) poison the well, advocating every infringement of free peoples rights to boost ratings. They cheer as the natural right of hundreds of people were repudiated en mass - not for anything they had done, but for what an overzealous judge interpreted that they believed.

Again, I am not a Mormon of any stripe. I find Mormon theology to be kooky - and frankly, wrong (no offense intended, and I pray for the salvation of every well-intentioned member of this sect). The fact of the matter is, individuals who understand liberty and it’s implications have a moral responsibility to stand against the segments of the state who feel no legal restraint on their prying, so long as they can rationalize it as being ‘for the children’. Well…. I am doing it for the children too, For my children, that they might grow up able to live a life as free people, independent of the state verifying that they meet the demanded orthodoxy in the exercise of what they believe.

Right or wrong on the merits of their beliefs, I would be proud to stand with the FLDS to tell the suppressors of freedom that they cannot usurp our rights in the name of protecting us. Much evil has been perpetrated in this tragic play, but the government are the perpetrators.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
98
Guests online
398
Total visitors
496

Forum statistics

Threads
625,727
Messages
18,508,832
Members
240,837
Latest member
TikiTiki
Back
Top