The State v. Jodi Arias: break in trial until 28 January 2013 #15 *ADULT CONTENT*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #2,681
Ok. He said that if he's subpoenaed he will cooperate and comply with the process and there's no reason to think he won't. No reason to doubt the credibility of his testimony in advance.

What emails are we talking about?
BBM

No reason to think he won't, until he was allegedly trying to scare witnesses for the defense into altering/omitting testimony. If true, that's a huge credibility issue.

E-mails that CH apparently sent to TA addressing how he was treating JA. The DA implied it was about some sort of abusive relationship.
 
  • #2,682
Visual for those who aren't watching.

14j9f1h.png

Holy hair batman!!!
 
  • #2,683
What's confusing to me is that why didn't Nurmi know , before this hearing, that Searcy had a "friend" in the car with him who he didn't want to serve up. Was this new information to Nurmi? I don't get it. He's Nurmi's witness. Why didn't he anticipate this?
 
  • #2,684
Ok I'll bite on this...

I'll try an opposing view... try.

- there will be other aspects to the supposed abuse (mainly only verbal/txt evidence IMO) and the anal aspect probably too. I think anal is out she did it with old boyfriend. Even CH email implied that TA was treating JA badly (we will see if it comes in)and there maybe be additional stuff. IMO it would have to be really really damning abuse for a SD claim.

- the pics in the shower are not important to the defense IMO except they show she didn't kill him. The defense should/could say that he didn't verbally abuse her or physically attack her... just saying. I'm lost on this one IMO pictures show she did kill TA and I think the defense wants to show TA verbally abused and physically attacked her. Maybe I'm reading your statement wrong?

- it seems to me (I may be wrong of course) that Travis sees her at one point taking pictures before being shot/stabbed. This guy obviously saw her too. I still can't understand the sitting down part... but that may have just been resting since he couldn't fall asleep with psycho over. I don't think he was that frightened of her and probably saw obsessive but not murderer.

- IMO the vile part may be something in addition to the anal. See above anal comment.

- The gas cans are TUFF to argue... but I will try.

* Didn't want anyone/family/payor to see any gas charges somewhere she shouldn't be or didn't tell him/her/them. Yet she kept the receipts of where she went.
* Wasn't sure if would have money at a certain point on her card(s)... unless she or someone made a deposit. She deposited 800.00 on that trip.
* Paranoid (in addition to psycho) about gas. Always have to have extra gas in her car because doesn't trust gas gages and might be in desert. Good point:)

Any of those any good?

Her defense is getting slapped around... but then again she left them with nothing but red flags and poison arrows.
 
  • #2,685
  • #2,686
  • #2,687
BBM

No reason to think he won't, until he was allegedly trying to scare witnesses for the defense into altering/omitting testimony. If true, that's a huge credibility issue.

E-mails that CH apparently sent to TA addressing how he was treating JA. The DA implied it was about some sort of abusive relationship.

Where did you get the idea that he was trying to scare defense witnesses into altering/omitting testimony?
 
  • #2,688
  • #2,689
Having done it maybe once is "very experienced"?


Yeah, he didn't ask her to take them. That doesn't mean he cared one way or the other. He did not solicit the picture-taking. He stated he did not ask her to delete them, which implies he didn't care they existed.


I think you may be misstating things a little. But it's your opinion, so okay.


I do agree that she's in a pretty deep hole at the moment...

Re: "maybe one time"..
Problem is that prior he has stated it wasn't JUST ONE TIME..

Re: ex bf shower pics and that INYO he likely didn't care since he didn't ask her to delete them.
Yet again the problem is that prior he DID STATE THAT HE TOLD HER TO DELETE THEM.

Re: misstating some things.
MOO is that she hasn't misspoken about anything..there is a pattern where the defendant is concerned...a pattern IMO that is extremely relevant to the first degree murder for which she's charged.
 
  • #2,690
  • #2,691
What's confusing to me is that why didn't Nurmi know , before this hearing, that Searcy had a "friend" in the car with him who he didn't want to serve up. Was this new information to Nurmi? I don't get it. He's Nurmi's witness. Why didn't he anticipate this?

He did know. That's why he asked and said to not give him a name when he asked.
 
  • #2,692
Just getting caught up. I'm speechless :what: and :floorlaugh:
 
  • #2,693
I think we all agree that Travis was an imperfect human being. Defending Travis and believing that Jodi brutally murdered him without justification is not the equivalent of thinking Travis was perfect and flawless.

I think most of us also agree that Jodi murdered Travis without justification, legal or otherwise. Pointing out that Travis used bad judgment ("was playing with fire") when he remained engaged with a clearly unstable, stalker-ish ex-girlfriend is in no way implying that Travis somehow deserved what he got, or that Jodi was justified in murdering him, or that he brought this on himself.

This is so true...I was in a relationship where even after it ended, we continued to meet up with one another because that was what we were used to and it is common to miss what you had. Eventually, it should wear off once both people have met someone else, but this clearly is a case of "if I can't have him, no one can." Jodi did meet someone else and clearly could not move on. Also, Travis is a human being and honestly, without regard to religion, I don't blame him for wanting to meet his needs with Jodi since she was so willing to give it up.
 
  • #2,694
Oh and I would totally respect Jean C more if she'd pick a damn side! Its so irritating how she plays up the defense during the *daytime* IS crowd, and plays up the prosecution for Jane & Nancy! There I said it... I feel better already :)
 
  • #2,695
And for my next trick ...

348gldx.png


2nsuw42.png

I think the stinky tie trick was to look like he was on the stand numerous times - for days and days - because his testimony (and his input, don't forget about his input) were soooooo important.
 
  • #2,696
Katie, I can't wait to hear what you find out - from the outside or the inside! Are you on Twitter and if so, can we follow you?

Do you know yet what you will be wearing so that we might spot you in the courtroom?

I think the card to Travis' family is a lovely idea! That is a very sweet and thoughtful idea.

I don't know yet what I will wear. It will be (whatever I can squeeze in to of my nice clothes) what I uncover in the morning that's clean. I'll let you guys know once I'm in there where I'm sitting and how you can id me. I have an account on twitter but I hardly ever use it...I'm not very literate on twitter. I can't use my phone in court once it starts but I can post while we are waiting...so i will give you guys the scoop once I know something! :seeya:
 
  • #2,697
  • #2,698
  • #2,699
BBM

No reason to think he won't, until he was allegedly trying to scare witnesses for the defense into altering/omitting testimony. If true, that's a huge credibility issue.

E-mails that CH apparently sent to TA addressing how he was treating JA. The DA implied it was about some sort of abusive relationship.

Where is the evidence that Chris was trying to scare a witness?

Please don't say the "not relevant ..... what happens if i decline on the 5th"..
 
  • #2,700
Katie, I can't wait to hear what you find out - from the outside or the inside! Are you on Twitter and if so, can we follow you?

Do you know yet what you will be wearing so that we might spot you in the courtroom?

I think the card to Travis' family is a lovely idea! That is a very sweet and thoughtful idea.

YES!!!!! if you see nancy grace can you please tell her to stop calling her JODI ALEXANDER!!!!!!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
1,032
Total visitors
1,174

Forum statistics

Threads
632,404
Messages
18,626,018
Members
243,140
Latest member
raezofsunshine83
Back
Top