I wonder how the defense is going to explain those gas cans. It's looking more and more like they are going to have to put Jodi on the stand.
So on the gas cans. She got 2- 5gal cans from the x and bought 1 from wally world. Did I get that right?
I wonder how the defense is going to explain those gas cans. It's looking more and more like they are going to have to put Jodi on the stand.
As soon as it is filed with the court, it then becomes public record unless it is sealed by the Judge, which in this case, it wasn't.When was the defense list released? Publicly?
Yes, everyone is entitled to a defense. Even them. However, I've been on the other side as a victim and had my character assassinated by a defense attorney. Rape case. I was taking a cab to work after my car broke down and he decided I wasn't going to work. That attorney poisoned me against what they do. Sorry, I can't help it. Nobody knows what that feels like if they haven't been there.
:what:Are we allowed to discuss the Jodi Arias Is Innocent website?
I was looking for information on the witness lists and came across the poster CJ. After reading many of her posts and looking at her avatar picture...could it be....the Other One? Perhaps she's trying out a little of that paralegal work.
I do not mean any offense by this, but you're operating backwards (Going from already have formed a conclusive opinion to a different opinion, not starting from nothing and going to something). The defense is trying to show it was self defense, because Arias was abused. It is then necessary to show that Arias was actually abused. If there are e-mails from the victim's best friend to the victim saying that he's not treating her right, and it may be interpreted as he's being abusive to her... It certainly matters to the defense case. The question is no longer did Arias do it; we know she did. The question the defense is hoping to bring up is if Arias did it in self defense.
So who is yet up for the defense?
La Violette
Richard Samuels.
The polygrapher
Jodi (!)
Who else?
Yes, everyone is entitled to a defense. Even them. However, I've been on the other side as a victim and had my character assassinated by a defense attorney. Rape case. I was taking a cab to work after my car broke down and he decided I wasn't going to work. That attorney poisoned me against what they do. Sorry, I can't help it. Nobody knows what that feels like if they haven't been there.
Casey Anthony? Here is the avatar:
![]()
Speaking of Nurmi, the private practice he established (and wanted to leave JA's case to go work on) specializes in defending accused sexual offenders/criminals. From his website:
Yeah, he's as bad as I thought.
I'm so sorry and I hope the freak that hurt you dies cold wet alone and soon.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you! Especially after the new pictures of her came out sitting on the beach. It's the same hat! If you find one of her posts that is in blue, you can click on it and it takes you to the Casey Is Innocent website to discuss all about THAT case.
I really think she's trying out her paralegal hat with the Jodi Arias case.
Intuitively obvious to the most casual observer..moocow, what is your one liner that speaks truth? You always have such great defense comebacks when taken solo.
So much for the conservative attire that Jodi always wears at those functions.
Exactly! They are two of a kind....maybe they can be BFF's after this.I think she's jealous Jodi is getting attention. Maybe Casey "reached out" and us now pen pals?
He's already dead. He got 99 years and served 7. Yes, SEVEN. When he got out, he lasted about 5 years and died of AIDS, which thankfully, wasn't around when I 'met' him.
As soon as it is filed with the court, it then becomes public record unless it is sealed by the Judge, which in this case, it wasn't.
Lovingly referred to, by the HoneyBooBoo types, as "corn hole".
Since you asked, I still think that it can be argued that it doesn't really show that she set out intending to kill anyone. She may have thought about it and prepared, but the decision may not have actually been made until whatever the catalyst was that night occurred. In an instance like that, I think premeditation becomes a large gray area.
I'm sorry you misunderstand based on the above post.I do not mean any offense by this, but you're operating backwards (Going from already have formed a conclusive opinion to a different opinion, not starting from nothing and going to something). The defense is trying to show it was self defense, because Arias was abused. It is then necessary to show that Arias was actually abused. If there are e-mails from the victim's best friend to the victim saying that he's not treating her right, and it may be interpreted as he's being abusive to her... It certainly matters to the defense case. The question is no longer did Arias do it; we know she did. The question the defense is hoping to bring up is if Arias did it in self defense.
Since you asked, I still think that it can be argued that it doesn't really show that she set out intending to kill anyone. She may have thought about it and prepared, but the decision may not have actually been made until whatever the catalyst was that night occurred. In an instance like that, I think premeditation becomes a large gray area.