Things that make you wonder

I've always felt that ALL the anthonys knew Caylee was deceased soon after cindys last 911 call. The anthonys didn't even rush to the sawgrass apt complex to look for their granddaughter, the last place she was suppose to have been seen. They never even left a flyer there and GA never even drove the billboard thru there! Seems like all their searching for caylee was done by phone and the internet..Oh and PI services by DC...just amazes me. I really wish LE would hurry up and charge them, they all belong in jail with casey!
 
anytime! I found the whole cake smashing a bit Cagneyesque...
LOL!

I had to Google the term 'Cagneyesque'...

Rude, grabby, ill-tempered, given to spasms of violence, brutish, etc.

Now, I can agree with you! :woohoo:

(I didn't REALLY think you were making a reference to the old t.v. show 'Cagney and Lacey')!
 
The only reason I don't necessarily agree with the date or otherwise rape threory, is I feel KC would have played that number to the hilt for sympathy and CA would have moved Heaven and Earth to find her assailant(s) and had them prosecuted. JMHO

My original thought around the rape theory (#264) was that either KC kept it a secret, making up the "father" - explains why all of the lying, or if she did tell CA, then I would think CA would move Heaven and Earth to not let anyone know (shame, embarrassment). Maybe that is the "family secret"?

Either way, it's just another theory to ponder.
 
I've always felt that ALL the anthonys knew Caylee was deceased soon after cindys last 911 call. The anthonys didn't even rush to the sawgrass apt complex to look for their granddaughter, the last place she was suppose to have been seen. They never even left a flyer there and GA never even drove the billboard thru there! Seems like all their searching for caylee was done by phone and the internet..Oh and PI services by DC...just amazes me. I really wish LE would hurry up and charge them, they all belong in jail with casey!

ITA. If you believe that they really bought KC's story, then why in the 100's of TV appearances CA and GA do, did they NOT ONCE say "Zani, please bring her home". come on, not one simple message to their beloved Caylee's abductor? EIther they simply did not believe KC or she told them a completely different version of events... i.e. accident and coverup. Of course they know now cause unless KC slipped and fell on top of Caylee with duct tape and heart shapped stickers, this was no accident.
 
LOL!

I had to Google the term 'Cagneyesque'...

Rude, grabby, ill-tempered, given to spasms of violence, brutish, etc.

Now, I can agree with you! :woohoo:

(I didn't REALLY think you were making a reference to the old t.v. show 'Cagney and Lacey')!

That sounds pretty good!! Actually it was from a movie with James Cagney and a grapefruit.
 
I wonder how many jail guards watch KC while she's tryin to pinch a loaf sitting on cold steel in the corner.

caseyorlandojail.jpg
 
I haven't read this entire thread yet, so hope I'm not repeating what someone else may have already thought and posted. I feel the reason CA had Caylee's body cremated was because she could stand the thought of burying her. By having her cremated, she still has Caylee with her in her home in a sense.

Yeah, I'm with ya, I can't fault them on choosing to have her cremated.. that whole burying thing gives me the creeps.
 
One thing that puzzles me, is why did CA have Caylees body cremated if KC didn't want it cremated? I would have expected the family to bow to KC's wishes in this, since they did in so many other things, and in fact it almost seems 'legally correct' to me that the mothers wishes must be honoured in this instance.

My point of view on this is that KC and her defense team actually did want Caylee cremated, look at all the things she could/should have said in her statement on Caylee's death and she felt the need to say I wanted her buried with a headstone??? I beleive it was a "preemptive strike", if you will, for the public. It's the defenses way of saying "See we have nothing to hide", and lets not forget how long the defense had Caylee's remains... Whatever was left of the poor little angel, is now ashes and unavailable for further review or analysis, see my point???
 
What I keep wondering about are the google searches for missing children's organizations, who did them, and did KFN show up in the results? This case is so crazy that I wouldn't be at all surprised if we find out the As knew something about KFN before June 15th.
 
What I keep wondering about are the google searches for missing children's organizations, who did them, and did KFN show up in the results? This case is so crazy that I wouldn't be at all surprised if we find out the As knew something about KFN before June 15th.


How accurate are the computer forensics about the dates of the searches? I can see GA or CA doing these searches after Caylee goes missing or after KC tells CA that the nanny took her. Why were the searches done before? KC would not need to make those searches b/c she knew where she put her. In any event, the search would have to be done after June 16th.

Is the type of science accurate? Is there no room for error when computer forensic expert looks at a computer and states for sure that this search was done on June 15th?
 
How accurate are the computer forensics about the dates of the searches? I can see GA or CA doing these searches after Caylee goes missing or after KC tells CA that the nanny took her. Why were the searches done before? KC would not need to make those searches b/c she knew where she put her. In any event, the search would have to be done after June 16th.

Is the type of science accurate? Is there no room for error when computer forensic expert looks at a computer and states for sure that this search was done on June 15th?

It was my understanding that they were done before the 15th. I would think that the forensic guys who checked the computer were very highly trained professionals, and I expect they would have got it right.

KFN showed up the day after Caylee was reported missing, so the searches would have had to have been done on the 16th for them to find KFN that way.

I wonder if any computer buffs here have been able to pinpoint the date of that search?
 
How accurate are the computer forensics about the dates of the searches? I can see GA or CA doing these searches after Caylee goes missing or after KC tells CA that the nanny took her. Why were the searches done before? KC would not need to make those searches b/c she knew where she put her. In any event, the search would have to be done after June 16th.

Is the type of science accurate? Is there no room for error when computer forensic expert looks at a computer and states for sure that this search was done on June 15th?

I just found this in the CNN transcripts for the 26th November...

BROOKS: OK, I want to go out to Kathi Belich, reporter for CNN affiliate WFTV. Kathi, who else in that house had access to that computer?

KATHI BELICH, WFTV: Well, it could have been George. The documents show George was not working at that time. Or it could have been Casey. Obviously, prosecutors believe it was Casey. That`s why they`re using this as evidence. That`s why it`s become public at this point. And you know, it`s important to note, too, that this was back in March. This was three months before Caylee had disappeared. And at the same time, Casey was also looking on line for missing children Web sites.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0811/26/ng.01.html

Seems it could have been George doing the missing children's group searches...I wonder if they are able to prove it was Casey?
 
Last night, on CNN..can't remember what show, Lee's Atty appeared and they were talking about the case and Lee's atty said something like they have to take what Casey says with a grain of salt. I could hardly believe my ears, Lee was just telling JM, deposition, how he believed everything his sister told him and now his lawyer says, on Natl TV, you have to take what she says w/ a grain of salt...did anyone else hear this ?
 
Last night, on CNN..can't remember what show, Lee's Atty appeared and they were talking about the case and Lee's atty said something like they have to take what Casey says with a grain of salt. I could hardly believe my ears, Lee was just telling JM, deposition, how he believed everything his sister told him and now his lawyer says, on Natl TV, you have to take what she says w/ a grain of salt...did anyone else hear this ?

I heard it too. I thought that was odd coming from Lee's atty. Does that mean that Lee has woken up that Casey is a big liar, or is that just the atty's opinion?
 
I heard it too. I thought that was odd coming from Lee's atty. Does that mean that Lee has woken up that Casey is a big liar, or is that just the atty's opinion?


i think lee's admitted that he knows casey lies (during the depo??) that's what made him saying that he believes everything she tells him sound even more ridiculous.
 
OK I am not going crazy, yet...here's the transcript...and my question is why would his atty do such an about face given all that Lee has said about his sister ? This part of the transcript is a little over half way down the page that is linked.

Thomas Luka, as an attorney for Lee Anthony and by extension being on the family`s side, this has got to be very difficult for them day in and day out to hear these things about Casey.

LUKA: It certainly is. And just going back a little bit, the whole Zanny the nanny or Zenaida Gonzalez, all of this has come from Casey Anthony herself. So everything has to be taken with a grain of salt and has to be verified through some third party because there have been so many inconsistencies by Miss Anthony herself.

VELEZ-MITCHELL: Yes.

LUKA: And all of these have to be explained.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0903/30/ijvm.01.html
 
The thing I have not been able to figure out from the beginning is how CA with the obvious control issues she has and her total involvement in everything to do with Caylee never once asked to meet or at least speak to the "nanny". This has bugged me from the beginning because it seems to contrary to her personality and because she did genuinely love that child I cannot imagine her (or any other Grandma with the grandchild under their roof) not insisting on it. Seems very odd to me...
 
LUKA: It certainly is. And just going back a little bit, the whole Zanny the nanny or Zenaida Gonzalez, all of this has come from Casey Anthony herself. So everything has to be taken with a grain of salt and has to be verified through some third party because there have been so many inconsistencies by Miss Anthony herself.

VELEZ-MITCHELL: Yes.

LUKA: And all of these have to be explained.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0903/30/ijvm.01.html

*resp. snipped.
thank you searchfortruth! i don't live in the US and don't get the same CNN programming that you do. i had no idea this had been said until i read your post.
 
It was my understanding that they were done before the 15th. I would think that the forensic guys who checked the computer were very highly trained professionals, and I expect they would have got it right.

KFN showed up the day after Caylee was reported missing, so the searches would have had to have been done on the 16th for them to find KFN that way.

I wonder if any computer buffs here have been able to pinpoint the date of that search?

Calling JWG to this thread.... he/she would know the answer to this question.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
506
Total visitors
676

Forum statistics

Threads
625,781
Messages
18,509,904
Members
240,845
Latest member
Bouilhol
Back
Top