This is a unique thread because no where else do we only allow one viewpoint to be discussed. We may limit parameters of discussion in other threads , but not viewpoints as long as they do not violate TOS.Just to clarify JBean, it is ok to discuss the various aspects of the evidence, right?(phone logs, forensics, witness statements, etc.) The reason many of us think she is alive is because we view the evidence in a different light than many others and I wanted to make sure we are still able to discuss our Alive theories in a logical, non-gossipy, fact based manner. This would necessarily require us to branch off in many different directions with our discussions and this might fall under your description of a general discussion. Help, please?
So, please use your best judgment as to what is "Alive" related. I know you need to discuss the evidence , but just be sure the discussion is based on Caylee Alive!
Do the best you can.
