Thought and theories on Jeremy

[DeAnn]

That's one but I was referring to this one, she tells the reporter that she needed to check first with her lawyer to find out when they can talk, then later in the video when she's asked a question she says she doesn't want to get in trouble and asks for the reporter's card.

http://www.kpho.com/story/16664445/baby-lisas-mom-says-shes-coming-home?clienttype=printable

Thanks for the link. KPHO is a Phoenix station. Here's the local Kansas City station with both interviews with Debbie Bradley and Jeremy Irwin.

http://www.kctv5.com/story/16664445/baby-lisas-mom-says-shes-coming-home

Sandra Olivas is the reporter who knocked at the door. She was very polite every time she did so. She did NOT knock on a window or do anything inappropriate. She is a real pro.

 

[redheadedgal]

So mommy gets drunk and goes to bed with the front door open, the window open AND an unsecured garage door? And she never checks on her sick baby either? And she still takes no responsibility but just says she deserves her 'adult time' whenever she needs it. :what:

yeah-- and all this happens the one evng JI isn't home??!!!

 

[SyraKelly]

here is part 2 of Megyn's interview-I hope it works for you all

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2011/10/1...-changed-their-story-over-the-past-two-weeks/

 

[Whisperer]

...we used to call this expression of JI's, "Guarded". I don't know what they call it now. I call it dead-pan. In every single interview, he's constant with the same expression. Maybe he save all movements and expressions for the bedroom. :dunno:

 

[SyraKelly]

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2011/10/1...-questions-caused-her-to-fail-polygraph-test/


hmm for some reason it won't let me post both interviews in one box-part 3

 

[hambirg]

Ok, where does JI say he checked on Lisa first - I don't think there's an interview I haven't seen now and in none of them does he say he checked on her first (before going into master). TIA

This is the first time they talked about it, in the 2nd interview. . .

JI: “When I came home from work, the front door was unlocked, most of the lights were on in the house, and the window was, in the front, was open. Obviously, all very unusual and then I started checking on the kids. Checked on the boys first, and then we checked on her, that’s when we realized she was gone.”

In the same interview DB says. . .

DB: “They were on the counter in the kitchen. And there was, uh, whenever we, we woke up, I woke up, and he came home and I was, and he said, ‘She’s not in her crib” and I said, “What do you mean she’s not in the crib?’. And I just knew, you know, something was really wrong. We’re running around the house and we’re screaming for her, and she was nowhere, and then I said, “Call 911, call 911,” and he said, “Where are the phones?’ And they weren’t on the counter where I left them, they were gone.”

I'm not sure how exactly we are suppose to interpret that.

But it doesn't quite fit. So the question is who is covering for who? :waitasec:

 

[2door73chevy]

...we used to call this expression of JI's, "Guarded". I don't know what they call it now. I call it dead-pan. In every single interview, he's constant with the same expression. Maybe he save all movements and expressions for the bedroom. :dunno:

I agree....He never changes at all.


LOL..at the bedroom comment.:floorlaugh:

 

[vlpate]

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2011/10/1...-questions-caused-her-to-fail-polygraph-test/


hmm for some reason it won't let me post both interviews in one box-part 3

Thank you! I was able to play this one (part III)....watch Jeremy in this - he doesn't answer until about the third or fourth scenario of what might have happened to Lisa:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2011/10/17/part-three-mother-of-lisa-irwin-denies-killing-or-selling-her-baby-tells-megyn-kelly-which-questions-caused-her-to-fail-polygraph-test/

 

[Whisperer]

OH..man, JI says that LE accused him within a few hours of the first interview. YET he tells the media that LE didn't need to poly him? Are you kidding me? So that whole story of it wasn't necessary to poly him can be taken off the table....grrrr. See what I mean with this stuff. You have to hear it from their own mouths.

Thanks for the 3rd interview...

 

[SyraKelly]

Thank you! I was able to play this one (part III)....watch Jeremy in this - he doesn't answer until about the third or fourth scenario of what might have happened to Lisa:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2011/10/17/part-three-mother-of-lisa-irwin-denies-killing-or-selling-her-baby-tells-megyn-kelly-which-questions-caused-her-to-fail-polygraph-test/

he just so unemotional-He is hard to read..I just don't know where his place is in all this!!

 

[jjenny]

Listening to their interviews, it's impossible to even figure out which one of them discovered baby Lisa missing. Both of them together? JI? There just all these variations of what happened when JI got home that I am very confused what do JI and DB even claim the sequence of events was.

 

[SyraKelly]

Listening to their interviews, it's impossible to even figure out which one of them discovered baby Lisa missing. Both of them together? JI? There just all these variations of what happened when JI got home that I am very confused what do JI and DB even claim the sequence of events was.

your right-and this why I don't believe them!! If they want me to believe them-then they need to tell me something that makes sense and nothing either of them say makes any sense!!!

 

[Whisperer]

All I know is they showed the public on Dr. Phil that window as possible point of entry. Jeremy was stuck on that window on the 911. They both "absolutely" said the intruder came in there. Later changing that story as "not possible"...but yet recently went back to it again on national tv.

 

[hambirg]

OH..man, JI says that LE accused him within a few hours of the first interview. YET he tells the media that LE didn't need to poly him? Are you kidding me? So that whole story of it wasn't necessary to poly him can be taken off the table....grrrr. See what I mean with this stuff. You have to hear it from their own mouths.

Thanks for the 3rd interview...

Even weirder, he says they accused him of doing something to Lisa during the two hours he was home between jobs. What does that say? :what:

Did LE not have a credible sighting of BL after JI left for the second job? :waitasec:

 

[Whisperer]

....snipped...from JI:

... I started checking on the kids. Checked on the boys first, and then we checked on her, that’s when we realized she was gone.”

Major BUST!

It is not possible that this statement was made from visual memory.

 

[norest4thewicked]

So, I have to ask this question...in light of reading the words coming out of both of their mouths, and seeing how they just contradict themselves and each other so horribly, how can anyone think that at least one of them wasn't involved? Wow...

 

[redheadedgal]

Watch Jeremy at the end of this interview. He has no problem talking about the upcoming DP show - saying everyone should watch, but when asked about Lisa, he has to go.

link please? thx!

 

[norest4thewicked]

I personally think that they are banking on the fact that they know LE won't say anything to the media/public one way or another. Because of this, they feel comfortable saying anything they want to. I watched with my own eyes how it was almost impossible to get into that window. Me thinks this might come back to bite them in the patooty!

 

[SyraKelly]

So, I have to ask this question...in light of reading the words coming out of both of their mouths, and seeing how they just contradict themselves and each other so horribly, how can anyone think that at least one of them wasn't involved? Wow...

and to me-this puts Deb in the seat-b/c all those calls were made while she was alone and Jeremy at work-then the phones calls stop and the phones are never used again when he gets home and 911 is called-JMO

 

[Whisperer]

I thought Lisa's door was open and the lights were on. Who went past the nursery and looked in on the boys first?

He never reveals how this went from I to WE...which is what you do when recalling from memory. He isn't recalling from his memory and that statement proves it. He is giving an explanation but it is not from his vision of actions. This is not the order that it occurred and most likely not the truth.