Hi Emeralgem...I was just wondering what you thought about the comment that Mark Nejme made while Mike Brooks was filling in for NG not too long ago? In case you missed it it was this night here :
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0910/16/ng.01.html
snip~
MARK NEJAME, ATTORNEY FOR TIM MILLER, TEXAS EQUUSEARCH: Quite the opposite. Tim just found his 102nd victim yesterday. This man`s life is dedicated to finding the lost and the deceased when nobody else would do it. He didn`t care. He was doing something unorthodox.
Without question, he was looking to find this child. As far as the publicity seeking, nobody knew he was doing it. Where is the publicity? He did it for one reason and one reason only. Because he wanted to help find this child. So anybody that claims otherwise, they really don`t know what they`re talking about.
BROOKS: Now has Tim talked to you about Ronald and possibly, you know, him having the gun?
NEJAME: Sure. In fact, we were with Ronald and we spent time. And the one thing I can tell you, I genuinely believe that Ronald absolutely does not know what happened to his child and is dedicated to finding the child.
BROOKS: Yes, I do, too.
NEJAME: His manners and the way he acts, a lot of people may not accept it. But I believe he`s totally committed. And the issue as it relates to Misty, if I could refer to what was just being discussed.
BROOKS: Sure.
NEJAME: Ron believes, in my opinion from the time that I`d spent, that Misty might have known something about it. And if she ended up going elsewhere with other family and she was gone, he believes he would have lost that single opportunity or the best opportunity to best find out what happened to his child.
So all the psychological gibber jives that I`ve just heard, respectfully, it`s not that complicated. He knew that his best chance of finding his child was keeping her close by. Because he`s got questions like everybody else does about her continued discrepancies. ~ end snip
I know your opinion is that Tim Miller might suspect Ronald of wrong doing, and I just wondered what your take on Mark NeJame's comments were? TIA