elle1919
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Messages
- 5,354
- Reaction score
- 23
I agree that the case needs all the eyes anyone can get on it. Tim and TES, Ron's PI, everybody is welcome to look for Haleigh as far as I'm concerned.
I'm just saying that to clear someone of all involvement in a crime it is not always enough to have an alibi. There are other ways of being an accomplice, such as taking part in the planning or soliciting assistance to do the crime, helping out in the cover-up afterwards etc.. Suppose this is a family operation to get some donation money or revenge against the other parent or a hoax to cover up a negligent accident or something. How would you go about proving which people had no hand in planning it?
How would LE show that Crystal never had a conversation with anyone in which she asked them to abduct Haleigh? How would LE prove that Ron told no one that he'd be working late on Monday evening and Misty would be knocked out and the back door would be left unlocked on purpose and it would be a good time to take Haleigh now?
It is very hard to prove a negative and clear anyone 100 % if you don't know who did which crime when and why and who all might have wanted it to happen or known about it. Which is why I think the judicial system is more concerned about getting proof that someone DID something than clearing people. The former can convict people, ruling others out just aids the investigation by helping it focus on the right path.
It would be reassuring and good for the reputation of everyone involved to get LE to clear them 100% if they can't be involved in any way, but I'm not sure it'll happen until it's known which kind of crime this is.
Good Morning Donjeta. What crime are you talking about in your post? Is Law Enforcement investigating a missing child case or a murder investigation? I really must refer to a document that I found extremely helpful when researching facts and protocols in missing children cases.
http://www.klaaskids.org/pg-mc-lawenforcement.htm
snip~These 1988 statistics illustrate the low priority given to missing child cases: they are old and questionable and a promised update has yet to be published despite the fact that twelve years have passed. An overall lack of knowledge, training and preparedness exists on the issue at most levels, including law enforcement. Formal kidnap protocols are not widely distributed among law enforcement agencies and most agencies have little or no experience investigating non-family or predatory abductions. So, if one occurs in your community, your local law enforcement agency might be ill prepared to investigate the case.~end snip
One thing is for sure, Haleigh is gone. Perhaps I am all alone in my thinking and I really don't mind. I am not impressed with Law Enforcement in this case and rather than list, again, actions that I find inappropriate, I will instead say that I think it is time for a set of guidelines to be developed on a federal level that are to be followed by Law Enforcement agencies who are investigating a missing child case. Not a murder case, a missing child case. Perhaps even some guidelines that family members must follow when their child goes missing. 1988 was a long time ago and it is time to get some standards in place that will protect our nations children.