The wife of the OceanGate CEO who was piloting the submersible that disappeared during its voyage to the Titanic wreckage is related to a first-class couple that perished the night the famous ship sank in 1912.
1600 ft off the bow of the Titanic.So does that mean above or next to?
That’s a shame.If you mean were the passengers able to see the Titanic before the implosion, napkin math tells me it was a couple of football fields away … and I assume (but don’t know) that the sub’s lighting wasn’t strong enough for that, just for a start.
The debris was found on the ocean floor. Don’t have a source handy, definitely read it, I think that came from the coast guard.
I recommend reading about Robert Ballard and how he discovered and filmed the Titanic and other ship wrecks, and the things that happened after his finding.I’d like to learn about those other vessels. I really didn’t understand much of anything about this prior to this tragedy.
I think you might have misread me, I said essentially it COULD have been worse, thank goodness they weren't trapped down there for days alive, when that kid would have rather been anywhere else.Do we know they were trapped down there for days, alive? I was under the impression the implosion happened when they reached the depth of the Titanic.
In all probability they were dead before they knew anything had gone wrong, which can be considered a blessing. The implosion would have been loud compared to the normal background noise of the ocean, but it probably wouldn't be loud enough to be heard at the surface without specialist equipment.I do not know much about subs or pressure, but have any of the experts or people on here said if the passengers would have been aware that they were about to face a catastrophic failure moments before the implosion? And if the implosion would have been "very loud," wouldn't the Mothership have heard it when it happened? Especially if it happened in the mid-depth water column; not at the very bottom?
I've defended some aspects of Titan's design, but one thing I'll never defend is the tubular shape of the pressure hull, which I can only think was done to fit more paying "crew members" on board.
Normally subs designed for this kind of depth use a perfectly spherical pressure hull. The sphere is inherently much stronger than other shapes because the force applies equally in all directions; there's no inherent weak spot. Spherical hulls have been used successfully on pretty much all previous deep sea vessels, and up to now none of them have had a catastrophic failure.
IMO, by making Titan's pressure hull tubular, it was always going to be much weaker than it should have been.
Whoa. Thanks!!I know he designed and built a submersible.
Here's an article from 2012
Mr Cameron has spent the past few years working in secret with his team of engineers to design and build the craft, which weighs 11 tonnes and is more than 7m (23ft) long.
He describes it as a "vertical torpedo" that slices through the water allowing him a speedy descent.
![]()
James Cameron back on surface after deepest ocean dive
Film director James Cameron returns to the surface after becoming the first person in 50 years to reach the deepest point in the ocean, the Mariana Trench.www.bbc.com
ETA: And, here's more info on his "Deep Sea Challenge"
![]()
James Cameron - DEEPSEA CHALLENGE Team
Expedition Leader, Submersible Co-designer, and Pilot Born in Canada, James Cameron moved to California in 1971 at the age of 17. He studied physics at Fullerton Junior College while working as a machinist, and later a truck driver. Setting his sights on a career in film, Cameron quit his...www.deepseachallenge.com
And, I posted this video previously...
In all probability they were dead before they knew anything had gone wrong, which can be considered a blessing. The implosion would have been loud compared to the normal background noise of the ocean, but it probably wouldn't be loud enough to be heard at the surface without specialist equipment.
If anyone has seen the movie Raise the Titanic, a submersible implodes in that movie. They show water rushing in as the crew battle to save the sub at about 11,000ft. Totally unrealistic. In reality, even a slight leak would cause water to rush in at 6000psi, slicing through like a jet cutter. The inrush of water would be so sudden and ferocious that the occupants of the vessel would almost certainly never know it had happened.
Just about everyone can visualize an explosion and the damage it does, because explosions are common. An implosion is the same thing in reverse. Just as sudden, just as destructive, but instead of everything expanding outwards it's crushed inwards.
I've found this a difficult one to process and rationalise.
Really? Why? Air travel is a necessity in modern life. Travelling to the depths of the ocean is a luxury that taxpayers need not fund IMO.I think there's probably a lot of important or scientific and engineering data that can be gleaned from this crash by analyzing the surviving wreckage.
Just as the NTSB does post-crash investigations which make air travel safer, I hope one good thing to come out of this will be that the knowledge gained will help build better, safer DSVs.
Dr. Ballard/Woods Hole was the first with Alvin. to be fair Cameron was making a movie.Whoa. Thanks!!
Yes, I believe the admiral mentioned something about within the water column.I think from what's been said it imploded some distance above and to the side of the original wreck, but I've also seen it said somewhere that it may have descended too quickly and impacted the sea floor. At this stage, I think it more likely it imploded some distance above the wreck because of the time they lost communications.
MOO