kiki the parrot
Former Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 4,481
- Reaction score
- 11
Kinda doubt this witness would wanna have defendant move in nextdoor to her either
Sorry, there's not enough $ in the world...
arrot:


On cross dna witness conceding that, w/out differentiating, source of contributing dna could be from epithelial--skin cells--from any manner of handling panties. Emphasizing not necessarily the result of sperm of two males, could be from any sort of skin cells etc.
arrot:
The fact that Davidson's DNA wasn't on her panties works much more against him, since it shows that she didn't put them on under her jeans. She would have if they had had consensual sex.
I sure wish I could be looking at this case through the eyes of the jury. IIRC there is a lawyer on the jury, hopefully he can get the other to see what they are not seeing in this picture. I just pray that Davidson gets the DP of all the accused I pray a lest he gets it for the parents sake.
Usually, I just don't care about defense attorneys. They might be annoying or amusing, but these two are hideous, and I find myself actually despising them. In stead of trying to get a fair trial for their defendants, they are trying to get him off at any cost. That is not truth. That is not justice. That should NOT BE the American way. If these animals gets the other animal off, they should be forced to move him in next door to them and their families. These guys may be for themselves and for their own agrandizement, but they aren't fair or just. They don't stand for human rights, because they abuse the human rights of others to stand for the human rights of this sleezoid by inuendo slimey implication. IMO, all of the men sitting at the defense table are hideous creatures!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.