Are you local in Nashville? Just curious where you get your daily news?I see news media covering this case almost every night, or at least every other night. They haven't moved on. They are still wondering why the manifesto is being hidden.
Are you local in Nashville? Just curious where you get your daily news?I see news media covering this case almost every night, or at least every other night. They haven't moved on. They are still wondering why the manifesto is being hidden.
Not local in Nashville.Are you local in Nashville? Just curious where you get your daily news?
Not local in Nashville.
National news on cable network, MSM.
I only meant that her punishment as a result of her crimes has already been meted out. I do agree with the rest of your post 100%.I agree with most of your post, except that I don't believe that justice has already been dispatched. The victims and their families deserve justice. To know why their lives were taken, why they were hunted down and slaughtered as they studied in their church school.
I don't know how Fox usually deals with criminal manifestos so I can't speak to that, but what I find interesting is how so many people just want others to hush up, move along, and stop caring about this manifesto. That part to me is just weird. Moreover, it's like a slap in the face to the families of the victims.I have seen it being covered on Fox News only. I find it interesting that this is the one manifesto that they are so interested in.
In the general public, however, the Rasmussen poll shows that 68% of Americans surveyed want the manifesto released, so those who want to cover up the manifesto are in the minority.I don't know how Fox usually deals with criminal manifestos so I can't speak to that, but what I find interesting is how so many people just want others to hush up, move along, and stop caring about this manifesto. That part to me is just weird. Moreover, it's like a slap in the face to the families of the victims.
There have been forty (40) mass shootings since March 27th. IMHO not caring about those would be a slap in the face to their families, too.I don't know how Fox usually deals with criminal manifestos so I can't speak to that, but what I find interesting is how so many people just want others to hush up, move along, and stop caring about this manifesto. That part to me is just weird. Moreover, it's like a slap in the face to the families of the victims.
I'll continue to rely on the judgment of LE to decide whether the writings are released.In the general public, however, the Rasmussen poll shows that 68% of Americans surveyed want the manifesto released, so those who want to cover up the manifesto are in the minority.
Thanks for this link.There have been forty (40) mass shootings since March 27th. IMHO not caring about those would be a slap in the face to their families, too.
We haven't stopped caring about the children/families of Sandy Hook, or Uvalde despite new shootings occurring every day which also need to be investigated.
It's like drinking from a firehose to track daily shootings in our country.
We have heard and seen all kinds of differing information about what is included in the “manifesto”.I'm sure we all know, this is exactly what many people are already thinking.
From journalists to politicians to random folks on social media, this is exactly what folks are saying because of the way it's being handled.
Do you mean the gender identity?We have heard and seen all kinds of differing information about what is included in the “manifesto”.
So we have contradictory info about what’s in it and a plethora of differing reasons why the manifesto should not be released.
The reasoning in the above mentioned article regarding the possibly that they are being sensitive to a protected class rings hollow to me. This is Tennessee. Not Massachusetts or California for instance.
Imo there has been an “elephant in the room” in this case from near the beginning. It’s possible that the writings are very specific about that elephant in the room - and authorities are working to keep that “elephant” info out of the public arena.
Just my own sense imo
Not specifically no. It has not really been touched upon if at all in msm that i can recall. So if it’s not discussed in msm it’s not discussed here. Taboo. Hence “Elephant in the Room”. Just my opinionDo you mean the gender identity?
I understand, thank you.Not specifically no. It has not really been touched upon if at all in msm that i can recall. So if it’s not discussed in msm it’s not discussed here. Taboo. Hence “Elephant in the Room”. Just my opinion
BBM. I agree. I wonder if the investigation is still ongoing to see if the shooter acted alone or had some kind of "help"We have heard and seen all kinds of differing information about what is included in the “manifesto”.
So we have contradictory info about what’s in it and a plethora of differing reasons why the manifesto should not be released.
The reasoning in the above mentioned article regarding the possibly that they are being sensitive to a protected class rings hollow to me. This is Tennessee. Not Massachusetts or California for instance.
Imo there has been an “elephant in the room” in this case from near the beginning. It’s possible that the writings are very specific about that elephant in the room - and authorities are working to keep that “elephant” info out of the public arena.
Just my own sense imo
Don't you think the the Victims' families deserve to know why?I'll continue to rely on the judgment of LE to decide whether the writings are released.
For example, if the shooter listed specific names of people she wanted to target, some other deranged person may decide to act. The Kentucky shooting so quickly after the Nashville shooting proves mental illness is a very serious problem in this country.
I've not seen one victim's family say publicly they want to know the mental health ramblings of the person who killed their loved one.Don't you think the the Victims' families deserve to know why?
The families could also read the writings privately if they so wish and are granted access, it does not necessitate that the information also needs to be shared publicly.I've not seen one victim's family say publicly they want to know the mental health ramblings of the person who killed their loved one.
Sure, if they want to, that is.Don't you think the the Victims' families deserve to know why?