Today's Court Hearing 2PM ET

  • #261
Baez sent a subpoena duces tecum to Amscot, but SA can't tell if they got it.
 
  • #262
now talking about defendent's motion to preserve evidence..
 
  • #263
defense motion to preserve evidence, is it not the same motion previously heard? Yes it is says defense counsel
 
  • #264
Subpoena duces tecum means "you show up and you bring documents"

Didn't get Notice means that notice they were served, I assume.
 
  • #265
JB team talking about "parsing" . SA says they have no control over what happens in the hands of Oakridge or FBI..
 
  • #266
oops, defense failed to notice fed authorities on motion to preserve evidence bc it deals with fed agencies, etc. that state has no control over
 
  • #267
Apparently for the rest the defense did not notice the proper parties!
 
  • #268
Judge says the "tone" of JB team lawyer is not appreciated. Don't speak to the SA, but address the court appropriately.
 
  • #269
Strickland says "tone here starting to bother me, speak to the court"
 
  • #270
Baez's counsel is saying "If you have information you need to turn it over." I think the SA is arguing the proper parties were not notified.
 
  • #271
Team JB says they aren't getting info in timely manner and the trial is fast approaching.
 
  • #272
I'm sorry but didn't Judge in last set of hrgs and motions to preserve evidence, exchange evidence say that stuff had to be provided within x days?
 
  • #273
I think they needed to get some of these docs "from the sources" and since they didn't go about it properly they just want the State to turn it over.
 
  • #274
I'm sorry but didn't Judge in last set of hrgs and motions to preserve evidence, exchange evidence say that stuff had to be provided within x days?

Yeah, but it is up to the defense to ask for it from each agency in a proper manner. I think that's what the problem is...
 
  • #275
The defense have to "give notice" and I don't know if they did that.
 
  • #276
oh geez. The defense isn't even arguing the right motion that is being talked about by SA and judge right now.
 
  • #277
the order on this motion had to do with notification of testing... defense is talking about documents being received. everyone is confused.
 
  • #278
Prosecution saying FBI has there own protocol and they may not allow someone to be present at testing.
 
  • #279
Kinda boring...trying to catch up...any major decisions thus far?
 
  • #280
now talking about motion to compel K9 info
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
1,209
Total visitors
1,349

Forum statistics

Threads
632,401
Messages
18,625,946
Members
243,136
Latest member
sluethsrus123
Back
Top