Theonly1 New Member Joined Aug 24, 2008 Messages 2,431 Reaction score 21 Nov 25, 2008 #261 Baez sent a subpoena duces tecum to Amscot, but SA can't tell if they got it.
FloridaKatz Former Member Joined Aug 4, 2008 Messages 1,586 Reaction score 1 Nov 25, 2008 #262 now talking about defendent's motion to preserve evidence..
B bobodedoo New Member Joined Aug 8, 2008 Messages 275 Reaction score 0 Nov 25, 2008 #263 defense motion to preserve evidence, is it not the same motion previously heard? Yes it is says defense counsel
defense motion to preserve evidence, is it not the same motion previously heard? Yes it is says defense counsel
Theonly1 New Member Joined Aug 24, 2008 Messages 2,431 Reaction score 21 Nov 25, 2008 #264 Subpoena duces tecum means "you show up and you bring documents" Didn't get Notice means that notice they were served, I assume.
Subpoena duces tecum means "you show up and you bring documents" Didn't get Notice means that notice they were served, I assume.
FloridaKatz Former Member Joined Aug 4, 2008 Messages 1,586 Reaction score 1 Nov 25, 2008 #265 JB team talking about "parsing" . SA says they have no control over what happens in the hands of Oakridge or FBI..
JB team talking about "parsing" . SA says they have no control over what happens in the hands of Oakridge or FBI..
B bobodedoo New Member Joined Aug 8, 2008 Messages 275 Reaction score 0 Nov 25, 2008 #266 oops, defense failed to notice fed authorities on motion to preserve evidence bc it deals with fed agencies, etc. that state has no control over
oops, defense failed to notice fed authorities on motion to preserve evidence bc it deals with fed agencies, etc. that state has no control over
Theonly1 New Member Joined Aug 24, 2008 Messages 2,431 Reaction score 21 Nov 25, 2008 #267 Apparently for the rest the defense did not notice the proper parties!
FloridaKatz Former Member Joined Aug 4, 2008 Messages 1,586 Reaction score 1 Nov 25, 2008 #268 Judge says the "tone" of JB team lawyer is not appreciated. Don't speak to the SA, but address the court appropriately.
Judge says the "tone" of JB team lawyer is not appreciated. Don't speak to the SA, but address the court appropriately.
curiositycat The one thing that doesn't abide by majority rule Joined Feb 1, 2006 Messages 4,948 Reaction score 12 Website helpforstrugglingchristians.wordpress.com Nov 25, 2008 #269 Strickland says "tone here starting to bother me, speak to the court"
Theonly1 New Member Joined Aug 24, 2008 Messages 2,431 Reaction score 21 Nov 25, 2008 #270 Baez's counsel is saying "If you have information you need to turn it over." I think the SA is arguing the proper parties were not notified.
Baez's counsel is saying "If you have information you need to turn it over." I think the SA is arguing the proper parties were not notified.
FloridaKatz Former Member Joined Aug 4, 2008 Messages 1,586 Reaction score 1 Nov 25, 2008 #271 Team JB says they aren't getting info in timely manner and the trial is fast approaching.
B bobodedoo New Member Joined Aug 8, 2008 Messages 275 Reaction score 0 Nov 25, 2008 #272 I'm sorry but didn't Judge in last set of hrgs and motions to preserve evidence, exchange evidence say that stuff had to be provided within x days?
I'm sorry but didn't Judge in last set of hrgs and motions to preserve evidence, exchange evidence say that stuff had to be provided within x days?
Theonly1 New Member Joined Aug 24, 2008 Messages 2,431 Reaction score 21 Nov 25, 2008 #273 I think they needed to get some of these docs "from the sources" and since they didn't go about it properly they just want the State to turn it over.
I think they needed to get some of these docs "from the sources" and since they didn't go about it properly they just want the State to turn it over.
Theonly1 New Member Joined Aug 24, 2008 Messages 2,431 Reaction score 21 Nov 25, 2008 #274 bobodedoo said: I'm sorry but didn't Judge in last set of hrgs and motions to preserve evidence, exchange evidence say that stuff had to be provided within x days? Click to expand... Yeah, but it is up to the defense to ask for it from each agency in a proper manner. I think that's what the problem is...
bobodedoo said: I'm sorry but didn't Judge in last set of hrgs and motions to preserve evidence, exchange evidence say that stuff had to be provided within x days? Click to expand... Yeah, but it is up to the defense to ask for it from each agency in a proper manner. I think that's what the problem is...
Theonly1 New Member Joined Aug 24, 2008 Messages 2,431 Reaction score 21 Nov 25, 2008 #275 The defense have to "give notice" and I don't know if they did that.
FloridaKatz Former Member Joined Aug 4, 2008 Messages 1,586 Reaction score 1 Nov 25, 2008 #276 oh geez. The defense isn't even arguing the right motion that is being talked about by SA and judge right now.
oh geez. The defense isn't even arguing the right motion that is being talked about by SA and judge right now.
A absolut_alexis Active Member Joined Mar 9, 2005 Messages 417 Reaction score 65 Nov 25, 2008 #277 the order on this motion had to do with notification of testing... defense is talking about documents being received. everyone is confused.
the order on this motion had to do with notification of testing... defense is talking about documents being received. everyone is confused.
curiositycat The one thing that doesn't abide by majority rule Joined Feb 1, 2006 Messages 4,948 Reaction score 12 Website helpforstrugglingchristians.wordpress.com Nov 25, 2008 #278 Prosecution saying FBI has there own protocol and they may not allow someone to be present at testing.
Prosecution saying FBI has there own protocol and they may not allow someone to be present at testing.
Pattymarie Active Member Joined Oct 31, 2008 Messages 2,102 Reaction score 0 Nov 25, 2008 #279 Kinda boring...trying to catch up...any major decisions thus far?
FloridaKatz Former Member Joined Aug 4, 2008 Messages 1,586 Reaction score 1 Nov 25, 2008 #280 now talking about motion to compel K9 info