trial day 32: the defense continues it's case in chief #91

[Steely Dan]

They may have sent out a bulletin, but just like articles I didn't pay attention to it.

 

[josie1986]

Now that hes explained this Juan can expand and tear it apart yeahhh!!

So this complaint was dismissed is that right?

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

 

[LotusPawprint]

What is a "diplomate"?

 

[leebee52]

OMG...he's a DIPLO_MATE

 

[ScarlettScarpetta]

I unplugged, I can not take him anymore. Nothing he has to say is important to the crime. Only why she says she can not remember. It does not change the fact that she butchered him. I don't care why she can't remember..

Although I believe she does remember and remember well.

 

[norest4thewicked]

WHAT is wrong with Jodi's face? She looks more upset hearing about Dr. Samuel's problem than she did looking at the crime scene photos!!!

 

[4Jacy]

I am glad THEY are bringing up the ethics violation---now Juan won't look petty when he goes into it deeper.

This Dr. didn't even talk to the mother in a custody case--he just came out in favor of the
father, unfairly---so he could get free dental work done. That is highly unethical.

I am so angry with the DT. The should have throughly vetted Samuels before he took up all of our time with his nonsense. :banghead:

However, it works well for the State. :great:

 

[3trees]

Unbenounced to you? You're licensed in the State, it is YOUR responsibility to KNOW what the rules were.

No one sent him a summary or the Cliff Notes of the law.

 

[adb263]

Unbeknownst to me!! That covers a LOT of territory!

maybe he has amnesia!!


This case has taken a turn down the rabbit hole!!

 

[ctmom]

Check out that pooooopie face

 

[spcagrl]

I had the Internet in 1995 and 1996. I know they had it in New Jersey too.

 

[snowcat]

it;s taking him as long to explain away his own ethical violation as explaining away Jodi's murder/fognesia

 

[Southern_Meadow]

The complaint and disciplinary action against him is really not a big deal IMO and Wilmott is doing the right thing by getting this out there on direct.

I would imagine it is true that there are an unusually large number of complaints filed related to custody evaluations (which is probably why it's hard to find custody evaluators these days).

On its face it does appear that in that one case it might tend to show bias towards the father, but I bet if we knew the underlying facts of the case there was probably plenty of evidence to support his custody evaluation for the father. Based on experience I would also bet the mother who filed the complaint was personality disordered -- that's who typically files complaints when they lose.

He should have kept everything above board, but it does not mean his custody evaluation was flawed. JMO

Sorry, but it all sounds hinky and off to me. JW can bring it up all she wants, but it still sounds bad. IMO.

 

[katiewonders]

Blah blah blah. He can say what he wants, but I can't imagine him being fined if he were innocent in that situation.

I dunno, I don't see anything wrong with bartering services, I don't know what New Jersey didn't allow it.

 

[Truth Detector]

JA looks like she's ready to bust out bawling...

 

[Candy_Pickletoes]

It just didn't pay.

Say no more, doctor.

 

[Pink Panther]

Well, she's probably going to make another complaint after all he said...

 

[Rosemary Pierce]

Throwing some other psychiatrist under the bus...Unbelievable!

 

[laniefi]

Polishing.a.TURD

 

[VALee]

so wait, he was doing custody evals, then quit doing them cause they do not pay? hmmm.