trial day 36: the defense continues its case in chief #106

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #81
Thank you! You put it much better then I could. :cheer: Same with the poster you quoted.

So she deserves nasty names like "FemiNazi" because she is testifying for the defense?

Okay. Cool. Thx.
 
  • #82
No, he hasn't. But isn't this something that would have come out in the state's CIC, as part of the forensics evidence?

I was reading the other day that they will not like to use chemical testing on ammunition because it is a flawed practice. It also takes a long time, and Jodi had only been in custody, what, a few hours?

It was a bluff.

I think Det. Flores was only saying the brand of the ammo was the same as the casing in Travis' bathroom. I didn't get the idea he was saying it had gone thru forensic testing. But, I do believe he was being truthful about this particular issue because if he bluffed her at this point, and she knew for a fact he was bluffing, he would have no chance of getting the truth out of her in the future. She would just continue to treat him like a mushroom (keep him in the dark and feed him bull$h!t.)
 
  • #83
FWIW, I was appalled by the ridiculing of Dr. Samuels' physical appearance.

I think that sort of mean, pointless and childish crap has no place here. We are supposedly above that.

Name calling is the crutch of the desparate and defeated. Is that who we are?

Agreed. I didn't participate, or laugh. I also don't think it's cool to make fun of Nurmi's weight or Wilmotts hair/clothing.
 
  • #84
Thank you! You put it much better then I could. :cheer: Same with the poster you quoted.

As NG also pointed out, she plugged her book today. I just heard it twive in about less than a minute.

I don't care what color/gender/species you are. If you are testifying for someone after you have seen the photos, video, and testimony that show her guilt, then you are guilty of selling out for your own profit/gain.
 
  • #85
BBM I did not think it was funny and I would bet alot of WS members did not think it was funny to make fun of Dr. Samuels. Maybe not so much hypocrisy here as you might think.

I think anything that makes fun of people that has nothing to do with their character, etc. is just low and petty. Like Jodi's body parts, her appearance, Samuels' appearance, Nurmi's appearance, etc.

It's just mean spirited. I have brought this up before.
 
  • #86
No, he hasn't. But isn't this something that would have come out in the state's CIC, as part of the forensics evidence?

I was reading the other day that they will not like to use chemical testing on ammunition because it is a flawed practice. It also takes a long time, and Jodi had only been in custody, what, a few hours?

It was a bluff.

I don't think he was going by chemical testing, more like comparing the brands.

There have been many things that have not come out during the state's case that boggles the mind. From the tire slashing as witnessed by Linda to that former prosecution witness who told the story about how Jodi confronted her in the bathroom.
 
  • #87
I think that photo of Travis in the pin striped suit at home is the same suit he wore the night he met Jodi, I wonder, was he trying on the suit at home just after he bought it, before travelling to Vegas?
 
  • #88
Yes and it was shaking and traumatized by the experience. Probably starved, dehydrated, terrified. Having spent years volunteering at shelters and fostering abandoned and abused cats , I have seen things that have brought me to my knees. I have a real problem with this. People who abuse animals are sadists., end of story. I am "speculating" that there is so much more we have not heard about her violence and disregard for all beings imo

OMG that brings tears to my eyes. She is so sick :furious:
 
  • #89
He has bluffed that the neighbors saw her there, too. Even though no one did.

That's a more believable bluff. The one about the bullets isn't. I still think there may be something to it.
 
  • #90
And, for me my favoritie day his last day of cross, replaying those 48 hour clips over and over of her lying ,manipulative self - setting her up.

Yeah - he knows what he is doing.:great:

I hope he plays those 48 hrs clip in the closing argument over and over...again!! :please:
 
  • #91
BBM I did not think it was funny and I would bet alot of WS members did not think it was funny to make fun of Dr. Samuels. Maybe not so much hypocrisy here as you might think.

Not only wasn't it funny, but the Mods posted to stop making up nicknames for people although nobody actually stopped.

Taking issue with his testimony or his credibility is one thing. Calling him fat, ugly, greasy, etc. is just nasty.
 
  • #92
  • #93
Her story to Flores was that she owned a feral cat. She was just trying to get him off the subject, as she does throughout her entire interview.

the other cat story came from her co-worker he told about Jodi taking care of someones cat for 2 weeks. By taking care, she meant Jodi admitted to leaving it in a room with a bit of food and water and ignoring it until 2 weeks later.
 
  • #94
I think that photo of Travis in the pin striped suit at home is the same suit he wore the night he met Jodi, I wonder, was he trying on the suit at home just after he bought it, before travelling to Vegas?

Except Jodi took those pics, IIRC.
 
  • #95
So we are to believe television is real life now? Even reality shows are scripted.

Do not disparage Law & Order. It is sacred television...like Gunsmoke and The Brady Bunch.
 
  • #96
Interesting discussion on Dr Drew, on how his childhood left scars which allowed him to be sucked in by Jodi. That's like another level of sadness in this case.
 
  • #97
I don't think he was going by chemical testing, more like comparing the brands.

There have been many things that have not come out during the state's case that boggles the mind. From the tire slashing as witnessed by Linda to that former prosecution witness who told the story about how Jodi confronted her in the bathroom.

That's possible, but I don't see how it would help the prosecution that much since the same brand is probably sold at a lot of places. In any case, it was probably still just a bluff since how could the tell what brand an empty shell is? I again think this is something that would have come out during the forensics-centric CIC.

The tire slashing hasn't come in because it wasn't proven who did it. The story about her in the bathroom may have been torn apart because the woman was drunk and may also be prejudicial. There's no telling but I don't think it's needed.
 
  • #98
Am i wrong? I thought no one saw the tires being slashed, only that they had been slashed.
 
  • #99
I have tried to keep up, impossible. What in the world is JA rolling her eyes for? This is her star witness. It's about 54:37 in this video. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jU5ooZH3yxs"]Jodi Arias Trial - Day 36 - Part 4 - YouTube[/ame]
 
  • #100
So she deserves nasty names like "FemiNazi" because she is testifying for the defense?

Okay. Cool. Thx.

No, and I deleted my post that said that, I was "quoting" from the post I quoted and apologize for that. I've never even heard that used before
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
50
Guests online
2,057
Total visitors
2,107

Forum statistics

Threads
632,104
Messages
18,622,025
Members
243,019
Latest member
22kimba22
Back
Top