pufnstuf
"Yes, she's emotionally disturbed. She's unbalance
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 3,329
- Reaction score
- 29
Yes I would feel better with someone else
Well, Travis' family adores him, and, really, that's all that matters, isn't it?
Yes I would feel better with someone else
1) Unicorn handler
2) Tootsie Pop chef
3) Romance Novel Editor
4) Do-it-yourself-home-finger-repair Expert
5) Ninja Instructor
6) Vampire Hunter
7) Bad-presson-lettering-T-Shirt Kit Manufacturer
8) Spiderman
9) JA's Investment Portfolio Manager
10) Simon Cowell
Yeah, I thought they were seriously unfair with him today. He started out very calm with her today and she got testy with him RIGHT away. That's when the gloves came off. And she just would not answer a question. The only reason the Snow White questioning got off track was she wouldn't answer honestly. I thought it was brilliant.
Can you imagine how frustrated TA had to have been with all the stuff JA had done and was doing to him? I applaud him for not clockin her proper. I do believe he banged his head against the doorway....who the heck wouldn't? I bet she drove him bat stick crazy. And yet, he never put a hand on her. We know he didn't. And that tells you what kind of man he was (is). He had a healthy sex drive and overactive hormones. He won the bedroom lottery...so what? I don't think he ever imagined she was this evil, even in that rant to her. He saw a glimpse but he never imagined how truly evil she is.
And she forgot the porcelain angel that Travis gave her for helping him put boxes in his attic.
Always something to return for. No matter day or night,
Thanks mods..rough night.....
we appreciate everything though! :loveyou:
I think it is interesting that for 8 days we listened to ALV rattle on about JA and all her behaviours that led to her being in an abusive relantionship. Then it comes to the murder of JA and she spends 10 minutes and for all intents and purposes she just repeats JA's story.
Now what I wonder is why didn't JW have her testify about what happened after the murder of TA. What about her going to the home of another man and taking part in another sexual encounter with an actual total stranger.
Why didn't she have an opinion on that. Is that part of an abused woman's behaviour? Or a Black Widow? jmo
I like him but his nose looks like a ....well....you know what it looks like. And I can't seem to get past that when he starts talking. He's all blah blah blah blah and I'm all wow, I have no idea what he's saying because his nose looks like a p****.
I know. I have horrible thoughts. :slap:
1) Unicorn handler
2) Tootsie Pop chef
3) Romance Novel Editor
4) Do-it-yourself-home-finger-repair Expert
5) Ninja Instructor
6) Vampire Hunter
7) Bad-presson-lettering-T-Shirt Kit Manufacturer
8) Spiderman
9) JA's Investment Portfolio Manager
10) Simon Cowell
And he was a GROWN man who could have ended it, sex is not an excuse to continue with someone, especially one you think is crazy. He was raised in a horrible environment (in his younger years) per what has been said and most people raised in that type of environment tend to became hypervigilant to their surroundings and the people in their live. So based on his past live, per what has been said, I feel he would have been more in tune to crazy individuals. Not a good idea to use sex as an excuse when dealing with unsafe individuals...JMO
So how does Simon fit in?
I'm glad that you're giving voice to an unpopular opinion. I agree with you that the text messages, emails, etc. show evidence of emotional and verbal abuse toward Jodi. Even if Travis had a good reason to be angry with her, he was very ready and able to be cruel. His words dehumanized her more than they expressed his own feelings of betrayal, pain, and anger. The words he wrote were meant to not only to reject her--which was his right--but to annihilate her completely.
Why is this so hard to accept, even with the proof in black and white? Why do people seem to think that acknowledging the truth of Travis' emotional violence automatically means excusing Jodi's exteme violence? It doesn't and it won't. She killed a man, and it doesn't look at all like she did it in self defense. But, if Jodi is a sick woman who got sicker because of this relationship, this is something that has to be heard. The truth still matters. Hatred for the liar, the killer, however natural that may be, can't negate the evidence. And, yes, even the fact that she did the worst thing possible can't negate the evidence. It is a deliberate act of intellectual dishonesty to allow hatred to blot out facts.
Take Jodi out of the equation, and what we're left with here is a lot of people saying that the only "real" abuse there is is the kind that leaves physical marks; the rest, though equally damaging, is being minimized or denied. People say that Jodi herself is insulting victims of intimate partner violence, but I see the insult happening right here, on these boards.
He's not on trial.
I think her operation was on the other side and higher up, KWIM? :what: But you're right, she needs a tuneup there too. One side's a bit, uhm, deflated.![]()
Huh. Well I guess if you had a murdered loved one and you wanted a better court experience for yourself (since you don't like Juan Martinez' style), you would feel better with someone else.
If I had a murdered loved one, I would get on my knees every night thanking God that I had someone like Juan Martinez as my prosecutor. Why? He gets convictions. He doesn't deal with defense pleas for a lesser charge. He knows the ins and outs of the case--intimately. I would want the animal who murdered my loved one to get the harshest sentence. And I would be grateful for the caring way he treats the victim's family. But that's just me.
MOO
Number 10 would be very interesting to witness!
This makes me ill. I reiterate that these bumpkins that think they're at the county fair need to be removed from the courtroom...permanently. I think they are purposely trying to be disruptive to the State's case, and I don't understand why there aren't court officials addressing it.
Someone needs to point out all of the ridiculous things going on in this courtroom to the people that should be looking after such things. Seriously, passing notes, coaching witnesses from the sidelines, mitigation specialist courting the defendant in full view of the jury, former felon turned BFF of the defendant derailing this trial, and defense attorneys being openly HOSTILE with the prosecution (pizzy would be a better word), AND lord love us....the endless rounds of "may we approach".
I'm starting to think this trial won't be over before the 4th of July. Or if Nurmi gets back up there.....maybe Labor Day.