Posting as a newcomer here! Reading your insights and perspectives are Juanderful! Here's my take on something that stood out for me at the end of JW's rebuttal today...AVL said she rejected cases that "didn't have enough evidence/information", "didn't believe the person (check all for JA), yet she DID take JA, and she apologized to JA for "invading" her privacy" , which included finding documentation of JA being a controlling stalker, blackmailer, liar and a sex life with TA that she hole-heartedly enjoyed. Yet she dismisses this under cross from JM because she's not an "expert" in those areas and she's only there to discuss DV! I mean..give me a f'g break! Can't wait for the Juror's questions - even when they're responded to by "It's not a yes or no question".