Trial Discussion Thread #25 - 14.04.14, Day 22

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #321
Now onto bail affi. Nel reads and OP doesn't mention it. OP says he doesn't know why.

O: I noticed there was noone in bthrm, the toilet door was closed...there were many many thoughts going thru my mind; someone might climb in window, stick a firearm thru...

N: But did you think there was someone in the toilet?

O: Yes I did Milady.

So he wants us to believe an intruder broke into his house to use the toilet? :rolleyes:
 
  • #322
They are talking a lot about the toilet door slam; Nel thinks he did not say it in the morning at the right time in his version. Pistorius disagrees. (I thought I heard his say door very briefly…??)

Pistorius is unsure why it’s not in the BAS. I mentioned it to my legal team so I am not sure why it’s not in there. Even more devastating it’s not in your plea explanation.

He repeats, “I am not sure.” Quite a few times. Repeats this phrase.

Nel: I put it to you that you never said it to counsel.
Why did they not put it in?

Pistoirus again repeats: I am not sure Milady.

Nel wants to illustrate he’s tailoring his evidence constantly.

Pistorious blames his legal team again, but it’s presumably normal practice they would have put such a big detail in either statement.
 
  • #323
He is saying he didn't extend his arm .. and this is on his prosthesis .. then the trajectory of the bullets, and the height of the bullet holes is going to be all wrong!
 
  • #324
"I didn't have time to think"
 
  • #325
OP says he was holding gun in right hand, balancing against wall with left hand, he was struggling to balance. "I was not extending my arm. I was staying put"

Nel wants that put on record, and insists: 'Were you aiming?'

O: I pointed my gun at the door...I didn't aim at the door. My firearm was pointed at the door.
 
  • #326
.. I reckon he is confusing shooting from the hip on his prosthesis ..
 
  • #327
O: I discharged my firearm...

N: So you wanted to shoot the person coming out?

O: No, I didn't have time to think.
 
  • #328
Here we go:

He now fired out of 'fear' not due to an 'accident'
 
  • #329
OP denying that he wanted to shoot the person in the WC. He "fired at the door," not at the attacker.

Here come the tears again! I wish that he would just confess. Listening to Mr. Nel slice him to pieces is painful.
 
  • #330
Apart from crouching, was it also said arm tucked into his side? Did someone say that was said about his arm?

Ah! This was when OP was moving along the corridor to the bathroom. He raised his arm and pointed at the door at the end of the corridor looking at the toilet door.
 
  • #331
N: Is it your defence you fired at attacker/perceived attacker?

O: I fired at the door.

Nel asks again. OP says No, so Nel asks; 'What is your defence?'

I think the answer was fear???
 
  • #332
I don't think he expected the crime scene investigators to be quite so good at what they do and be able to pick up on every little thing .. he thought/thinks he would/will be able to outwit everyone all the time, but hasn't realised how experienced these people and no amount of contamination will hide things like a trail of blood which follows a line across the carpet then onto the duvet .. and then which means, together with the fact the jeans are overlapping the duvet, that the duvet must've been on the floor all the time .. which then in turn means that the fan couldn't have been in the place where the duvet is.

Nice try though, Oscar.

Exactly !!:goodpost:
 
  • #333
OH no, Nel is saying putative self defense is gone now!!! More tears now. OP, "I did not fire at Reeva!" Cry cry cry...
 
  • #334
O: I didn't fire ti kill anyone...I didn't have time to think....I though someone was coming out to attack me...

Ne says he is changing defence from putative self defence. OP says he doesn't understand the law.
 
  • #335
Busted,
 
  • #336
O: It's not true!...I did not fire at Reeva!

Breaks down. Adjourned.
 
  • #337
Oh, this is RIDICULOUS.

This judge has got to be losing patience quickly.
 
  • #338
Nel came up with legalese there about the defence plea, but he lost me....what did it mean anyone?
 
  • #339
I know I am not crazy but didn't we hear Nel asking these same questions in depth last week? I know the one able the door slamming was because I got so frustrated how long it was drug out.



I guess SA doesn't have the objection "asked and answered" LOL!

Roux could object and Masipa could reign Nel in - as happened with Roux on cross. But its doubtful, imo, she'd intervene while Nel's questions are still eliciting different answers.


Please pardon errors as posted via Tapatalk with a less than stellar user.
 
  • #340
That was nicely done how he got Oscar confused when he said that he was giving up the self defense aspect
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
89
Guests online
1,242
Total visitors
1,331

Forum statistics

Threads
632,343
Messages
18,624,977
Members
243,098
Latest member
sbidbh
Back
Top