steveml
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,378
- Reaction score
- 31
Legally, the State has a case for murder. They would be doing a disservice to Reeva, her family, and all homicide victims in South Africa not to attempt a conviction for murder.
Charging a lesser offence; plea bargaining - those are events that occur when the State doesn't have the evidence to prove a higher charge. If Oscar didn't testify, he would most likely be convicted of murder. Simply because there would be no mitigation for requisite intent.
It isn't the prosecutors job to predict what a defendant's defence will be and charge accordingly. Had Oscar been wearing his prosthetics, on stumps, or even with his own natural legs had he been born with them - the charge would have been the same - because black and white, they have legal grounds to do so. No less, no more.
Please pardon errors as posted via Tapatalk with a less than stellar user.
I guess we'll only know that after the trial is over. I'd hope not to see a plea bargain in any case like this.