I am surprised we didn't hear much about the "infamous" pea coat, that TLM testified covered VS on the back seat for several hours.
Despite there being 40 places of interest to forensic scientists, the presence of saliva, 2 blond hairs, and DNA from other unknown people..............they didn't find a single sample of DNA from VS?
If MR cleaned the coat............all that other evidence wouldn't be there.
If MR didn't clean the coat.........VS DNA should be there (if TLM told the truth)
If TLM lied about it..........would it question the random abduction story?
Maybe I just missed something...................???
JMO..........MOOO
Another issue I am having is that MR and TLM DNA was found on the front passenger seat, where one would grab onto when getting out of the back seat. The way TLM described the second rape one would assume VS DNA would also be there. Since we know the area was not cleaned then why no DNA?