There is absolutely no accountability in the media.
Here is the case for why:
1. A Paper is owned by an entity, and most likely it's owners/shareholders are driven by one factor and one factor alone: the bottom line/shareholder price.
2. This equates to driving one thing that increases revenue, readership. Readership is driven not really by the quality of the way an article is written as we all know, but by the way that the story raises attention from other life events, so sensationalism reigns supreme in doing this.
3. This is abused of course, by writing articles that are not necessarily fact checked, or even if they are, are quoted or stated in a way so as to make the content stand out in a sensationalist way. This could mean by honing in on specific facts/language that will usually psychology prod readers to be inquisitive.
4. The reason why "writers", and I use this word liberally, are removed from being associated to what they write, is because there are no costs great enough as compared to the benefit of the salary they encrue from their master the news source. I would also never call most of them "journalists" nowadays as most are so far removed from this type of research/analysis.
So now, this is where the base for my case in dealing with this issue starts.
Basically, the media and the "writers" need some form of "cost" associated with their craft, as they have too much effect/power and no really tangible repercussions from abusing this said power. This includes trhe editors and publishers, but the real people to make squirm sort of a bottom up approach of accountability is to start with the writers. I have had this idea for a while, and as a technologist and with my connections in the start up community, I intend to take my frustration with the media over the years, and make them accountable. Watch me.
I liked this quote, becuase I can misuse it for the double entendre, in regards to this issue:
"Today's opportunities erase yesterday's failures." gene brown.