It could be because of the weather too, maybe it was raining or cold when she wore the cap and then she took it off.
I don't think that bag she has under her right shoulder has much room in it. Probably not enough for an Ipad and a cap, too.
It could be because of the weather too, maybe it was raining or cold when she wore the cap and then she took it off.
EXACTLY. That's just what I was thinking.
Which also relates back to ToutCa's comment about the Munich stop still being part of the investigation.
Yipes.
This is making me mental.ullhair:
It could be because of the weather too, maybe it was raining or cold when she wore the cap and then she took it off.
Please deduce for me your logic at getting to this possibility. evidence for is a dangerous thing to do in smearing them.
I really just want people to be more careful.
It's just that when I first saw the cap I had assumed she was wearing it to look conservative. I don't remember ever seeing another woman around here wearing a cap like that one. I didn't associate it with any sort of winter cap. It was yesterday that I first saw the photo of her on the NYC subway wearing the same cap. It could well be that she was just wearing it to keep warm.
Uhhh.....I'm going to completely reserve comment on this outfit, especially the bell bottom pants.
http://www.internethaber.com/saraini...li-504455h.htm
I had read that TK recommended SS to spend her last day in the peninsula, referring to tip of the Old City, saying "The peninsula is our pride". Sounds weird. No matter how I translate it or read it. What's with that? What are we proud of? Who are we? Locals of Lygos, Byzantium, New Rome, Constantinople or İstanbul?
I would never recommend that. And to do what? Promenading? Saray Point (sarayburnu) looks out to the Marmara Sea, not much to see. The view of Saray Point is much nicer than the view from Saray Point.
So weird.
Bad advice.
I think bell-bottom pants are "over" and not a good fashion choice for a short woman, no matter how thin.
OH NO!!!! **Quickly changes out of bell-bottom pants**
I think bell-bottom pants are "over" and not a good fashion choice for a short woman, no matter how thin.
And they don't tuck into those wedge boots very easily without bunching up at the bottom and looking a bit like a harem pant.
It's just that when I first saw the cap I had assumed she was wearing it to look conservative. I don't remember ever seeing another woman around here wearing a cap like that one. I didn't associate it with any sort of winter cap. It was yesterday that I first saw the photo of her on the NYC subway wearing the same cap. It could well be that she was just wearing it to keep warm.
It's just that when I first saw the cap I had assumed she was wearing it to look conservative. I don't remember ever seeing another woman around here wearing a cap like that one. I didn't associate it with any sort of winter cap. It was yesterday that I first saw the photo of her on the NYC subway wearing the same cap. It could well be that she was just wearing it to keep warm.
Exactly.
Wide flare is dated.
Slim fit is in now in NYC.
But to each his own.
It will be of value to hear the response from people who know her style once they have a look.
Hey- don't accuse me of using logic!:groucho:
I'm referring to comment by ToutCa. You can use the link if it comes through.
"The most mainstream and credible of Turkish media, Hurriyet, just posted on its news blog TODAY that Turkish LE are still pursuing 3 lines of investigation:
LINK
(1) Homeless denizens of the walls, including but not exclusively "Z"
(2) SS's Instagram and gmail contacts
(3) SS's side trip, and in particular the mysterious "Munich" leg "
There is absolutely no accountability in the media.
Here is the case for why:
1. A Paper is owned by an entity, and most likely it's owners/shareholders are driven by one factor and one factor alone: the bottom line/shareholder price.
2. This equates to driving one thing that increases revenue, readership. Readership is driven not really by the quality of the way an article is written as we all know, but by the way that the story raises attention from other life events, so sensationalism reigns supreme in doing this.
3. This is abused of course, by writing articles that are not necessarily fact checked, or even if they are, are quoted or stated in a way so as to make the content stand out in a sensationalist way. This could mean by honing in on specific facts/language that will usually psychology prod readers to be inquisitive.
4. The reason why "writers", and I use this word liberally, are removed from being associated to what they write, is because there are no costs great enough as compared to the benefit of the salary they encrue from their master the news source. I would also never call most of them "journalists" nowadays as most are so far removed from this type of research/analysis.
So now, this is where the base for my case in dealing with this issue starts.
Basically, the media and the "writers" need some form of "cost" associated with their craft, as they have too much effect/power and no really tangible repercussions from abusing this said power. This includes trhe editors and publishers, but the real people to make squirm sort of a bottom up approach of accountability is to start with the writers. I have had this idea for a while, and as a technologist and with my connections in the start up community, I intend to take my frustration with the media over the years, and make them accountable. Watch me.
I liked this quote, becuase I can misuse it for the double entendre, in regards to this issue:
"Today's opportunities erase yesterday's failures." gene brown.
I don't think she would have felt the need to wear a cap in Istanbul for the sole purpose of being conservative in Istanbul. It's just not that type of city. Yes some women wear head scarves but the majority of women do not cover their heads at all. Even the ones that do cover their heads do so in varying ways, some cover all of their hair so the scarf just frames their face, some have a few wisps of hair sticking out, some have a lot of hair showing. But regardless the majority if women in Istanbul do not cover their heads at all, a point that would have been very obvious to Sarai when she was there, so I don't think her choice to wear a hat would have been at all influenced by trying to be conservative.
Perhaps just a fashion statement, and she seemed to wear one in NY, perhaps due to the weather. As Yashim pointed out it was 63 on the day she disappeared, so if she was wearing it for weather, it would explain why she wasnt wearing it that day.
Or like Herat said, she wasnt wearing it that day so that her hair wouldn't be kinked by hat head because she wanted to get some good pictures of herself. And since its hard to take pictures of yourself.....well maybe just maybe this is another clue she was meeting someone there.
I believe Yashim was guessing that perhaps he lived in Yenikoy (translation Newtown), because its an upscale area near his lawyers office in Sariyer. But that is an area that is quite far from begoylu. It's down the Bosphorous passed the second suspension bridge that crosses the Bosphorous connecting the European and Asian sides.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.